Cargando…

mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe

BACKGROUND: mHealth can help with healthcare service delivery for various health issues, but there's a significant gap in the availability and use of mHealth systems between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, despite the ongoing digitalization of the global healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: This work a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aboye, Genet Tadese, Vande Walle, Martijn, Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin, Aerts, Jean-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180972
_version_ 1785062715488731136
author Aboye, Genet Tadese
Vande Walle, Martijn
Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin
Aerts, Jean-Marie
author_facet Aboye, Genet Tadese
Vande Walle, Martijn
Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin
Aerts, Jean-Marie
author_sort Aboye, Genet Tadese
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: mHealth can help with healthcare service delivery for various health issues, but there's a significant gap in the availability and use of mHealth systems between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, despite the ongoing digitalization of the global healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to compare and investigate the use and availability of mHealth systems in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, and identify gaps in current mHealth development and implementation in both regions. METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for article search and selection to ensure an unbiased comparison between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe. Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed) were used, and articles were evaluated based on predetermined criteria. Details on the mHealth system type, goal, patient type, health concern, and development stage were collected and recorded in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. RESULTS: The search query produced 1020 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 2477 articles for Europe. After screening for eligibility, 86 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 297 articles for Europe were included. To minimize bias, two reviewers conducted the article screening and data retrieval. Sub-Saharan Africa used SMS and call-based mHealth methods for consultation and diagnosis, mainly for young patients such as children and mothers, and for issues such as HIV, pregnancy, childbirth, and child care. Europe relied more on apps, sensors, and wearables for monitoring, with the elderly as the most common patient group, and the most common health issues being cardiovascular disease and heart failure. CONCLUSION: Wearable technology and external sensors are heavily used in Europe, whereas they are seldom used in sub-Saharan Africa. More efforts should be made to use the mHealth system to improve health outcomes in both regions, incorporating more cutting-edge technologies like wearables internal and external sensors. Undertaking context-based studies, identifying determinants of mHealth systems use, and considering these determinants during mHealth system design could enhance mHealth availability and utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102915582023-06-27 mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe Aboye, Genet Tadese Vande Walle, Martijn Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin Aerts, Jean-Marie Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: mHealth can help with healthcare service delivery for various health issues, but there's a significant gap in the availability and use of mHealth systems between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, despite the ongoing digitalization of the global healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to compare and investigate the use and availability of mHealth systems in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, and identify gaps in current mHealth development and implementation in both regions. METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for article search and selection to ensure an unbiased comparison between sub-Saharan Africa and Europe. Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed) were used, and articles were evaluated based on predetermined criteria. Details on the mHealth system type, goal, patient type, health concern, and development stage were collected and recorded in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. RESULTS: The search query produced 1020 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 2477 articles for Europe. After screening for eligibility, 86 articles for sub-Saharan Africa and 297 articles for Europe were included. To minimize bias, two reviewers conducted the article screening and data retrieval. Sub-Saharan Africa used SMS and call-based mHealth methods for consultation and diagnosis, mainly for young patients such as children and mothers, and for issues such as HIV, pregnancy, childbirth, and child care. Europe relied more on apps, sensors, and wearables for monitoring, with the elderly as the most common patient group, and the most common health issues being cardiovascular disease and heart failure. CONCLUSION: Wearable technology and external sensors are heavily used in Europe, whereas they are seldom used in sub-Saharan Africa. More efforts should be made to use the mHealth system to improve health outcomes in both regions, incorporating more cutting-edge technologies like wearables internal and external sensors. Undertaking context-based studies, identifying determinants of mHealth systems use, and considering these determinants during mHealth system design could enhance mHealth availability and utilization. SAGE Publications 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10291558/ /pubmed/37377558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180972 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Aboye, Genet Tadese
Vande Walle, Martijn
Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin
Aerts, Jean-Marie
mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title_full mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title_fullStr mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title_full_unstemmed mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title_short mHealth in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe: A systematic review comparing the use and availability of mHealth approaches in sub-Saharan Africa and Europe
title_sort mhealth in sub-saharan africa and europe: a systematic review comparing the use and availability of mhealth approaches in sub-saharan africa and europe
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180972
work_keys_str_mv AT aboyegenettadese mhealthinsubsaharanafricaandeuropeasystematicreviewcomparingtheuseandavailabilityofmhealthapproachesinsubsaharanafricaandeurope
AT vandewallemartijn mhealthinsubsaharanafricaandeuropeasystematicreviewcomparingtheuseandavailabilityofmhealthapproachesinsubsaharanafricaandeurope
AT simegngizeaddislamesgin mhealthinsubsaharanafricaandeuropeasystematicreviewcomparingtheuseandavailabilityofmhealthapproachesinsubsaharanafricaandeurope
AT aertsjeanmarie mhealthinsubsaharanafricaandeuropeasystematicreviewcomparingtheuseandavailabilityofmhealthapproachesinsubsaharanafricaandeurope