Cargando…
Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6 |
_version_ | 1785063016215085056 |
---|---|
author | Aykanat, Faruk Kose, Ozkan Guneri, Bulent Celik, H. Kursat Cakar, Albert Tasatan, Ersin Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena |
author_facet | Aykanat, Faruk Kose, Ozkan Guneri, Bulent Celik, H. Kursat Cakar, Albert Tasatan, Ersin Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena |
author_sort | Aykanat, Faruk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fulkerson osteotomy was modeled using computerized tomography (CT) data of a patient with patellofemoral instability and fixed with four different screw configurations using two 4.5 mm cortical screws in the axial plane. The configurations were as follows: (1) two screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, (2) two screws perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, (3) the upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, but the lower screw is perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, and (4) the reverse position of the screw configuration in the third scenario. Gap formation, sliding, displacement, frictional stress, and deformation of the components were calculated and reported. RESULTS: The osteotomy fragment moved superiorly after loading the models with 1654 N patellar tendon traction force. Since the proximal cut is sloped (bevel-cut osteotomy), the osteotomy fragment slid and rested on the upper tibial surface. Afterward, the upper surface of the osteotomy fragment acted as a fulcrum, and the distal part of the fragment began to separate from the tibia while the screws resisted the displacement. The resultant total displacement was 0.319 mm, 0.307 mm, 0.333 mm, and 0.245 mm from the first scenario to the fourth scenario, respectively. The minimum displacement was detected in the fourth scenario (upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and lower screw perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex). Maximum frictional stress and maximum pressure between components on both surfaces were highest in the first scenario (both screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane). CONCLUSIONS: A divergent screw configuration in which the upper screw is inserted perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and the lower screw is inserted perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex might be a better option for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. Level of evidence Level V, mechanism-based reasoning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10293552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102935522023-06-28 Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis Aykanat, Faruk Kose, Ozkan Guneri, Bulent Celik, H. Kursat Cakar, Albert Tasatan, Ersin Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Conventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fulkerson osteotomy was modeled using computerized tomography (CT) data of a patient with patellofemoral instability and fixed with four different screw configurations using two 4.5 mm cortical screws in the axial plane. The configurations were as follows: (1) two screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, (2) two screws perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, (3) the upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, but the lower screw is perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, and (4) the reverse position of the screw configuration in the third scenario. Gap formation, sliding, displacement, frictional stress, and deformation of the components were calculated and reported. RESULTS: The osteotomy fragment moved superiorly after loading the models with 1654 N patellar tendon traction force. Since the proximal cut is sloped (bevel-cut osteotomy), the osteotomy fragment slid and rested on the upper tibial surface. Afterward, the upper surface of the osteotomy fragment acted as a fulcrum, and the distal part of the fragment began to separate from the tibia while the screws resisted the displacement. The resultant total displacement was 0.319 mm, 0.307 mm, 0.333 mm, and 0.245 mm from the first scenario to the fourth scenario, respectively. The minimum displacement was detected in the fourth scenario (upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and lower screw perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex). Maximum frictional stress and maximum pressure between components on both surfaces were highest in the first scenario (both screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane). CONCLUSIONS: A divergent screw configuration in which the upper screw is inserted perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and the lower screw is inserted perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex might be a better option for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. Level of evidence Level V, mechanism-based reasoning. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-26 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10293552/ /pubmed/37358664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aykanat, Faruk Kose, Ozkan Guneri, Bulent Celik, H. Kursat Cakar, Albert Tasatan, Ersin Ulmeanu, Mihaela-Elena Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title | Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_full | Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_short | Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_sort | comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00714-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aykanatfaruk comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT koseozkan comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT guneribulent comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT celikhkursat comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT cakaralbert comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT tasatanersin comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT ulmeanumihaelaelena comparisonoffourdifferentscrewconfigurationsforthefixationoffulkersonosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis |