Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and composition...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031 |
_version_ | 1785062695452540928 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernández, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagli, Dafni Maria Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Camargo, Ana M Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Raffaello, Tommaso |
author_facet | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernández, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagli, Dafni Maria Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Camargo, Ana M Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Raffaello, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and compositional characteristics between cotton COT102 and its non‐GM comparator needs further assessment, except for levels of acid detergent fibre, which do not raise safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Vip3Aa19 and APH4 proteins as expressed in cotton COT102 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of cotton COT102. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from cotton COT102 does not represent a nutritional concern for humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM cotton varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable cotton COT102 seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10291446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102914462023-06-27 Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernández, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagli, Dafni Maria Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Camargo, Ana M Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and compositional characteristics between cotton COT102 and its non‐GM comparator needs further assessment, except for levels of acid detergent fibre, which do not raise safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Vip3Aa19 and APH4 proteins as expressed in cotton COT102 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of cotton COT102. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from cotton COT102 does not represent a nutritional concern for humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM cotton varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable cotton COT102 seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10291446/ /pubmed/37377664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernández, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagli, Dafni Maria Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Camargo, Ana M Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Raffaello, Tommaso Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified cotton cot102 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐de‐2017‐141) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT fernandezantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT goumperistilemachos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT kaglidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT lenzipaolo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT lewandowskaaleksandra assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT camargoanam assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141 |