Cargando…

Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are currently evaluated using computed tomography angiography and invasive cardiac catheterization as an essential part of case selection and pre-procedure interventional planning. However, both imaging methods utilize iodinat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prado, Guy F. A., Garzon, Stefano, Mariani, Jose, Caixeta, Adriano, O. Almeida, Breno, O. Ramalho, Felipe, C. Vieira, Marcelo L., Fischer, Claudio H., Szarf, Gilberto, Ishikawa, Walther, Lemos, Pedro A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2224888
_version_ 1785062779173994496
author Prado, Guy F. A.
Garzon, Stefano
Mariani, Jose
Caixeta, Adriano
O. Almeida, Breno
O. Ramalho, Felipe
C. Vieira, Marcelo L.
Fischer, Claudio H.
Szarf, Gilberto
Ishikawa, Walther
Lemos, Pedro A.
author_facet Prado, Guy F. A.
Garzon, Stefano
Mariani, Jose
Caixeta, Adriano
O. Almeida, Breno
O. Ramalho, Felipe
C. Vieira, Marcelo L.
Fischer, Claudio H.
Szarf, Gilberto
Ishikawa, Walther
Lemos, Pedro A.
author_sort Prado, Guy F. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are currently evaluated using computed tomography angiography and invasive cardiac catheterization as an essential part of case selection and pre-procedure interventional planning. However, both imaging methods utilize iodinated agents, which may cause contrast-induced nephropathy, particularly in patients with baseline renal dysfunction. This study aimed to describe a zero-contrast imaging protocol for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with advanced renal impairment. METHODS: The pre-TAVI zero-contrast scheme consisted of the following multi-modality combinations: (1) gadolinium-free magnetic resonance imaging (three-dimensional navigator-echo with electrocardiogram-gated steady-state free-precession series); (2) iodinated-free multislice computed tomography electrocardiogram-gated; (3) lower limb arterial duplex scan ultrasound; and (4) transesophageal echocardiography. Ultimately, TAVI was performed for those deemed good candidates, and contrast was allowed during the intervention; however, operators were strongly advised to utilize the least volume possible of iodinated agents. This pilot survey included ten patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and renal dysfunction who underwent zero-contrast multi-modality imaging. RESULTS: All the patients ultimately underwent TAVI. The intervention was successful in all cases, without ≥ moderate residual aortic regurgitation, prosthesis embolization, annulus rupture, major vascular complications, stroke, or death during index hospitalization. The creatinine clearance remained stable throughout the observation period (baseline: 26.85 ± 12.55 mL/min; after multi-modality imaging: 26.76 ± 11.51 mL/min; post-TAVI at discharge: 29.84 ± 13.98 mL/min; p = 0.3 all). CONCLUSION: The proposed contrast-free imaging protocol appears to be a promising clinical tool for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with severe renal dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10291906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102919062023-06-27 Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction Prado, Guy F. A. Garzon, Stefano Mariani, Jose Caixeta, Adriano O. Almeida, Breno O. Ramalho, Felipe C. Vieira, Marcelo L. Fischer, Claudio H. Szarf, Gilberto Ishikawa, Walther Lemos, Pedro A. Ren Fail Brief Report BACKGROUND: Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are currently evaluated using computed tomography angiography and invasive cardiac catheterization as an essential part of case selection and pre-procedure interventional planning. However, both imaging methods utilize iodinated agents, which may cause contrast-induced nephropathy, particularly in patients with baseline renal dysfunction. This study aimed to describe a zero-contrast imaging protocol for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with advanced renal impairment. METHODS: The pre-TAVI zero-contrast scheme consisted of the following multi-modality combinations: (1) gadolinium-free magnetic resonance imaging (three-dimensional navigator-echo with electrocardiogram-gated steady-state free-precession series); (2) iodinated-free multislice computed tomography electrocardiogram-gated; (3) lower limb arterial duplex scan ultrasound; and (4) transesophageal echocardiography. Ultimately, TAVI was performed for those deemed good candidates, and contrast was allowed during the intervention; however, operators were strongly advised to utilize the least volume possible of iodinated agents. This pilot survey included ten patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and renal dysfunction who underwent zero-contrast multi-modality imaging. RESULTS: All the patients ultimately underwent TAVI. The intervention was successful in all cases, without ≥ moderate residual aortic regurgitation, prosthesis embolization, annulus rupture, major vascular complications, stroke, or death during index hospitalization. The creatinine clearance remained stable throughout the observation period (baseline: 26.85 ± 12.55 mL/min; after multi-modality imaging: 26.76 ± 11.51 mL/min; post-TAVI at discharge: 29.84 ± 13.98 mL/min; p = 0.3 all). CONCLUSION: The proposed contrast-free imaging protocol appears to be a promising clinical tool for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with severe renal dysfunction. Taylor & Francis 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10291906/ /pubmed/37350345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2224888 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Prado, Guy F. A.
Garzon, Stefano
Mariani, Jose
Caixeta, Adriano
O. Almeida, Breno
O. Ramalho, Felipe
C. Vieira, Marcelo L.
Fischer, Claudio H.
Szarf, Gilberto
Ishikawa, Walther
Lemos, Pedro A.
Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title_full Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title_fullStr Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title_short Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
title_sort zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2224888
work_keys_str_mv AT pradoguyfa zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT garzonstefano zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT marianijose zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT caixetaadriano zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT oalmeidabreno zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT oramalhofelipe zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT cvieiramarcelol zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT fischerclaudioh zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT szarfgilberto zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT ishikawawalther zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction
AT lemospedroa zerocontrastimagingfortheassessmentoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationincandidateswithrenaldysfunction