Cargando…
An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369 |
_version_ | 1785062648788811776 |
---|---|
author | Medina Caro, Diego Horstmann, Lucas Ganzert, Lars Oses, Romulo Friedl, Thomas Wagner, Dirk |
author_facet | Medina Caro, Diego Horstmann, Lucas Ganzert, Lars Oses, Romulo Friedl, Thomas Wagner, Dirk |
author_sort | Medina Caro, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require separating cells from the sample matrix, their DNA yields are generally lower than direct methods that lyse the cells within the sample matrix. We, therefore, tested different buffers with and without adding a detergent mix (DM) in the extraction protocol to improve the recovery of iDNA from surface and subsurface samples that covered a variety of terrestrial environments. The combination of a highly concentrated sodium phosphate buffer plus DM significantly improved iDNA recovery for almost all tested samples. Additionally, the combination of sodium phosphate and EDTA improved iDNA recovery in most of the samples and even allowed the successful extraction of iDNA from extremely low‐biomass iron‐bearing rock samples taken from the deep biosphere. Based on our results, we recommend using a protocol with sodium phosphate in combination with either a DM (NaP 300 mM + DM) or EDTA (NaP + EDTA 300 mM). Furthermore, for studies that rely on the eDNA pool, we recommend using buffers solely based on sodium phosphate because the addition of EDTA or a DM resulted in a decrease in eDNA for most of the tested samples. These improvements can help reduce community bias in environmental studies and contribute to better characterizations of both modern and past ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10291228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102912282023-06-27 An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments Medina Caro, Diego Horstmann, Lucas Ganzert, Lars Oses, Romulo Friedl, Thomas Wagner, Dirk Microbiologyopen Original Articles The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require separating cells from the sample matrix, their DNA yields are generally lower than direct methods that lyse the cells within the sample matrix. We, therefore, tested different buffers with and without adding a detergent mix (DM) in the extraction protocol to improve the recovery of iDNA from surface and subsurface samples that covered a variety of terrestrial environments. The combination of a highly concentrated sodium phosphate buffer plus DM significantly improved iDNA recovery for almost all tested samples. Additionally, the combination of sodium phosphate and EDTA improved iDNA recovery in most of the samples and even allowed the successful extraction of iDNA from extremely low‐biomass iron‐bearing rock samples taken from the deep biosphere. Based on our results, we recommend using a protocol with sodium phosphate in combination with either a DM (NaP 300 mM + DM) or EDTA (NaP + EDTA 300 mM). Furthermore, for studies that rely on the eDNA pool, we recommend using buffers solely based on sodium phosphate because the addition of EDTA or a DM resulted in a decrease in eDNA for most of the tested samples. These improvements can help reduce community bias in environmental studies and contribute to better characterizations of both modern and past ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10291228/ /pubmed/37379428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369 Text en © 2023 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Medina Caro, Diego Horstmann, Lucas Ganzert, Lars Oses, Romulo Friedl, Thomas Wagner, Dirk An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title | An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title_full | An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title_fullStr | An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title_full_unstemmed | An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title_short | An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments |
title_sort | improved method for intracellular dna (idna) recovery from terrestrial environments |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT medinacarodiego animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT horstmannlucas animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT ganzertlars animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT osesromulo animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT friedlthomas animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT wagnerdirk animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT medinacarodiego improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT horstmannlucas improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT ganzertlars improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT osesromulo improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT friedlthomas improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments AT wagnerdirk improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments |