Cargando…

Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?

Network hyperexcitability (NH) is an important feature of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Functional connectivity (FC) of brain networks has been proposed as a potential biomarker for NH. Here we use a whole brain computational model and resting-state MEG recordings to investigate the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stam, C. J., van Nifterick, A. M., de Haan, W., Gouw, A. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00968-7
_version_ 1785063007628296192
author Stam, C. J.
van Nifterick, A. M.
de Haan, W.
Gouw, A. A.
author_facet Stam, C. J.
van Nifterick, A. M.
de Haan, W.
Gouw, A. A.
author_sort Stam, C. J.
collection PubMed
description Network hyperexcitability (NH) is an important feature of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Functional connectivity (FC) of brain networks has been proposed as a potential biomarker for NH. Here we use a whole brain computational model and resting-state MEG recordings to investigate the relation between hyperexcitability and FC. Oscillatory brain activity was simulated with a Stuart Landau model on a network of 78 interconnected brain regions. FC was quantified with amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) and phase coherence (PC). MEG was recorded in 18 subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and 18 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Functional connectivity was determined with the corrected AECc and phase lag index (PLI), in the 4–8 Hz and the 8–13 Hz bands. The excitation/inhibition balance in the model had a strong effect on both AEC and PC. This effect was different for AEC and PC, and was influenced by structural coupling strength and frequency band. Empirical FC matrices of SCD and MCI showed a good correlation with model FC for AEC, but less so for PC. For AEC the fit was best in the hyperexcitable range. We conclude that FC is sensitive to changes in E/I balance. The AEC was more sensitive than the PLI, and results were better for the thetaband than the alpha band. This conclusion was supported by fitting the model to empirical data. Our study justifies the use of functional connectivity measures as surrogate markers for E/I balance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10548-023-00968-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102934632023-06-28 Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker? Stam, C. J. van Nifterick, A. M. de Haan, W. Gouw, A. A. Brain Topogr Original Paper Network hyperexcitability (NH) is an important feature of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Functional connectivity (FC) of brain networks has been proposed as a potential biomarker for NH. Here we use a whole brain computational model and resting-state MEG recordings to investigate the relation between hyperexcitability and FC. Oscillatory brain activity was simulated with a Stuart Landau model on a network of 78 interconnected brain regions. FC was quantified with amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) and phase coherence (PC). MEG was recorded in 18 subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and 18 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Functional connectivity was determined with the corrected AECc and phase lag index (PLI), in the 4–8 Hz and the 8–13 Hz bands. The excitation/inhibition balance in the model had a strong effect on both AEC and PC. This effect was different for AEC and PC, and was influenced by structural coupling strength and frequency band. Empirical FC matrices of SCD and MCI showed a good correlation with model FC for AEC, but less so for PC. For AEC the fit was best in the hyperexcitable range. We conclude that FC is sensitive to changes in E/I balance. The AEC was more sensitive than the PLI, and results were better for the thetaband than the alpha band. This conclusion was supported by fitting the model to empirical data. Our study justifies the use of functional connectivity measures as surrogate markers for E/I balance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10548-023-00968-7. Springer US 2023-05-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10293463/ /pubmed/37173584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00968-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Stam, C. J.
van Nifterick, A. M.
de Haan, W.
Gouw, A. A.
Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title_full Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title_fullStr Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title_full_unstemmed Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title_short Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?
title_sort network hyperexcitability in early alzheimer’s disease: is functional connectivity a potential biomarker?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00968-7
work_keys_str_mv AT stamcj networkhyperexcitabilityinearlyalzheimersdiseaseisfunctionalconnectivityapotentialbiomarker
AT vannifterickam networkhyperexcitabilityinearlyalzheimersdiseaseisfunctionalconnectivityapotentialbiomarker
AT dehaanw networkhyperexcitabilityinearlyalzheimersdiseaseisfunctionalconnectivityapotentialbiomarker
AT gouwaa networkhyperexcitabilityinearlyalzheimersdiseaseisfunctionalconnectivityapotentialbiomarker