Cargando…

Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success

PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Wesley J, VanDyke, Maia E, Venishetty, Nikit, Langford, Brian T, Franzen, Bryce P, Morey, Allen F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359
_version_ 1785062578026708992
author Smith, Wesley J
VanDyke, Maia E
Venishetty, Nikit
Langford, Brian T
Franzen, Bryce P
Morey, Allen F
author_facet Smith, Wesley J
VanDyke, Maia E
Venishetty, Nikit
Langford, Brian T
Franzen, Bryce P
Morey, Allen F
author_sort Smith, Wesley J
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACT(TM) system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0–1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73–93% vs 70–90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10290851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102908512023-06-26 Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success Smith, Wesley J VanDyke, Maia E Venishetty, Nikit Langford, Brian T Franzen, Bryce P Morey, Allen F Res Rep Urol Review PURPOSE: Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACT(TM) system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies. RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0–1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73–93% vs 70–90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems. Dove 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10290851/ /pubmed/37366389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359 Text en © 2023 Smith et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Smith, Wesley J
VanDyke, Maia E
Venishetty, Nikit
Langford, Brian T
Franzen, Bryce P
Morey, Allen F
Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title_full Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title_fullStr Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title_short Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success
title_sort surgical management of male stress incontinence: techniques, indications, and pearls for success
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S395359
work_keys_str_mv AT smithwesleyj surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess
AT vandykemaiae surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess
AT venishettynikit surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess
AT langfordbriant surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess
AT franzenbrycep surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess
AT moreyallenf surgicalmanagementofmalestressincontinencetechniquesindicationsandpearlsforsuccess