Cargando…

Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria

OBJECTIVES: REDUCE-IT showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in participants with established CV disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) and at least one additional risk factor plus mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and reasonably controlled low-density lipoprotein c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Subodh, Kosmopoulos, Andrew, Bhatt, Deepak L., Fitchett, David, Ofstad, Anne Pernille, Wanner, Christoph, Mattheus, Michaela, Zinman, Bernard, Lawler, Patrick R., Leiter, Lawrence A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37384110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100510
_version_ 1785063038149197824
author Verma, Subodh
Kosmopoulos, Andrew
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Fitchett, David
Ofstad, Anne Pernille
Wanner, Christoph
Mattheus, Michaela
Zinman, Bernard
Lawler, Patrick R.
Leiter, Lawrence A.
author_facet Verma, Subodh
Kosmopoulos, Andrew
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Fitchett, David
Ofstad, Anne Pernille
Wanner, Christoph
Mattheus, Michaela
Zinman, Bernard
Lawler, Patrick R.
Leiter, Lawrence A.
author_sort Verma, Subodh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: REDUCE-IT showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in participants with established CV disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) and at least one additional risk factor plus mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and reasonably controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). As the generalizability of REDUCE-IT has not been investigated in a T2D population with established CVD, this post hoc analysis investigated how many participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, which tested the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes in participants with T2D and CVD, would have been eligible for IPE treatment, and whether CV outcomes differed based on eligibility for IPE treatment. METHODS: Participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME were screened for inclusion using both REDUCE-IT-like criteria (baseline statin therapy, triglycerides 135–499 mg/dL and LDL-C 41–100 mg/dL) and slightly amended FDA indication criteria (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL). Analyses were conducted to characterize the study population and CV outcomes in participants eligible for IPE versus those not eligible for IPE. RESULTS: Of the 7020 participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 1810 (25.8%) fulfilled REDUCE-IT criteria and 3182 (45.3%) fulfilled FDA criteria for IPE treatment. Treatment effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV and kidney outcomes and mortality were consistent in participants meeting REDUCE-IT and FDA criteria and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a sizable proportion of patients with diabetes and established CVD, such as those in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, may be eligible for IPE treatment to lower residual CV risk. Treatment benefit with empagliflozin was consistent, regardless of REDUCE-IT or FDA eligibility criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10293663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102936632023-06-28 Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria Verma, Subodh Kosmopoulos, Andrew Bhatt, Deepak L. Fitchett, David Ofstad, Anne Pernille Wanner, Christoph Mattheus, Michaela Zinman, Bernard Lawler, Patrick R. Leiter, Lawrence A. Am J Prev Cardiol Original Research Contribution OBJECTIVES: REDUCE-IT showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in participants with established CV disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) and at least one additional risk factor plus mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and reasonably controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). As the generalizability of REDUCE-IT has not been investigated in a T2D population with established CVD, this post hoc analysis investigated how many participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, which tested the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes in participants with T2D and CVD, would have been eligible for IPE treatment, and whether CV outcomes differed based on eligibility for IPE treatment. METHODS: Participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME were screened for inclusion using both REDUCE-IT-like criteria (baseline statin therapy, triglycerides 135–499 mg/dL and LDL-C 41–100 mg/dL) and slightly amended FDA indication criteria (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL). Analyses were conducted to characterize the study population and CV outcomes in participants eligible for IPE versus those not eligible for IPE. RESULTS: Of the 7020 participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 1810 (25.8%) fulfilled REDUCE-IT criteria and 3182 (45.3%) fulfilled FDA criteria for IPE treatment. Treatment effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV and kidney outcomes and mortality were consistent in participants meeting REDUCE-IT and FDA criteria and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a sizable proportion of patients with diabetes and established CVD, such as those in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, may be eligible for IPE treatment to lower residual CV risk. Treatment benefit with empagliflozin was consistent, regardless of REDUCE-IT or FDA eligibility criteria. Elsevier 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10293663/ /pubmed/37384110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100510 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Contribution
Verma, Subodh
Kosmopoulos, Andrew
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Fitchett, David
Ofstad, Anne Pernille
Wanner, Christoph
Mattheus, Michaela
Zinman, Bernard
Lawler, Patrick R.
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title_full Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title_fullStr Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title_full_unstemmed Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title_short Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria
title_sort generalizability of reduce-it eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: a post hoc subgroup analysis of empa-reg outcome: analysis of empa-reg outcome using reduce-it criteria
topic Original Research Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37384110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100510
work_keys_str_mv AT vermasubodh generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT kosmopoulosandrew generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT bhattdeepakl generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT fitchettdavid generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT ofstadannepernille generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT wannerchristoph generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT mattheusmichaela generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT zinmanbernard generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT lawlerpatrickr generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria
AT leiterlawrencea generalizabilityofreduceiteligibilitycriteriainalargediabetescardiovascularoutcomestrialaposthocsubgroupanalysisofemparegoutcomeanalysisofemparegoutcomeusingreduceitcriteria