Cargando…
Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study
BACKGROUND: Pragmatic trials, because they study widely used treatments in settings of routine practice, require intensive participation from clinicians who determine whether patients can be enrolled. Clinicians are often conflicted between their therapeutic obligation to patients and their willingn...
Autores principales: | Clapp, Justin T., Dinh, Cassandra, Hsu, Monica, Neuman, Mark D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07445-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
por: Smyth, R M D, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Ethical Issues in the Design and Conduct of Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials in Hemodialysis Care: An Interview Study With Key Stakeholders
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Patients’ reasoning regarding the decision to participate in clinical cancer trials: an interview study
por: Dellson, Pia, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Feasibility of a pragmatic randomized adaptive clinical trial to evaluate a brief negotiational interview for harmful and hazardous alcohol use in Moshi, Tanzania
por: Staton, Catherine A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)