Cargando…

Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy

Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Given the recent approval of the first therapy for GA, pegcetacoplan, we critically appraise methodological aspects of the phase 3 clinical trials published so far in this disease in relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biarnés, Marc, Garrell-Salat, Xavier, Gómez-Benlloch, Alba, Guarro, Mercè, Londoño, Gabriel, López, Elena, Ruiz, Sergi, Vázquez, Meritxell, Sararols, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061548
_version_ 1785063273324871680
author Biarnés, Marc
Garrell-Salat, Xavier
Gómez-Benlloch, Alba
Guarro, Mercè
Londoño, Gabriel
López, Elena
Ruiz, Sergi
Vázquez, Meritxell
Sararols, Laura
author_facet Biarnés, Marc
Garrell-Salat, Xavier
Gómez-Benlloch, Alba
Guarro, Mercè
Londoño, Gabriel
López, Elena
Ruiz, Sergi
Vázquez, Meritxell
Sararols, Laura
author_sort Biarnés, Marc
collection PubMed
description Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Given the recent approval of the first therapy for GA, pegcetacoplan, we critically appraise methodological aspects of the phase 3 clinical trials published so far in this disease in relation to their design, analysis and interpretation. We reviewed some of the key attributes of all phase 3 clinical trials in GA available in the main public registry of clinical trials as of 20 May 2023. The topics discussed included types of endpoints, eligibility criteria, p-value and effect size, study power and sample size, the intention to treat principle, missing data, consistency of results, efficacy–safety balance and application of results. Five phase 3 clinical trials have reported results, either partially or completely: GATHER1, DERBY/OAKS, CHROMA/SPECTRI, SEATTLE and GATE. Although there are many similarities between these trials in terms of endpoints or broad eligibility criteria, they differ in several aspects (metric of the primary endpoint, sample size, type of adverse events, etc.) that can influence the results, which are discussed. Readers should understand key methodological aspects of clinical trials to improve their interpretation. On the other hand, authors should adhere to clinical trial reporting guidelines to communicate what was done and how it was done.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10294818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102948182023-06-28 Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy Biarnés, Marc Garrell-Salat, Xavier Gómez-Benlloch, Alba Guarro, Mercè Londoño, Gabriel López, Elena Ruiz, Sergi Vázquez, Meritxell Sararols, Laura Biomedicines Tutorial Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Given the recent approval of the first therapy for GA, pegcetacoplan, we critically appraise methodological aspects of the phase 3 clinical trials published so far in this disease in relation to their design, analysis and interpretation. We reviewed some of the key attributes of all phase 3 clinical trials in GA available in the main public registry of clinical trials as of 20 May 2023. The topics discussed included types of endpoints, eligibility criteria, p-value and effect size, study power and sample size, the intention to treat principle, missing data, consistency of results, efficacy–safety balance and application of results. Five phase 3 clinical trials have reported results, either partially or completely: GATHER1, DERBY/OAKS, CHROMA/SPECTRI, SEATTLE and GATE. Although there are many similarities between these trials in terms of endpoints or broad eligibility criteria, they differ in several aspects (metric of the primary endpoint, sample size, type of adverse events, etc.) that can influence the results, which are discussed. Readers should understand key methodological aspects of clinical trials to improve their interpretation. On the other hand, authors should adhere to clinical trial reporting guidelines to communicate what was done and how it was done. MDPI 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10294818/ /pubmed/37371644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061548 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Tutorial
Biarnés, Marc
Garrell-Salat, Xavier
Gómez-Benlloch, Alba
Guarro, Mercè
Londoño, Gabriel
López, Elena
Ruiz, Sergi
Vázquez, Meritxell
Sararols, Laura
Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title_full Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title_fullStr Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title_short Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy
title_sort methodological appraisal of phase 3 clinical trials in geographic atrophy
topic Tutorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061548
work_keys_str_mv AT biarnesmarc methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT garrellsalatxavier methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT gomezbenllochalba methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT guarromerce methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT londonogabriel methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT lopezelena methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT ruizsergi methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT vazquezmeritxell methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy
AT sararolslaura methodologicalappraisalofphase3clinicaltrialsingeographicatrophy