Cargando…

Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Dental implant is the principal treatment for edentulism and the healthiness of the peri-implant tissue has a pivotal role for its longterm success. In addition, it has been shown that also the topography of the healing abutment can influence the outcome of the restoration. The objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaggi, Giulia, Di Credico, Andrea, D’Addazio, Gianmaria, Ghinassi, Barbara, Argentieri, Giulio, Caputi, Sergio, Di Baldassarre, Angela, Sinjari, Bruna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y
_version_ 1785063179129192448
author Gaggi, Giulia
Di Credico, Andrea
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Ghinassi, Barbara
Argentieri, Giulio
Caputi, Sergio
Di Baldassarre, Angela
Sinjari, Bruna
author_facet Gaggi, Giulia
Di Credico, Andrea
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Ghinassi, Barbara
Argentieri, Giulio
Caputi, Sergio
Di Baldassarre, Angela
Sinjari, Bruna
author_sort Gaggi, Giulia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental implant is the principal treatment for edentulism and the healthiness of the peri-implant tissue has a pivotal role for its longterm success. In addition, it has been shown that also the topography of the healing abutment can influence the outcome of the restoration. The objective of this human clinical trial was to assess the impact of a novel laser-treated healing abutment on peri-implant connective tissue and extracellular matrix proteins compared to the conventional machined surface, which served as the control group. METHODS: During second surgical stage a customized healing abutment were inserted on 30 single dental implants. Healing abutments were realized with two alternated different surface (two side laser-treated surfaces and two side machined surfaces) in order to be considered both as test and control on the same implant and reduce positioning bias. Following the soft tissue healing period (30 ± 7 days) a 5 mm circular biopsy was retrieved. Immuno-histochemical and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses were performed on Collagen, Tenascin C, Fibrillin I, Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitor (TIMPs). 15 were processed for qPCR, while the other 15 were processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Paired t-test between the two groups were performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results revealed that the connective tissue facing the laser-treated surface expressed statistically significant lower amount of MMPs (p < 0.05) and higher level of TIMPs 3 (p < 0.05), compared to the tissue surrounding the machined implant, which, in turn expressed also altered level of extracellular matrix protein (Tenascin C, Fibrillin I (p < 0.05)) and Collagen V, that are known to be altered also in peri-implantitis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the laser-treated surface holds promise in positively influencing wound healing of peri-implant connective tissue. Results demonstrated that topographic nature of the healing abutments can positively influence mucosal wound healing and molecular expression. Previous studies have been demonstrated how laser treatment can rightly influence integrity and functionality of the gingiva epithelium and cell adhesion. Regarding connective tissue different molecular expression demonstrated a different inflammatory pattern between laser treated or machined surfaces where laser treated showed better response. Targeted interventions and preventive measures on peri- implant topography could effectively minimize the risk of peri-implant diseases contributing to the long-term success and durability of restoration. However, new studies are mandatory to better understand this phenomenon and the role of this surface in the peri-implantitis process.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT05754970). Registered 06/03/2023, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10294361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102943612023-06-28 Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials Gaggi, Giulia Di Credico, Andrea D’Addazio, Gianmaria Ghinassi, Barbara Argentieri, Giulio Caputi, Sergio Di Baldassarre, Angela Sinjari, Bruna BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Dental implant is the principal treatment for edentulism and the healthiness of the peri-implant tissue has a pivotal role for its longterm success. In addition, it has been shown that also the topography of the healing abutment can influence the outcome of the restoration. The objective of this human clinical trial was to assess the impact of a novel laser-treated healing abutment on peri-implant connective tissue and extracellular matrix proteins compared to the conventional machined surface, which served as the control group. METHODS: During second surgical stage a customized healing abutment were inserted on 30 single dental implants. Healing abutments were realized with two alternated different surface (two side laser-treated surfaces and two side machined surfaces) in order to be considered both as test and control on the same implant and reduce positioning bias. Following the soft tissue healing period (30 ± 7 days) a 5 mm circular biopsy was retrieved. Immuno-histochemical and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses were performed on Collagen, Tenascin C, Fibrillin I, Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitor (TIMPs). 15 were processed for qPCR, while the other 15 were processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Paired t-test between the two groups were performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results revealed that the connective tissue facing the laser-treated surface expressed statistically significant lower amount of MMPs (p < 0.05) and higher level of TIMPs 3 (p < 0.05), compared to the tissue surrounding the machined implant, which, in turn expressed also altered level of extracellular matrix protein (Tenascin C, Fibrillin I (p < 0.05)) and Collagen V, that are known to be altered also in peri-implantitis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the laser-treated surface holds promise in positively influencing wound healing of peri-implant connective tissue. Results demonstrated that topographic nature of the healing abutments can positively influence mucosal wound healing and molecular expression. Previous studies have been demonstrated how laser treatment can rightly influence integrity and functionality of the gingiva epithelium and cell adhesion. Regarding connective tissue different molecular expression demonstrated a different inflammatory pattern between laser treated or machined surfaces where laser treated showed better response. Targeted interventions and preventive measures on peri- implant topography could effectively minimize the risk of peri-implant diseases contributing to the long-term success and durability of restoration. However, new studies are mandatory to better understand this phenomenon and the role of this surface in the peri-implantitis process.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT05754970). Registered 06/03/2023, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10294361/ /pubmed/37370064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gaggi, Giulia
Di Credico, Andrea
D’Addazio, Gianmaria
Ghinassi, Barbara
Argentieri, Giulio
Caputi, Sergio
Di Baldassarre, Angela
Sinjari, Bruna
Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title_full Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title_fullStr Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title_short Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
title_sort impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gaggigiulia impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT dicredicoandrea impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT daddaziogianmaria impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT ghinassibarbara impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT argentierigiulio impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT caputisergio impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT dibaldassarreangela impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials
AT sinjaribruna impactonperiimplantconnectivetissueoflasertreatedversustraditionalhealingabutmentsahumanclinicaltrials