Cargando…
Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359 |
_version_ | 1785062578026708992 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Wesley J VanDyke, Maia E Venishetty, Nikit Langford, Brian T Franzen, Bryce P Morey, Allen F |
author_facet | Smith, Wesley J VanDyke, Maia E Venishetty, Nikit Langford, Brian T Franzen, Bryce P Morey, Allen F |
author_sort | Smith, Wesley J |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACT(TM) system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0–1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73–93% vs 70–90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10290851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102908512023-06-26 Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success Smith, Wesley J VanDyke, Maia E Venishetty, Nikit Langford, Brian T Franzen, Bryce P Morey, Allen F Res Rep Urol Review PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACT(TM) system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0–1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73–93% vs 70–90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems. Dove 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10290851/ /pubmed/37366389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359 Text en © 2023 Smith et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Smith, Wesley J VanDyke, Maia E Venishetty, Nikit Langford, Brian T Franzen, Bryce P Morey, Allen F Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title | Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title_full | Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title_fullStr | Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title_short | Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success |
title_sort | surgical management of male stress incontinence: techniques, indications, and pearls for success |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithwesleyj surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess AT vandykemaiae surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess AT venishettynikit surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess AT langfordbriant surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess AT franzenbrycep surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess AT moreyallenf surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess |