Cargando…

Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In 2016, Lin et al. developed a prediction score of non-responsiveness to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) (Lin et al., 2016). Various studies have attempted to validate the Formosa score, but inconsistent results have given us new opportunities an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiang, Wan-Ni, Huang, Po-Yu, Kuo, Ho-Chang, Huang, Ying-Hsien, Chang, Ling-Sai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1164530
_version_ 1785062614813900800
author Chiang, Wan-Ni
Huang, Po-Yu
Kuo, Ho-Chang
Huang, Ying-Hsien
Chang, Ling-Sai
author_facet Chiang, Wan-Ni
Huang, Po-Yu
Kuo, Ho-Chang
Huang, Ying-Hsien
Chang, Ling-Sai
author_sort Chiang, Wan-Ni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2016, Lin et al. developed a prediction score of non-responsiveness to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) (Lin et al., 2016). Various studies have attempted to validate the Formosa score, but inconsistent results have given us new opportunities and challenges. The aim of this meta-analysis is to explore the role of the Formosa score as a risk score in detecting IVIG-resistant KD patients and then compare the pooled sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores, Egami, Formosa, Kobayashi, and Sano risk scores. METHODS: A comprehensive search of Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed was conducted through 20 December 2021, using key terms relevant to the research question “What are the sensitivities and specificities of the four Asian predicting scores, Egami, Formosa, Kobayashi, and Sano, in Kawasaki disease patients with IVIG resistance?” The reference lists of the included studies were manually reviewed to identify pertinent references. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary of sensitivity and specificity of the tools. RESULTS: We found 41 relevant studies of the four Asian risk scores that were eligible to analyze for pooled accuracy. Eleven studies involving 5,169 KD patients reported the diagnostic performance of the Formosa score for the risk of IVIG resistance. The overall performance of the Formosa score was as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48–0.70]; pooled specificity, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.50–0.68); and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62. The Formosa score exhibited the highest sensitivity 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70–0.82) for detecting IVIG-resistant KD patients among the 21,389 children included in the 41 studies. In terms of specificity estimates, Formosa had the lowest specificity of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41–0.51). CONCLUSION: Patients at high risk for IVIG resistance may receive adjunctive treatment to reduce coronary lesions and thus also cardiovascular morbidity. Among all of the included studies, we found Formosa score to have the best sensitivity (0.76) but unsatisfactory specificity (0.46) for predicting IVIG resistance in Kawasaki disease. In the future, network meta-analysis should also incorporate the accuracy of the new scores after they have undergone a certain degree of validation around the world. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO CRD42022341410.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102910522023-06-27 Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis Chiang, Wan-Ni Huang, Po-Yu Kuo, Ho-Chang Huang, Ying-Hsien Chang, Ling-Sai Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: In 2016, Lin et al. developed a prediction score of non-responsiveness to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) (Lin et al., 2016). Various studies have attempted to validate the Formosa score, but inconsistent results have given us new opportunities and challenges. The aim of this meta-analysis is to explore the role of the Formosa score as a risk score in detecting IVIG-resistant KD patients and then compare the pooled sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores, Egami, Formosa, Kobayashi, and Sano risk scores. METHODS: A comprehensive search of Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed was conducted through 20 December 2021, using key terms relevant to the research question “What are the sensitivities and specificities of the four Asian predicting scores, Egami, Formosa, Kobayashi, and Sano, in Kawasaki disease patients with IVIG resistance?” The reference lists of the included studies were manually reviewed to identify pertinent references. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary of sensitivity and specificity of the tools. RESULTS: We found 41 relevant studies of the four Asian risk scores that were eligible to analyze for pooled accuracy. Eleven studies involving 5,169 KD patients reported the diagnostic performance of the Formosa score for the risk of IVIG resistance. The overall performance of the Formosa score was as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48–0.70]; pooled specificity, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.50–0.68); and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62. The Formosa score exhibited the highest sensitivity 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70–0.82) for detecting IVIG-resistant KD patients among the 21,389 children included in the 41 studies. In terms of specificity estimates, Formosa had the lowest specificity of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41–0.51). CONCLUSION: Patients at high risk for IVIG resistance may receive adjunctive treatment to reduce coronary lesions and thus also cardiovascular morbidity. Among all of the included studies, we found Formosa score to have the best sensitivity (0.76) but unsatisfactory specificity (0.46) for predicting IVIG resistance in Kawasaki disease. In the future, network meta-analysis should also incorporate the accuracy of the new scores after they have undergone a certain degree of validation around the world. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO CRD42022341410. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10291052/ /pubmed/37378410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1164530 Text en © 2023 Chiang, Huang, Kuo, Huang and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Chiang, Wan-Ni
Huang, Po-Yu
Kuo, Ho-Chang
Huang, Ying-Hsien
Chang, Ling-Sai
Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of Formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four Asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of formosa score and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of four asian risk scores for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in kawasaki disease: a bivariate meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1164530
work_keys_str_mv AT chiangwanni evaluationofformosascoreanddiagnosticsensitivityandspecificityoffourasianriskscoresforpredictingintravenousimmunoglobulinresistanceinkawasakidiseaseabivariatemetaanalysis
AT huangpoyu evaluationofformosascoreanddiagnosticsensitivityandspecificityoffourasianriskscoresforpredictingintravenousimmunoglobulinresistanceinkawasakidiseaseabivariatemetaanalysis
AT kuohochang evaluationofformosascoreanddiagnosticsensitivityandspecificityoffourasianriskscoresforpredictingintravenousimmunoglobulinresistanceinkawasakidiseaseabivariatemetaanalysis
AT huangyinghsien evaluationofformosascoreanddiagnosticsensitivityandspecificityoffourasianriskscoresforpredictingintravenousimmunoglobulinresistanceinkawasakidiseaseabivariatemetaanalysis
AT changlingsai evaluationofformosascoreanddiagnosticsensitivityandspecificityoffourasianriskscoresforpredictingintravenousimmunoglobulinresistanceinkawasakidiseaseabivariatemetaanalysis