Cargando…

Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?

BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hipfl, Christian, Leopold, Vincent, Becker, Luis, Pumberger, Matthias, Perka, Carsten, Hardt, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3
_version_ 1785062997381611520
author Hipfl, Christian
Leopold, Vincent
Becker, Luis
Pumberger, Matthias
Perka, Carsten
Hardt, Sebastian
author_facet Hipfl, Christian
Leopold, Vincent
Becker, Luis
Pumberger, Matthias
Perka, Carsten
Hardt, Sebastian
author_sort Hipfl, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to compare the results of two-stage revision for PJI in cemented and cementless THA. METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage revision THA for PJI between 2013 and 2018. Thirty-six patients with a fully cemented (n = 6), hybrid femur (n = 26) or hybrid acetabulum (n = 4) THA (cemented group) were matched 1:2 with a cohort of 72 patients who underwent removal of a cementless THA (cementless group). Groups were matched by sex, age, number of prior surgeries and history of infection treatment. Outcomes included microbiological results, interim re-debridement, reinfection, all-cause revision, and modified Harris hip scores (mHHS). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with PJI in cementless THA, patients undergoing removal of cemented THA had increasingly severe femoral bone loss (p = 0.004). Patients in the cemented group had an increased risk for positive cultures during second-stage reimplantation (22% compared to 8%, p = 0.043), higher rates of reinfection (22% compared to 7%, p = 0.021) and all-cause revision (31% compared to 14%, p = 0.039) compared to patients undergoing two-stage revision of cementless THA. Periprosthetic femoral fractures were more frequent in the group of patients with prior cementation (p = .004). Mean mHHS had been 37.5 in the cemented group and 39.1 in the cementless group, and these scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that chronic infection in cemented THA might be associated with increased bone loss, higher rates of reinfection and all-cause revision following two-stage revision. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients with hip PJI and can guide treatment and estimated outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102934162023-06-28 Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? Hipfl, Christian Leopold, Vincent Becker, Luis Pumberger, Matthias Perka, Carsten Hardt, Sebastian Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to compare the results of two-stage revision for PJI in cemented and cementless THA. METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage revision THA for PJI between 2013 and 2018. Thirty-six patients with a fully cemented (n = 6), hybrid femur (n = 26) or hybrid acetabulum (n = 4) THA (cemented group) were matched 1:2 with a cohort of 72 patients who underwent removal of a cementless THA (cementless group). Groups were matched by sex, age, number of prior surgeries and history of infection treatment. Outcomes included microbiological results, interim re-debridement, reinfection, all-cause revision, and modified Harris hip scores (mHHS). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with PJI in cementless THA, patients undergoing removal of cemented THA had increasingly severe femoral bone loss (p = 0.004). Patients in the cemented group had an increased risk for positive cultures during second-stage reimplantation (22% compared to 8%, p = 0.043), higher rates of reinfection (22% compared to 7%, p = 0.021) and all-cause revision (31% compared to 14%, p = 0.039) compared to patients undergoing two-stage revision of cementless THA. Periprosthetic femoral fractures were more frequent in the group of patients with prior cementation (p = .004). Mean mHHS had been 37.5 in the cemented group and 39.1 in the cementless group, and these scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that chronic infection in cemented THA might be associated with increased bone loss, higher rates of reinfection and all-cause revision following two-stage revision. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients with hip PJI and can guide treatment and estimated outcomes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10293416/ /pubmed/36323976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Hipfl, Christian
Leopold, Vincent
Becker, Luis
Pumberger, Matthias
Perka, Carsten
Hardt, Sebastian
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title_full Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title_fullStr Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title_full_unstemmed Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title_short Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
title_sort two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hipflchristian twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure
AT leopoldvincent twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure
AT beckerluis twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure
AT pumbergermatthias twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure
AT perkacarsten twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure
AT hardtsebastian twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure