Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)

Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and composition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Ewen, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Fernández, Antonio, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel, Goumperis, Tilemachos, Kagli, Dafni Maria, Lenzi, Paolo, Lewandowska, Aleksandra, Camargo, Ana M, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Raffaello, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377664
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031
_version_ 1785062695452540928
author Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernández, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagli, Dafni Maria
Lenzi, Paolo
Lewandowska, Aleksandra
Camargo, Ana M
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Raffaello, Tommaso
author_facet Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernández, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagli, Dafni Maria
Lenzi, Paolo
Lewandowska, Aleksandra
Camargo, Ana M
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Raffaello, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and compositional characteristics between cotton COT102 and its non‐GM comparator needs further assessment, except for levels of acid detergent fibre, which do not raise safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Vip3Aa19 and APH4 proteins as expressed in cotton COT102 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of cotton COT102. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from cotton COT102 does not represent a nutritional concern for humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM cotton varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable cotton COT102 seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102914462023-06-27 Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernández, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagli, Dafni Maria Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Camargo, Ana M Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Genetically modified cotton COT102 was developed to confer resistance against several lepidopteran species. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the differences in the agronomic‐phenotypic and compositional characteristics between cotton COT102 and its non‐GM comparator needs further assessment, except for levels of acid detergent fibre, which do not raise safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Vip3Aa19 and APH4 proteins as expressed in cotton COT102 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of cotton COT102. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from cotton COT102 does not represent a nutritional concern for humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM cotton varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable cotton COT102 seeds into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton COT102. The GMO Panel concludes that cotton COT102 is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM cotton varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10291446/ /pubmed/37377664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernández, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, José Ángel
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kagli, Dafni Maria
Lenzi, Paolo
Lewandowska, Aleksandra
Camargo, Ana M
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Raffaello, Tommaso
Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified cotton COT102 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐141)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified cotton cot102 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐de‐2017‐141)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377664
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8031
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT fernandezantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT goumperistilemachos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT kaglidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT lenzipaolo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT lewandowskaaleksandra assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT camargoanam assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottoncot102forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmode2017141