Cargando…
Outcomes of Intravenous Push versus Intermittent Infusion Administration of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients
The equivalence of intravenous push (IVP) and piggyback (IVPB) administration has not been evaluated in the critically ill population for most medications, but it is especially relevant for antibiotics, such as cefepime, that exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity. A single center, retrospecti...
Autores principales: | Smith, Susan E., Halbig, Zachary, Fox, Nicholas R., Bland, Christopher M., Branan, Trisha N. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060996 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion versus intermittent regimen
por: Georges, B, et al.
Publicado: (2001) -
2562. Retrospective Analysis of Cefepime Intravenous Push versus Extended Infusion for the Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
por: Rust, Thomas J, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cefepime extended infusion versus intermittent infusion: Clinical and cost evaluation
por: Khole, Aalok V., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
1306. Comparison of the Use of Extended and Intermittent Infusion Cefepime and Piperacillin/tazobactam in Non-critically Ill, Obese Patients
por: Marg, Carolyn, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Continuous Vancomycin Infusion versus Intermittent Infusion in Critically Ill Patients
por: Maluangnon, Chailat, et al.
Publicado: (2022)