Cargando…
Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review
Falls prevention in hospital continues to be a research priority because of the poor health outcomes and financial burdens that can arise. Recently updated World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management strongly recommend evaluating patients’ concerns about falling as part of a multifactorial...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00603-w |
_version_ | 1785063011148365824 |
---|---|
author | Dabkowski, Elissa Missen, Karen Duncan, Jhodie Cooper, Simon |
author_facet | Dabkowski, Elissa Missen, Karen Duncan, Jhodie Cooper, Simon |
author_sort | Dabkowski, Elissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Falls prevention in hospital continues to be a research priority because of the poor health outcomes and financial burdens that can arise. Recently updated World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management strongly recommend evaluating patients’ concerns about falling as part of a multifactorial assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of falls risk perception measures for adults in a hospital setting. This review was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines and provides a comprehensive summary of these instruments, including psychometric properties, feasibility and clinical recommendations for their use. The review followed a prospectively registered protocol, in which a total of ten databases were searched between the years 2002 and 2022. Studies were included if the instruments measured falls risk perception and/or other psychological falls constructs, if they were conducted in a hospital setting and if the target population contained hospital inpatients. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 20 falls risk perception measures. These falls risk perception instruments were grouped into five falls-related constructs: Balance Confidence, Falls Efficacy/Concern, Fear of Falling, Self-Awareness and Behaviour/Intention. Two of the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) received Class A recommendations (Falls Risk Perception Questionnaire and the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale); however, this rating is only applicable for the populations/context described in the studies. Thirteen PROMs received Class B recommendations, solidifying the need for further validation studies of these PROMs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00603-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10293508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102935082023-06-28 Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review Dabkowski, Elissa Missen, Karen Duncan, Jhodie Cooper, Simon J Patient Rep Outcomes Review Falls prevention in hospital continues to be a research priority because of the poor health outcomes and financial burdens that can arise. Recently updated World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management strongly recommend evaluating patients’ concerns about falling as part of a multifactorial assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of falls risk perception measures for adults in a hospital setting. This review was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines and provides a comprehensive summary of these instruments, including psychometric properties, feasibility and clinical recommendations for their use. The review followed a prospectively registered protocol, in which a total of ten databases were searched between the years 2002 and 2022. Studies were included if the instruments measured falls risk perception and/or other psychological falls constructs, if they were conducted in a hospital setting and if the target population contained hospital inpatients. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 20 falls risk perception measures. These falls risk perception instruments were grouped into five falls-related constructs: Balance Confidence, Falls Efficacy/Concern, Fear of Falling, Self-Awareness and Behaviour/Intention. Two of the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) received Class A recommendations (Falls Risk Perception Questionnaire and the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale); however, this rating is only applicable for the populations/context described in the studies. Thirteen PROMs received Class B recommendations, solidifying the need for further validation studies of these PROMs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00603-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10293508/ /pubmed/37358752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00603-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Dabkowski, Elissa Missen, Karen Duncan, Jhodie Cooper, Simon Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title | Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title_full | Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title_fullStr | Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title_short | Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review |
title_sort | falls risk perception measures in hospital: a cosmin systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00603-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dabkowskielissa fallsriskperceptionmeasuresinhospitalacosminsystematicreview AT missenkaren fallsriskperceptionmeasuresinhospitalacosminsystematicreview AT duncanjhodie fallsriskperceptionmeasuresinhospitalacosminsystematicreview AT coopersimon fallsriskperceptionmeasuresinhospitalacosminsystematicreview |