Cargando…
Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection
Background: The use of a cochlear implant (CI) for hearing rehabilitation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection is widely spreading. The procedure is usually performed simultaneously to tumor resection with a translabyrinthine approach. To ensure the best device function, assessing the integrit...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13030035 |
_version_ | 1785063454233591808 |
---|---|
author | Di Pasquale Fiasca, Valerio Maria Tealdo, Giulia |
author_facet | Di Pasquale Fiasca, Valerio Maria Tealdo, Giulia |
author_sort | Di Pasquale Fiasca, Valerio Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The use of a cochlear implant (CI) for hearing rehabilitation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection is widely spreading. The procedure is usually performed simultaneously to tumor resection with a translabyrinthine approach. To ensure the best device function, assessing the integrity of the cochlear nerve is of primary importance. Methods: A narrative review of the literature on the present topic was carried out up to June 2022. Finally, nine studies were considered. Results: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) is the most widely used method of intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve (CN) during VS resection, although its limits are known. It can be assessed through the CI electrode array or through an intracochlear test electrode (ITE). Variations of the graph are evaluated during the surgical procedure, in particular the wave V amplitude and latency. As tumor dissection progresses, the parameters may change, informing of the CN status, and the surgical procedure may be modulated. Conclusion: An eABR positive result seems to be reliably correlated with a good CI outcome in those cases in which a clear wave V is recorded before and after tumor removal. On the contrary, in those cases in which the eABR is lost or altered during the surgical procedure, the positioning of a CI is still debatable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10295576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102955762023-06-28 Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection Di Pasquale Fiasca, Valerio Maria Tealdo, Giulia Audiol Res Review Background: The use of a cochlear implant (CI) for hearing rehabilitation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection is widely spreading. The procedure is usually performed simultaneously to tumor resection with a translabyrinthine approach. To ensure the best device function, assessing the integrity of the cochlear nerve is of primary importance. Methods: A narrative review of the literature on the present topic was carried out up to June 2022. Finally, nine studies were considered. Results: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) is the most widely used method of intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve (CN) during VS resection, although its limits are known. It can be assessed through the CI electrode array or through an intracochlear test electrode (ITE). Variations of the graph are evaluated during the surgical procedure, in particular the wave V amplitude and latency. As tumor dissection progresses, the parameters may change, informing of the CN status, and the surgical procedure may be modulated. Conclusion: An eABR positive result seems to be reliably correlated with a good CI outcome in those cases in which a clear wave V is recorded before and after tumor removal. On the contrary, in those cases in which the eABR is lost or altered during the surgical procedure, the positioning of a CI is still debatable. MDPI 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10295576/ /pubmed/37366681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13030035 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Di Pasquale Fiasca, Valerio Maria Tealdo, Giulia Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title | Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title_full | Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title_short | Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection |
title_sort | intraoperative cochlear nerve monitoring in cochlear implantation after vestibular schwannoma resection |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13030035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dipasqualefiascavaleriomaria intraoperativecochlearnervemonitoringincochlearimplantationaftervestibularschwannomaresection AT tealdogiulia intraoperativecochlearnervemonitoringincochlearimplantationaftervestibularschwannomaresection |