Cargando…
Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study
BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation (MWA) is a standard percutaneous local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Next-generation MWA is reported to create a more spherical ablation zone than radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We compared the ablation zone and aspect ratio of two 2.45 GHz MWA ablation p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377842 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S412642 |
_version_ | 1785062852253450240 |
---|---|
author | Ishikawa, Toru Hasegawa, Iori Hirosawa, Hiroshi Honmou, Tsubasa Sakai, Nobuyuki Igarashi, Takanori Yamazaki, Shun Kobayashi, Takamasa Sato, Toshifumi Iwanaga, Akito Sano, Tomoe Yokoyama, Junji Honma, Terasu |
author_facet | Ishikawa, Toru Hasegawa, Iori Hirosawa, Hiroshi Honmou, Tsubasa Sakai, Nobuyuki Igarashi, Takanori Yamazaki, Shun Kobayashi, Takamasa Sato, Toshifumi Iwanaga, Akito Sano, Tomoe Yokoyama, Junji Honma, Terasu |
author_sort | Ishikawa, Toru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation (MWA) is a standard percutaneous local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Next-generation MWA is reported to create a more spherical ablation zone than radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We compared the ablation zone and aspect ratio of two 2.45 GHz MWA ablation probes; Emprint(®) (13G) and Mimapro(®) (17G). We compared the ablation zone to the applied energy after MWA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, we investigated local recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 20 patients with HCC, with an average tumour diameter of 33.2 ± 12.2 mm, who underwent MWA using Emprint(®), and 9 patients who underwent MWA using Mimapro(®) with an average tumour diameter of 31.1 ± 10.5 mm. Both groups underwent the same ablation protocol using the same power settings. The images obtained after MWA showed the treatment ablation zone and aspect ratio, which were measured and compared using three-dimensional image analysis software. RESULTS: The aspect ratios in the Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) groups were 0.786 ± 0.105 and 0.808 ± 0.122, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.604). The ablation time was significantly shorter in the Mimapro(®) group than in the Emprint(®) group, and there was no significant difference in the frequency of popping or the ablation volume. There were no significant differences in local recurrence between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the aspect ratios of the ablation diameter, and the ablation zone was almost spherical in both cases. Mimapro(®) at 17G was less invasive than Emprint(®) at 13G. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10292608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102926082023-06-27 Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study Ishikawa, Toru Hasegawa, Iori Hirosawa, Hiroshi Honmou, Tsubasa Sakai, Nobuyuki Igarashi, Takanori Yamazaki, Shun Kobayashi, Takamasa Sato, Toshifumi Iwanaga, Akito Sano, Tomoe Yokoyama, Junji Honma, Terasu J Hepatocell Carcinoma Short Report BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation (MWA) is a standard percutaneous local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Next-generation MWA is reported to create a more spherical ablation zone than radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We compared the ablation zone and aspect ratio of two 2.45 GHz MWA ablation probes; Emprint(®) (13G) and Mimapro(®) (17G). We compared the ablation zone to the applied energy after MWA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, we investigated local recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 20 patients with HCC, with an average tumour diameter of 33.2 ± 12.2 mm, who underwent MWA using Emprint(®), and 9 patients who underwent MWA using Mimapro(®) with an average tumour diameter of 31.1 ± 10.5 mm. Both groups underwent the same ablation protocol using the same power settings. The images obtained after MWA showed the treatment ablation zone and aspect ratio, which were measured and compared using three-dimensional image analysis software. RESULTS: The aspect ratios in the Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) groups were 0.786 ± 0.105 and 0.808 ± 0.122, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.604). The ablation time was significantly shorter in the Mimapro(®) group than in the Emprint(®) group, and there was no significant difference in the frequency of popping or the ablation volume. There were no significant differences in local recurrence between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the aspect ratios of the ablation diameter, and the ablation zone was almost spherical in both cases. Mimapro(®) at 17G was less invasive than Emprint(®) at 13G. Dove 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10292608/ /pubmed/37377842 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S412642 Text en © 2023 Ishikawa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Ishikawa, Toru Hasegawa, Iori Hirosawa, Hiroshi Honmou, Tsubasa Sakai, Nobuyuki Igarashi, Takanori Yamazaki, Shun Kobayashi, Takamasa Sato, Toshifumi Iwanaga, Akito Sano, Tomoe Yokoyama, Junji Honma, Terasu Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title | Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title_full | Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title_short | Comparison of Ablation Volume Between Emprint(®) and Mimapro(®) Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma –A Preliminary Study |
title_sort | comparison of ablation volume between emprint(®) and mimapro(®) systems for hepatocellular carcinoma –a preliminary study |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377842 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S412642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishikawatoru comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT hasegawaiori comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT hirosawahiroshi comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT honmoutsubasa comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT sakainobuyuki comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT igarashitakanori comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT yamazakishun comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT kobayashitakamasa comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT satotoshifumi comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT iwanagaakito comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT sanotomoe comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT yokoyamajunji comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy AT honmaterasu comparisonofablationvolumebetweenemprintandmimaprosystemsforhepatocellularcarcinomaapreliminarystudy |