Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations

OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) and examine its validity and reliability. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among cancer patients in Japan. The PSQ-J was developed following the forward-backward translation method,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamo, Yuiko, Fujimori, Maiko, Asai, Mariko, Oishi, Takayuki, Mori, Masanori, Miyashita, Mitsunori, Morita, Tatsuya, Uchitomi, Yosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37384155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166
_version_ 1785063110913032192
author Kamo, Yuiko
Fujimori, Maiko
Asai, Mariko
Oishi, Takayuki
Mori, Masanori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Morita, Tatsuya
Uchitomi, Yosuke
author_facet Kamo, Yuiko
Fujimori, Maiko
Asai, Mariko
Oishi, Takayuki
Mori, Masanori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Morita, Tatsuya
Uchitomi, Yosuke
author_sort Kamo, Yuiko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) and examine its validity and reliability. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among cancer patients in Japan. The PSQ-J was developed following the forward-backward translation method, using a numerical rating scale. Data on patient characteristics and psychometric scales, like the PSQ-J, willingness to recommend an oncologist to others, trust in the healthcare system, uncertainty, and the Physician Compassion Questionnaire were collected. Validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and by calculating the correlations between the total PSQ-J score and the criterion variables. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest score correlations at a two-week interval. RESULTS: The first and second surveys were conducted on 309 and 107 patients, respectively. One-dimensionality and model fit were verified using factor analyses. The PSQ-J was significantly associated with other comparable scales. Cronbach's alpha was 0.962; the correlation between the PSQ-J test-retest scores was 0.835 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that the PSQ-J can be valid and reliable for assessing satisfaction with oncologist consultation. INNOVATION: The PSQ-J enables the effective assessment of patient satisfaction with oncologist consultations, leading to better practice reflecting the patient's viewpoint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10294039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102940392023-06-28 Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations Kamo, Yuiko Fujimori, Maiko Asai, Mariko Oishi, Takayuki Mori, Masanori Miyashita, Mitsunori Morita, Tatsuya Uchitomi, Yosuke PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) and examine its validity and reliability. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among cancer patients in Japan. The PSQ-J was developed following the forward-backward translation method, using a numerical rating scale. Data on patient characteristics and psychometric scales, like the PSQ-J, willingness to recommend an oncologist to others, trust in the healthcare system, uncertainty, and the Physician Compassion Questionnaire were collected. Validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and by calculating the correlations between the total PSQ-J score and the criterion variables. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest score correlations at a two-week interval. RESULTS: The first and second surveys were conducted on 309 and 107 patients, respectively. One-dimensionality and model fit were verified using factor analyses. The PSQ-J was significantly associated with other comparable scales. Cronbach's alpha was 0.962; the correlation between the PSQ-J test-retest scores was 0.835 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that the PSQ-J can be valid and reliable for assessing satisfaction with oncologist consultation. INNOVATION: The PSQ-J enables the effective assessment of patient satisfaction with oncologist consultations, leading to better practice reflecting the patient's viewpoint. Elsevier 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10294039/ /pubmed/37384155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full length article
Kamo, Yuiko
Fujimori, Maiko
Asai, Mariko
Oishi, Takayuki
Mori, Masanori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Morita, Tatsuya
Uchitomi, Yosuke
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title_full Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title_short Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations
title_sort validity and reliability of the japanese version of the patient satisfaction questionnaire (psq-j) for evaluating oncologist consultations
topic Full length article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37384155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166
work_keys_str_mv AT kamoyuiko validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT fujimorimaiko validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT asaimariko validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT oishitakayuki validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT morimasanori validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT miyashitamitsunori validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT moritatatsuya validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations
AT uchitomiyosuke validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepatientsatisfactionquestionnairepsqjforevaluatingoncologistconsultations