Cargando…

Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently involve the posterior malleolus. Many classifications describing posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) exist. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic literature review to outline existing PMF classifications and estimate their accuracy. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terstegen, Julia, Weel, Hanneke, Frosch, Karl-Heinz, Rolvien, Tim, Schlickewei, Carsten, Mueller, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04643-7
_version_ 1785062993052041216
author Terstegen, Julia
Weel, Hanneke
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Rolvien, Tim
Schlickewei, Carsten
Mueller, Elena
author_facet Terstegen, Julia
Weel, Hanneke
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Rolvien, Tim
Schlickewei, Carsten
Mueller, Elena
author_sort Terstegen, Julia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently involve the posterior malleolus. Many classifications describing posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) exist. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic literature review to outline existing PMF classifications and estimate their accuracy. METHODS: The databases PubMed and Scopus were searched without time limits. Only specific PMF classifications were included; general ankle and/or pilon fracture classifications were excluded. Selection and data extraction was performed by three independent observers. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies with a total of 12.614 patients were included. Four main classifications were identified: Those describing the size of the posterior malleolar fracture (n = 66), Haraguchi (n = 44), Bartoníček/Rammelt (n = 21) and Mason (n = 12). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a median Coleman-score of 43.5 (14–79) and a weighted median Coleman-score of 42.5 points. All classifications achieved a substantial to perfect score regarding the inter- and intraobserver reliability, with Mason scoring the lowest in comparison. CONCLUSIONS: None of the reviewed PMF classifications has been able to establish itself decisively in the literature. Most of the classifications are insufficient in terms of a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with regard to outcome. However, as the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification has the greatest potential due to its treatment algorithm, its reliability in combination with consistent predictive values, its usage in clinical practice and research appears advisable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-022-04643-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102933982023-06-28 Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review Terstegen, Julia Weel, Hanneke Frosch, Karl-Heinz Rolvien, Tim Schlickewei, Carsten Mueller, Elena Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery INTRODUCTION: Complex ankle fractures frequently involve the posterior malleolus. Many classifications describing posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) exist. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic literature review to outline existing PMF classifications and estimate their accuracy. METHODS: The databases PubMed and Scopus were searched without time limits. Only specific PMF classifications were included; general ankle and/or pilon fracture classifications were excluded. Selection and data extraction was performed by three independent observers. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies with a total of 12.614 patients were included. Four main classifications were identified: Those describing the size of the posterior malleolar fracture (n = 66), Haraguchi (n = 44), Bartoníček/Rammelt (n = 21) and Mason (n = 12). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a median Coleman-score of 43.5 (14–79) and a weighted median Coleman-score of 42.5 points. All classifications achieved a substantial to perfect score regarding the inter- and intraobserver reliability, with Mason scoring the lowest in comparison. CONCLUSIONS: None of the reviewed PMF classifications has been able to establish itself decisively in the literature. Most of the classifications are insufficient in terms of a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with regard to outcome. However, as the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification has the greatest potential due to its treatment algorithm, its reliability in combination with consistent predictive values, its usage in clinical practice and research appears advisable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-022-04643-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10293398/ /pubmed/36469121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04643-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Trauma Surgery
Terstegen, Julia
Weel, Hanneke
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Rolvien, Tim
Schlickewei, Carsten
Mueller, Elena
Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title_full Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title_short Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
title_sort classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review
topic Trauma Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04643-7
work_keys_str_mv AT terstegenjulia classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview
AT weelhanneke classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview
AT froschkarlheinz classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview
AT rolvientim classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview
AT schlickeweicarsten classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview
AT muellerelena classificationsofposteriormalleolarfracturesasystematicliteraturereview