Cargando…
Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version
OBJECTIVES: A general expectation measurement of inpatients across wards is needed in the patient safety management systems of general hospitals. This study developed and psychometrically validated a new scale fulfilling the requirements above: the Hospitalized Patients’ Expectations for Treatment S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1201707 |
_version_ | 1785062630704021504 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Chunfeng Wu, Aoxue Wang, Yufei Li, Tao Duan, Yanping Jiang, Yinan Shi, Lili Hong, Xia Geng, Wenqi Li, Jiarui Du, Jianhua Hu, Jiaojiao Cao, Jinya Wei, Jing |
author_facet | Xiao, Chunfeng Wu, Aoxue Wang, Yufei Li, Tao Duan, Yanping Jiang, Yinan Shi, Lili Hong, Xia Geng, Wenqi Li, Jiarui Du, Jianhua Hu, Jiaojiao Cao, Jinya Wei, Jing |
author_sort | Xiao, Chunfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: A general expectation measurement of inpatients across wards is needed in the patient safety management systems of general hospitals. This study developed and psychometrically validated a new scale fulfilling the requirements above: the Hospitalized Patients’ Expectations for Treatment Scale-Patient version (HOPE-P). METHODS: A total of 35 experts and ten inpatients were interviewed during the formulation of the HOPE-P scale, which was initially designed with three dimensions: doctor–patient communication expectations, treatment outcome expectations, and disease management expectancy. We recruited 210 inpatients from a general hospital in China and explored the reliability, validity, and psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire. Item analysis, construct validity, internal consistency and 7-day test–retest reliability analysis were applied. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a 2-dimension (doctor–patient communication expectation and treatment outcome expectation) structure with satisfactory model fit parameters (root mean square residual (RMR) = 0.035, a root-mean-square-error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.072, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.984, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.970). Item analysis revealed an appropriate item design (r = 0.573–0.820). The scale exhibited good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s α of 0.893, 0.761, and 0.919 for the overall scale, the doctor–patient communication expectation subscale, and the treatment outcome expectation subscale, respectively. The 7-day test–retest reliability was 0.782 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that the HOPE-P is a reliable and valid assessment tool to measure the expectations of general hospital inpatients, with a strong capacity to recognize patients’ expectations regarding doctor–patient communication and treatment outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10291120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102911202023-06-27 Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version Xiao, Chunfeng Wu, Aoxue Wang, Yufei Li, Tao Duan, Yanping Jiang, Yinan Shi, Lili Hong, Xia Geng, Wenqi Li, Jiarui Du, Jianhua Hu, Jiaojiao Cao, Jinya Wei, Jing Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVES: A general expectation measurement of inpatients across wards is needed in the patient safety management systems of general hospitals. This study developed and psychometrically validated a new scale fulfilling the requirements above: the Hospitalized Patients’ Expectations for Treatment Scale-Patient version (HOPE-P). METHODS: A total of 35 experts and ten inpatients were interviewed during the formulation of the HOPE-P scale, which was initially designed with three dimensions: doctor–patient communication expectations, treatment outcome expectations, and disease management expectancy. We recruited 210 inpatients from a general hospital in China and explored the reliability, validity, and psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire. Item analysis, construct validity, internal consistency and 7-day test–retest reliability analysis were applied. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a 2-dimension (doctor–patient communication expectation and treatment outcome expectation) structure with satisfactory model fit parameters (root mean square residual (RMR) = 0.035, a root-mean-square-error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.072, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.984, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.970). Item analysis revealed an appropriate item design (r = 0.573–0.820). The scale exhibited good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s α of 0.893, 0.761, and 0.919 for the overall scale, the doctor–patient communication expectation subscale, and the treatment outcome expectation subscale, respectively. The 7-day test–retest reliability was 0.782 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that the HOPE-P is a reliable and valid assessment tool to measure the expectations of general hospital inpatients, with a strong capacity to recognize patients’ expectations regarding doctor–patient communication and treatment outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10291120/ /pubmed/37377470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1201707 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xiao, Wu, Wang, Li, Duan, Jiang, Shi, Hong, Geng, Li, Du, Hu, Cao and Wei. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Xiao, Chunfeng Wu, Aoxue Wang, Yufei Li, Tao Duan, Yanping Jiang, Yinan Shi, Lili Hong, Xia Geng, Wenqi Li, Jiarui Du, Jianhua Hu, Jiaojiao Cao, Jinya Wei, Jing Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title | Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title_full | Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title_fullStr | Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title_short | Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
title_sort | development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients’ expectations for treatment scale-patient version |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1201707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaochunfeng developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT wuaoxue developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT wangyufei developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT litao developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT duanyanping developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT jiangyinan developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT shilili developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT hongxia developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT gengwenqi developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT lijiarui developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT dujianhua developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT hujiaojiao developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT caojinya developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion AT weijing developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthehospitalizedpatientsexpectationsfortreatmentscalepatientversion |