Cargando…

The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer. DESIGN: Systematic review. PATIENTS: Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET). INTERVENTIONS: We conducted an extensive database search of Medline (PubMed), Embase, W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almohammadi, Abdulla, Raveendran, Ainharan, Black, Mairead, Maheshwari, Abha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06674-2
_version_ 1785062988550504448
author Almohammadi, Abdulla
Raveendran, Ainharan
Black, Mairead
Maheshwari, Abha
author_facet Almohammadi, Abdulla
Raveendran, Ainharan
Black, Mairead
Maheshwari, Abha
author_sort Almohammadi, Abdulla
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer. DESIGN: Systematic review. PATIENTS: Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET). INTERVENTIONS: We conducted an extensive database search of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Trials Register using relevant keywords and their combinations to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the routes (i.e., oral, vaginal, intramuscular) of progesterone administration for luteal phase support (LPS) in artificial FET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage. RESULTS: Four RCTs with 3245 participants undergoing artificial endometrial preparation (EP) cycles during FET were found to be eligible. Four trials compared vaginal progesterone with intramuscular progesterone and two trials compared vaginal progesterone with oral progesterone. One study favored of vaginal versus oral progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22–0.92) and other study favored intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21–1.76) and live birth rates (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28–2.05). Tabulation of overall evidence strength assessment showed low-quality evidence on the basis that for each outcome-comparison pair, there were deficiencies in either directness of outcome measurement or study quality. CONCLUSION: There was little consensus and evidence was heterogeneous on the optimal route of administration of progesterone for LPS during FET in artificial EP cycles. This warrants more trials, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analyses. PROPERO NO: CRD42021251017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102933782023-06-28 The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review Almohammadi, Abdulla Raveendran, Ainharan Black, Mairead Maheshwari, Abha Arch Gynecol Obstet Review OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer. DESIGN: Systematic review. PATIENTS: Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET). INTERVENTIONS: We conducted an extensive database search of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Trials Register using relevant keywords and their combinations to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the routes (i.e., oral, vaginal, intramuscular) of progesterone administration for luteal phase support (LPS) in artificial FET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage. RESULTS: Four RCTs with 3245 participants undergoing artificial endometrial preparation (EP) cycles during FET were found to be eligible. Four trials compared vaginal progesterone with intramuscular progesterone and two trials compared vaginal progesterone with oral progesterone. One study favored of vaginal versus oral progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22–0.92) and other study favored intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone for clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21–1.76) and live birth rates (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28–2.05). Tabulation of overall evidence strength assessment showed low-quality evidence on the basis that for each outcome-comparison pair, there were deficiencies in either directness of outcome measurement or study quality. CONCLUSION: There was little consensus and evidence was heterogeneous on the optimal route of administration of progesterone for LPS during FET in artificial EP cycles. This warrants more trials, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analyses. PROPERO NO: CRD42021251017. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10293378/ /pubmed/35943567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06674-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Almohammadi, Abdulla
Raveendran, Ainharan
Black, Mairead
Maheshwari, Abha
The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title_full The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title_fullStr The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title_short The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
title_sort optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in a frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06674-2
work_keys_str_mv AT almohammadiabdulla theoptimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT raveendranainharan theoptimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT blackmairead theoptimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT maheshwariabha theoptimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT almohammadiabdulla optimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT raveendranainharan optimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT blackmairead optimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview
AT maheshwariabha optimalrouteofprogesteroneadministrationforlutealphasesupportinafrozenembryotransferasystematicreview