Cargando…

Improvised intracranial pressure monitoring devices for traumatic brain injury management in a low-income environment: A single-centre randomised study demonstrating feasibility

BACKGROUND: The high cost and non-availability of standard ICP monitoring devices limit their use in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. This study aims to demonstrate the use of an improvised intraventricular ICP monitoring device as a feasible alternative. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are improvi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usuah, John, Jesuyajolu, Damilola, Bankole, Olufemi, Ojo, Omotayo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.101737
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The high cost and non-availability of standard ICP monitoring devices limit their use in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. This study aims to demonstrate the use of an improvised intraventricular ICP monitoring device as a feasible alternative. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are improvised ICP Monitoring devices feasible and effective in resource-constrained settings? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a prospective single-institution investigation involving 54 adult patients that presented with severe TBI (GCS of 3–8) within 72 ​h of injury and required operative intervention. All patients underwent craniotomy or primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) to evacuate traumatic mass lesions. 14-day in-hospital mortality was used as a primary endpoint of the study. 25 patients had ICP monitoring postoperatively using the improvised device. RESULTS: The modified ICP device was replicated using a feeding tube and a manometer with 0.9% saline as a coupling agent. Based on hourly ICP recording (up to 72 ​h), patients were observed as having high ICP (>27 ​cm H(2)O) and normal ICP (27 ​cm H(2)O). In the ICP-monitored group, raised ICP was detected more than in the clinically assessed group (84% vs 12% p= <0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There was a 3-time higher mortality rate among the non-ICP monitored participants (31%) compared to the ICP-monitored participants (12%), although this did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size. This preliminary study has shown that this modified ICP monitoring system is a relatively feasible alternative for diagnosing and treating elevated ICP in severe TBI in resource-constrained environments.