Cargando…

An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments

The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina Caro, Diego, Horstmann, Lucas, Ganzert, Lars, Oses, Romulo, Friedl, Thomas, Wagner, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369
_version_ 1785062648788811776
author Medina Caro, Diego
Horstmann, Lucas
Ganzert, Lars
Oses, Romulo
Friedl, Thomas
Wagner, Dirk
author_facet Medina Caro, Diego
Horstmann, Lucas
Ganzert, Lars
Oses, Romulo
Friedl, Thomas
Wagner, Dirk
author_sort Medina Caro, Diego
collection PubMed
description The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require separating cells from the sample matrix, their DNA yields are generally lower than direct methods that lyse the cells within the sample matrix. We, therefore, tested different buffers with and without adding a detergent mix (DM) in the extraction protocol to improve the recovery of iDNA from surface and subsurface samples that covered a variety of terrestrial environments. The combination of a highly concentrated sodium phosphate buffer plus DM significantly improved iDNA recovery for almost all tested samples. Additionally, the combination of sodium phosphate and EDTA improved iDNA recovery in most of the samples and even allowed the successful extraction of iDNA from extremely low‐biomass iron‐bearing rock samples taken from the deep biosphere. Based on our results, we recommend using a protocol with sodium phosphate in combination with either a DM (NaP 300 mM + DM) or EDTA (NaP + EDTA 300 mM). Furthermore, for studies that rely on the eDNA pool, we recommend using buffers solely based on sodium phosphate because the addition of EDTA or a DM resulted in a decrease in eDNA for most of the tested samples. These improvements can help reduce community bias in environmental studies and contribute to better characterizations of both modern and past ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102912282023-06-27 An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments Medina Caro, Diego Horstmann, Lucas Ganzert, Lars Oses, Romulo Friedl, Thomas Wagner, Dirk Microbiologyopen Original Articles The simultaneous extraction of intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA) can help to separate the living in situ community (represented by iDNA) from background DNA that originated both from past communities and from allochthonous sources. As iDNA and eDNA extraction protocols require separating cells from the sample matrix, their DNA yields are generally lower than direct methods that lyse the cells within the sample matrix. We, therefore, tested different buffers with and without adding a detergent mix (DM) in the extraction protocol to improve the recovery of iDNA from surface and subsurface samples that covered a variety of terrestrial environments. The combination of a highly concentrated sodium phosphate buffer plus DM significantly improved iDNA recovery for almost all tested samples. Additionally, the combination of sodium phosphate and EDTA improved iDNA recovery in most of the samples and even allowed the successful extraction of iDNA from extremely low‐biomass iron‐bearing rock samples taken from the deep biosphere. Based on our results, we recommend using a protocol with sodium phosphate in combination with either a DM (NaP 300 mM + DM) or EDTA (NaP + EDTA 300 mM). Furthermore, for studies that rely on the eDNA pool, we recommend using buffers solely based on sodium phosphate because the addition of EDTA or a DM resulted in a decrease in eDNA for most of the tested samples. These improvements can help reduce community bias in environmental studies and contribute to better characterizations of both modern and past ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10291228/ /pubmed/37379428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369 Text en © 2023 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Medina Caro, Diego
Horstmann, Lucas
Ganzert, Lars
Oses, Romulo
Friedl, Thomas
Wagner, Dirk
An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title_full An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title_fullStr An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title_full_unstemmed An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title_short An improved method for intracellular DNA (iDNA) recovery from terrestrial environments
title_sort improved method for intracellular dna (idna) recovery from terrestrial environments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1369
work_keys_str_mv AT medinacarodiego animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT horstmannlucas animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT ganzertlars animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT osesromulo animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT friedlthomas animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT wagnerdirk animprovedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT medinacarodiego improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT horstmannlucas improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT ganzertlars improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT osesromulo improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT friedlthomas improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments
AT wagnerdirk improvedmethodforintracellulardnaidnarecoveryfromterrestrialenvironments