Cargando…
The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors
BACKGROUND: Odour-baited traps are useful for vector surveillance and control. However, most existing traps have shown inconsistent recapture rates across different mosquito species, necessitating the need for more effective and efficient traps. The MTego trap with integrated thermal stimuli has bee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05835-9 |
_version_ | 1785063204058038272 |
---|---|
author | Maasayi, Masudi Suleiman Machange, Jane Johnson Kamande, Dismas S. Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Moore, Sarah Jane Tambwe, Mgeni Mohamed |
author_facet | Maasayi, Masudi Suleiman Machange, Jane Johnson Kamande, Dismas S. Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Moore, Sarah Jane Tambwe, Mgeni Mohamed |
author_sort | Maasayi, Masudi Suleiman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Odour-baited traps are useful for vector surveillance and control. However, most existing traps have shown inconsistent recapture rates across different mosquito species, necessitating the need for more effective and efficient traps. The MTego trap with integrated thermal stimuli has been developed as an alternative trap. This study was undertaken to determine and compare the efficacy of the MTego trap to that of the Biogents (BG) modular BG-Pro (BGP) trap for sampling different mosquito species in a semi-field system. METHODS: Fully balanced Latin square design experiments (no-choice and dual choice) were conducted in semi-field chambers using laboratory-reared female Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles funestus, Anopheles arabiensis, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. There were 16 replicates, and 50 mosquitoes of each species were released in each chamber per replicate. The evaluated traps were as follows: the MTego trap baited with PM6 (MT-PM6), the MTego trap baited with BG-Lure (BGL) (MT-BGL), and the BGP trap baited with BG-Lure (BGP-BGL). RESULTS: In the no-choice test, the MT-BGL and BGP-BGL traps captured a similar proportion of An. gambiae (31% vs 29%, P-value = 0.519) and An. funestus (32% vs 33%, P = 0.520). The MT-PM6 and BGP-BGL traps showed no significant difference in capturing Ae. aegypti (33% vs 31%, P = 0.324). However, the BGP-BGL caught more An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes than the other traps (P < 0.0001). In the dual-choice test of MT-PM6 vs BGP-BGL, similar proportions of An. funestus (25% vs 27%, P = 0.473) and Ae. aegypti (29% vs 25%, P = 0.264) were captured in the traps, while the BGP-BGL captured more An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes than the MT-PM6 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the MTego trap has potential as a tool that can be used interchangeably with the BGP trap for sampling anthropophilic mosquitoes including African malaria vectors An. gambiae and An. funestus and the principal arbovirus vector Ae. aegypti. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10294468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102944682023-06-28 The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors Maasayi, Masudi Suleiman Machange, Jane Johnson Kamande, Dismas S. Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Moore, Sarah Jane Tambwe, Mgeni Mohamed Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Odour-baited traps are useful for vector surveillance and control. However, most existing traps have shown inconsistent recapture rates across different mosquito species, necessitating the need for more effective and efficient traps. The MTego trap with integrated thermal stimuli has been developed as an alternative trap. This study was undertaken to determine and compare the efficacy of the MTego trap to that of the Biogents (BG) modular BG-Pro (BGP) trap for sampling different mosquito species in a semi-field system. METHODS: Fully balanced Latin square design experiments (no-choice and dual choice) were conducted in semi-field chambers using laboratory-reared female Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles funestus, Anopheles arabiensis, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. There were 16 replicates, and 50 mosquitoes of each species were released in each chamber per replicate. The evaluated traps were as follows: the MTego trap baited with PM6 (MT-PM6), the MTego trap baited with BG-Lure (BGL) (MT-BGL), and the BGP trap baited with BG-Lure (BGP-BGL). RESULTS: In the no-choice test, the MT-BGL and BGP-BGL traps captured a similar proportion of An. gambiae (31% vs 29%, P-value = 0.519) and An. funestus (32% vs 33%, P = 0.520). The MT-PM6 and BGP-BGL traps showed no significant difference in capturing Ae. aegypti (33% vs 31%, P = 0.324). However, the BGP-BGL caught more An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes than the other traps (P < 0.0001). In the dual-choice test of MT-PM6 vs BGP-BGL, similar proportions of An. funestus (25% vs 27%, P = 0.473) and Ae. aegypti (29% vs 25%, P = 0.264) were captured in the traps, while the BGP-BGL captured more An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes than the MT-PM6 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the MTego trap has potential as a tool that can be used interchangeably with the BGP trap for sampling anthropophilic mosquitoes including African malaria vectors An. gambiae and An. funestus and the principal arbovirus vector Ae. aegypti. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10294468/ /pubmed/37370169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05835-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Maasayi, Masudi Suleiman Machange, Jane Johnson Kamande, Dismas S. Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Moore, Sarah Jane Tambwe, Mgeni Mohamed The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title | The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title_full | The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title_fullStr | The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title_full_unstemmed | The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title_short | The MTego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
title_sort | mtego trap: a potential tool for monitoring malaria and arbovirus vectors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05835-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maasayimasudisuleiman themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT machangejanejohnson themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT kamandedismass themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT kibondoummiabdul themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT odufuwaolukayodeg themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT mooresarahjane themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT tambwemgenimohamed themtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT maasayimasudisuleiman mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT machangejanejohnson mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT kamandedismass mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT kibondoummiabdul mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT odufuwaolukayodeg mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT mooresarahjane mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors AT tambwemgenimohamed mtegotrapapotentialtoolformonitoringmalariaandarbovirusvectors |