Cargando…

Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CCPC) is a rare entity compared to acinar carcinoma of the prostate (APC). The survival rate and prognostic factors of CCPC are still unclear and deserve further study. We downloaded data on prostate cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Sijin, Song, Wei, Zhang, Ruochen, Jin, Yiming, Lu, Yan, Lin, Le, Ye, Liefu, Li, Tao, Wei, Yongbao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37092-2
_version_ 1785062936045158400
author Chen, Sijin
Song, Wei
Zhang, Ruochen
Jin, Yiming
Lu, Yan
Lin, Le
Ye, Liefu
Li, Tao
Wei, Yongbao
author_facet Chen, Sijin
Song, Wei
Zhang, Ruochen
Jin, Yiming
Lu, Yan
Lin, Le
Ye, Liefu
Li, Tao
Wei, Yongbao
author_sort Chen, Sijin
collection PubMed
description Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CCPC) is a rare entity compared to acinar carcinoma of the prostate (APC). The survival rate and prognostic factors of CCPC are still unclear and deserve further study. We downloaded data on prostate cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 1975–2019. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared APC and analyzed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in CCPC patients and prognostic risk factors using a propensity score matching (PSM) study and multivariate Cox regression. We included 408,004 cases of APC as a control group and 130 cases of CCPC as a case group. Compared with APC patients, the incidence of CCPC was extremely low, and the median age of diagnosis was older (72.00 years vs. 69.00 years, p < 0.01). In addition, more rates were diagnosed at an earlier stage (1975–1998, 93.1% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.001), more unstaged or unknown stage ratios (87.7% vs. 42.7%, p < 0.001), and more surgical treatments (66.2% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001), but the prognosis of CCPC patients was worse. After PSM, the median survival time of CCPC patients was shorter (57.50 month vs. 88.00 month, p < 0.01), the rate of CSM was higher (41.5% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.05), and the rate of OM was higher (99.2% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.01). In the adjusted model 2 after PSM, the CSM risk of CCPC patients reached HR 1.76 (95%CI 1.13–2.72), which was 76% higher than that of APC patients (p < 0.05). It was further found that surgical treatment might benefit CSM in CCPC patients (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.18–0.82, p < 0.05) in Univariate analysis, but it was insignificant in further multivariate analysis. This is the first large-scale case–control report on the survival risk and prognostic factors of CCPC patients. We found that the prognosis of CCPC patients was significantly worse than that of APC. Surgery might be an effective treatment that may improve its prognosis. Clear cell adenocarcinoma, prostate, acinar carcinoma, survival rate, rare cancer, propensity score matching, case–control study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102931672023-06-28 Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity Chen, Sijin Song, Wei Zhang, Ruochen Jin, Yiming Lu, Yan Lin, Le Ye, Liefu Li, Tao Wei, Yongbao Sci Rep Article Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CCPC) is a rare entity compared to acinar carcinoma of the prostate (APC). The survival rate and prognostic factors of CCPC are still unclear and deserve further study. We downloaded data on prostate cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 1975–2019. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared APC and analyzed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in CCPC patients and prognostic risk factors using a propensity score matching (PSM) study and multivariate Cox regression. We included 408,004 cases of APC as a control group and 130 cases of CCPC as a case group. Compared with APC patients, the incidence of CCPC was extremely low, and the median age of diagnosis was older (72.00 years vs. 69.00 years, p < 0.01). In addition, more rates were diagnosed at an earlier stage (1975–1998, 93.1% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.001), more unstaged or unknown stage ratios (87.7% vs. 42.7%, p < 0.001), and more surgical treatments (66.2% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001), but the prognosis of CCPC patients was worse. After PSM, the median survival time of CCPC patients was shorter (57.50 month vs. 88.00 month, p < 0.01), the rate of CSM was higher (41.5% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.05), and the rate of OM was higher (99.2% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.01). In the adjusted model 2 after PSM, the CSM risk of CCPC patients reached HR 1.76 (95%CI 1.13–2.72), which was 76% higher than that of APC patients (p < 0.05). It was further found that surgical treatment might benefit CSM in CCPC patients (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.18–0.82, p < 0.05) in Univariate analysis, but it was insignificant in further multivariate analysis. This is the first large-scale case–control report on the survival risk and prognostic factors of CCPC patients. We found that the prognosis of CCPC patients was significantly worse than that of APC. Surgery might be an effective treatment that may improve its prognosis. Clear cell adenocarcinoma, prostate, acinar carcinoma, survival rate, rare cancer, propensity score matching, case–control study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10293167/ /pubmed/37365217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37092-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Sijin
Song, Wei
Zhang, Ruochen
Jin, Yiming
Lu, Yan
Lin, Le
Ye, Liefu
Li, Tao
Wei, Yongbao
Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title_full Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title_fullStr Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title_short Analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
title_sort analysis of survival and prognostic factors of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a case–control study for a rare cancer entity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37092-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chensijin analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT songwei analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT zhangruochen analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT jinyiming analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT luyan analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT linle analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT yeliefu analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT litao analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity
AT weiyongbao analysisofsurvivalandprognosticfactorsofclearcelladenocarcinomaoftheprostateacasecontrolstudyforararecancerentity