Cargando…
Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study
OBJECTIVE: Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is common. Current guidelines promulgate a 3-month blanking period. We hypothesize that early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period may predict longer-term ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESUL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad173 |
_version_ | 1785062917799936000 |
---|---|
author | Noujaim, Charbel Lim, Chanho Mekhael, Mario Feng, Han Chouman, Nour Younes, Hadi Assaf, Ala Shan, Botao Shamaileh, Ghaith Dhore-Patil, Aneesh Nelson, Daniel Lanier, Brennan Makan, Noor Marrouche, Nassir Donnellan, Eoin |
author_facet | Noujaim, Charbel Lim, Chanho Mekhael, Mario Feng, Han Chouman, Nour Younes, Hadi Assaf, Ala Shan, Botao Shamaileh, Ghaith Dhore-Patil, Aneesh Nelson, Daniel Lanier, Brennan Makan, Noor Marrouche, Nassir Donnellan, Eoin |
author_sort | Noujaim, Charbel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is common. Current guidelines promulgate a 3-month blanking period. We hypothesize that early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period may predict longer-term ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 688 patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were included in the DECAAF II trial database. The primary endpoint of the study was the first confirmed recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Recurrence was also monitored during the 90-day blanking period. A total of 287 patients experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmia during the blanking period, while 401 remained in sinus rhythm. Rates of longer-term arrhythmia recurrence were substantially higher among those who developed recurrence during the blanking period compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm throughout the blanking period (68% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). The study cohort was divided into three groups according to the timing of arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period. Of those who had recurrent arrhythmia during the first month of the blanking period (Group 1), 43.9% experienced longer-term recurrence, compared to 61.6% who recurred during the second month of the blanking period (Group 2), and 93.3% of those who had arrhythmia recurrence during the third month (Group 3, P < 0.001). The risk of recurrent arrhythmia was highest in Group 3 (HR = 10.15), followed by Group 2 (HR = 2.35) and Group 1 (HR = 1.5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the timing of arrhythmia recurrence and the primary outcome (AUC = 0.746, P < 0.001). The optimal blanking period duration was identified as 34 days. Atrial fibrillation burden determined by smartphone electrocardiogram technology over the 18 months follow-up period was significantly higher in Group 3 (29%) compared to Groups 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) and in patients who stayed in sinus rhythm during the blanking period (5%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period, particularly during the third month, is significantly associated with later recurrence. Although a blanking period is warranted, it should be abbreviated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10292951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102929512023-06-27 Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study Noujaim, Charbel Lim, Chanho Mekhael, Mario Feng, Han Chouman, Nour Younes, Hadi Assaf, Ala Shan, Botao Shamaileh, Ghaith Dhore-Patil, Aneesh Nelson, Daniel Lanier, Brennan Makan, Noor Marrouche, Nassir Donnellan, Eoin Europace Clinical Research OBJECTIVE: Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is common. Current guidelines promulgate a 3-month blanking period. We hypothesize that early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period may predict longer-term ablation outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 688 patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were included in the DECAAF II trial database. The primary endpoint of the study was the first confirmed recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Recurrence was also monitored during the 90-day blanking period. A total of 287 patients experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmia during the blanking period, while 401 remained in sinus rhythm. Rates of longer-term arrhythmia recurrence were substantially higher among those who developed recurrence during the blanking period compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm throughout the blanking period (68% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). The study cohort was divided into three groups according to the timing of arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period. Of those who had recurrent arrhythmia during the first month of the blanking period (Group 1), 43.9% experienced longer-term recurrence, compared to 61.6% who recurred during the second month of the blanking period (Group 2), and 93.3% of those who had arrhythmia recurrence during the third month (Group 3, P < 0.001). The risk of recurrent arrhythmia was highest in Group 3 (HR = 10.15), followed by Group 2 (HR = 2.35) and Group 1 (HR = 1.5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the timing of arrhythmia recurrence and the primary outcome (AUC = 0.746, P < 0.001). The optimal blanking period duration was identified as 34 days. Atrial fibrillation burden determined by smartphone electrocardiogram technology over the 18 months follow-up period was significantly higher in Group 3 (29%) compared to Groups 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) and in patients who stayed in sinus rhythm during the blanking period (5%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period, particularly during the third month, is significantly associated with later recurrence. Although a blanking period is warranted, it should be abbreviated. Oxford University Press 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10292951/ /pubmed/37337683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad173 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Noujaim, Charbel Lim, Chanho Mekhael, Mario Feng, Han Chouman, Nour Younes, Hadi Assaf, Ala Shan, Botao Shamaileh, Ghaith Dhore-Patil, Aneesh Nelson, Daniel Lanier, Brennan Makan, Noor Marrouche, Nassir Donnellan, Eoin Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title | Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title_full | Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title_fullStr | Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title_short | Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study |
title_sort | identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the decaaf ii study |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noujaimcharbel identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT limchanho identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT mekhaelmario identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT fenghan identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT choumannour identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT youneshadi identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT assafala identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT shanbotao identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT shamailehghaith identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT dhorepatilaneesh identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT nelsondaniel identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT lanierbrennan identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT makannoor identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT marrouchenassir identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy AT donnellaneoin identifyingtheprognosticsignificanceofearlyarrhythmiarecurrenceduringtheblankingperiodandtheoptimalblankingperioddurationinsightsfromthedecaafiistudy |