Cargando…

Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: Revision rates after total ankle replacements (TARs) are higher compared with other total joint replacements. The present study aimed to establish a new patient-specific implantation (PSI) technique for TAR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 10 complete Caucasian cadaver legs had whole le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claassen, Leif, Luedtke, Philipp, Nebel, Dennis, Yao, Daiwei, Ettinger, Sarah, Daniilidis, Kiriakos, Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina, Plaass, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19386400211029741
_version_ 1785062630024544256
author Claassen, Leif
Luedtke, Philipp
Nebel, Dennis
Yao, Daiwei
Ettinger, Sarah
Daniilidis, Kiriakos
Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina
Plaass, Christian
author_facet Claassen, Leif
Luedtke, Philipp
Nebel, Dennis
Yao, Daiwei
Ettinger, Sarah
Daniilidis, Kiriakos
Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina
Plaass, Christian
author_sort Claassen, Leif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Revision rates after total ankle replacements (TARs) are higher compared with other total joint replacements. The present study aimed to establish a new patient-specific implantation (PSI) technique for TAR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 10 complete Caucasian cadaver legs had whole leg computed tomography scans. The individual geometrical ankle joint axis was determined, and based on this axis, the position of the prosthesis was planned. We assessed prosthesis placement, guiding block position, and preoperative and postoperative ankle rotational axes. RESULTS: The guiding block position interobserver reliability was 0.37 mm 0.45 (mean ± SD) for the tibial guiding block. The value for the first talar guiding block was 1.72 ± 1.3 mm and for the second talar guiding block, 0.61 ± 0.39 mm. The tibial slope as well as the frontal angles of the anatomical tibial axis compared to the tibial and talar articular surfaces showed no statistically relevant differences with numbers available. The deviation of the assessed preoperative joint axis to the postoperative joint axis was 14.6° ± 7.8. CONCLUSION: The present study describes the results of an establishing process of a new PSI technique for TAR. The reliability of guiding block positioning and, thereby, prosthesis placement is sufficient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102911172023-06-27 Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study Claassen, Leif Luedtke, Philipp Nebel, Dennis Yao, Daiwei Ettinger, Sarah Daniilidis, Kiriakos Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina Plaass, Christian Foot Ankle Spec Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Revision rates after total ankle replacements (TARs) are higher compared with other total joint replacements. The present study aimed to establish a new patient-specific implantation (PSI) technique for TAR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 10 complete Caucasian cadaver legs had whole leg computed tomography scans. The individual geometrical ankle joint axis was determined, and based on this axis, the position of the prosthesis was planned. We assessed prosthesis placement, guiding block position, and preoperative and postoperative ankle rotational axes. RESULTS: The guiding block position interobserver reliability was 0.37 mm 0.45 (mean ± SD) for the tibial guiding block. The value for the first talar guiding block was 1.72 ± 1.3 mm and for the second talar guiding block, 0.61 ± 0.39 mm. The tibial slope as well as the frontal angles of the anatomical tibial axis compared to the tibial and talar articular surfaces showed no statistically relevant differences with numbers available. The deviation of the assessed preoperative joint axis to the postoperative joint axis was 14.6° ± 7.8. CONCLUSION: The present study describes the results of an establishing process of a new PSI technique for TAR. The reliability of guiding block positioning and, thereby, prosthesis placement is sufficient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study SAGE Publications 2021-07-12 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10291117/ /pubmed/34253082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19386400211029741 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Claassen, Leif
Luedtke, Philipp
Nebel, Dennis
Yao, Daiwei
Ettinger, Sarah
Daniilidis, Kiriakos
Stukenborg-Colsman, Christina
Plaass, Christian
Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title_full Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title_short Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study
title_sort establishing a new patient-specific implantation technique for total ankle replacement: an in vitro study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19386400211029741
work_keys_str_mv AT claassenleif establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT luedtkephilipp establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT nebeldennis establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT yaodaiwei establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT ettingersarah establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT daniilidiskiriakos establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT stukenborgcolsmanchristina establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy
AT plaasschristian establishinganewpatientspecificimplantationtechniquefortotalanklereplacementaninvitrostudy