Cargando…
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3 |
_version_ | 1785062997381611520 |
---|---|
author | Hipfl, Christian Leopold, Vincent Becker, Luis Pumberger, Matthias Perka, Carsten Hardt, Sebastian |
author_facet | Hipfl, Christian Leopold, Vincent Becker, Luis Pumberger, Matthias Perka, Carsten Hardt, Sebastian |
author_sort | Hipfl, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to compare the results of two-stage revision for PJI in cemented and cementless THA. METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage revision THA for PJI between 2013 and 2018. Thirty-six patients with a fully cemented (n = 6), hybrid femur (n = 26) or hybrid acetabulum (n = 4) THA (cemented group) were matched 1:2 with a cohort of 72 patients who underwent removal of a cementless THA (cementless group). Groups were matched by sex, age, number of prior surgeries and history of infection treatment. Outcomes included microbiological results, interim re-debridement, reinfection, all-cause revision, and modified Harris hip scores (mHHS). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with PJI in cementless THA, patients undergoing removal of cemented THA had increasingly severe femoral bone loss (p = 0.004). Patients in the cemented group had an increased risk for positive cultures during second-stage reimplantation (22% compared to 8%, p = 0.043), higher rates of reinfection (22% compared to 7%, p = 0.021) and all-cause revision (31% compared to 14%, p = 0.039) compared to patients undergoing two-stage revision of cementless THA. Periprosthetic femoral fractures were more frequent in the group of patients with prior cementation (p = .004). Mean mHHS had been 37.5 in the cemented group and 39.1 in the cementless group, and these scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that chronic infection in cemented THA might be associated with increased bone loss, higher rates of reinfection and all-cause revision following two-stage revision. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients with hip PJI and can guide treatment and estimated outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10293416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102934162023-06-28 Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? Hipfl, Christian Leopold, Vincent Becker, Luis Pumberger, Matthias Perka, Carsten Hardt, Sebastian Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: The impact of the prior fixation mode on the treatment outcome of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is unclear. Removal of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is particularly challenging and residual cement might be associated with reinfection. This study seeks to compare the results of two-stage revision for PJI in cemented and cementless THA. METHODS: We reviewed 143 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage revision THA for PJI between 2013 and 2018. Thirty-six patients with a fully cemented (n = 6), hybrid femur (n = 26) or hybrid acetabulum (n = 4) THA (cemented group) were matched 1:2 with a cohort of 72 patients who underwent removal of a cementless THA (cementless group). Groups were matched by sex, age, number of prior surgeries and history of infection treatment. Outcomes included microbiological results, interim re-debridement, reinfection, all-cause revision, and modified Harris hip scores (mHHS). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with PJI in cementless THA, patients undergoing removal of cemented THA had increasingly severe femoral bone loss (p = 0.004). Patients in the cemented group had an increased risk for positive cultures during second-stage reimplantation (22% compared to 8%, p = 0.043), higher rates of reinfection (22% compared to 7%, p = 0.021) and all-cause revision (31% compared to 14%, p = 0.039) compared to patients undergoing two-stage revision of cementless THA. Periprosthetic femoral fractures were more frequent in the group of patients with prior cementation (p = .004). Mean mHHS had been 37.5 in the cemented group and 39.1 in the cementless group, and these scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that chronic infection in cemented THA might be associated with increased bone loss, higher rates of reinfection and all-cause revision following two-stage revision. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients with hip PJI and can guide treatment and estimated outcomes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10293416/ /pubmed/36323976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Hip Arthroplasty Hipfl, Christian Leopold, Vincent Becker, Luis Pumberger, Matthias Perka, Carsten Hardt, Sebastian Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title | Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title_full | Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title_fullStr | Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title_short | Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
title_sort | two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure? |
topic | Hip Arthroplasty |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hipflchristian twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure AT leopoldvincent twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure AT beckerluis twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure AT pumbergermatthias twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure AT perkacarsten twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure AT hardtsebastian twostagerevisionforperiprostheticjointinfectionincementedtotalhiparthroplastyanincreasedriskforfailure |