Cargando…

Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aykanat, Faruk, Kose, Ozkan, Guneri, Bulent, Celik, H. Kursat, Cakar, Albert, Tasatan, Ersin, Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6
_version_ 1785063016215085056
author Aykanat, Faruk
Kose, Ozkan
Guneri, Bulent
Celik, H. Kursat
Cakar, Albert
Tasatan, Ersin
Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena
author_facet Aykanat, Faruk
Kose, Ozkan
Guneri, Bulent
Celik, H. Kursat
Cakar, Albert
Tasatan, Ersin
Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena
author_sort Aykanat, Faruk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fulkerson osteotomy was modeled using computerized tomography (CT) data of a patient with patellofemoral instability and fixed with four different screw configurations using two 4.5 mm cortical screws in the axial plane. The configurations were as follows: (1) two screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, (2) two screws perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, (3) the upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, but the lower screw is perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, and (4) the reverse position of the screw configuration in the third scenario. Gap formation, sliding, displacement, frictional stress, and deformation of the components were calculated and reported. RESULTS: The osteotomy fragment moved superiorly after loading the models with 1654 N patellar tendon traction force. Since the proximal cut is sloped (bevel-cut osteotomy), the osteotomy fragment slid and rested on the upper tibial surface. Afterward, the upper surface of the osteotomy fragment acted as a fulcrum, and the distal part of the fragment began to separate from the tibia while the screws resisted the displacement. The resultant total displacement was 0.319 mm, 0.307 mm, 0.333 mm, and 0.245 mm from the first scenario to the fourth scenario, respectively. The minimum displacement was detected in the fourth scenario (upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and lower screw perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex). Maximum frictional stress and maximum pressure between components on both surfaces were highest in the first scenario (both screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane). CONCLUSIONS: A divergent screw configuration in which the upper screw is inserted perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and the lower screw is inserted perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex might be a better option for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. Level of evidence Level V, mechanism-based reasoning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102935522023-06-28 Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis Aykanat, Faruk Kose, Ozkan Guneri, Bulent Celik, H. Kursat Cakar, Albert Tasatan, Ersin Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fulkerson osteotomy was modeled using computerized tomography (CT) data of a patient with patellofemoral instability and fixed with four different screw configurations using two 4.5 mm cortical screws in the axial plane. The configurations were as follows: (1) two screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, (2) two screws perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, (3) the upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, but the lower screw is perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, and (4) the reverse position of the screw configuration in the third scenario. Gap formation, sliding, displacement, frictional stress, and deformation of the components were calculated and reported. RESULTS: The osteotomy fragment moved superiorly after loading the models with 1654 N patellar tendon traction force. Since the proximal cut is sloped (bevel-cut osteotomy), the osteotomy fragment slid and rested on the upper tibial surface. Afterward, the upper surface of the osteotomy fragment acted as a fulcrum, and the distal part of the fragment began to separate from the tibia while the screws resisted the displacement. The resultant total displacement was 0.319 mm, 0.307 mm, 0.333 mm, and 0.245 mm from the first scenario to the fourth scenario, respectively. The minimum displacement was detected in the fourth scenario (upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and lower screw perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex). Maximum frictional stress and maximum pressure between components on both surfaces were highest in the first scenario (both screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane). CONCLUSIONS: A divergent screw configuration in which the upper screw is inserted perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and the lower screw is inserted perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex might be a better option for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. Level of evidence Level V, mechanism-based reasoning. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-26 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10293552/ /pubmed/37358664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aykanat, Faruk
Kose, Ozkan
Guneri, Bulent
Celik, H. Kursat
Cakar, Albert
Tasatan, Ersin
Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena
Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title_full Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title_short Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
title_sort comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6
work_keys_str_mv AT aykanatfaruk comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT koseozkan comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT guneribulent comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT celikhkursat comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT cakaralbert comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT tasatanersin comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis
AT ulmeanumihaelaelena comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis