Cargando…

Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The most harmful storage pest of pulses is known to be the bruchid or pulse beetle, especially in the tropics and subtropics. Chemical insecticides work well to reduce bruchid infestation; however, they have negative effects on the health of food consumers. One of the best mitigating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahu, Prince, Singh, Mahendra, Pandey, Rakesh, Mishra, Mukesh Kumar, Singh, Akhilesh Kumar, Singh, Bhupendra Kumar, Singh, Surendra Kumar, Rai, Ashutosh, Chugh, Vishal, Shukla, Gaurav, Singh, Saurabh, Singh, Kartikey, Kumar, Mukul, Singh, Chandra Mohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12060781
_version_ 1785063488313360384
author Sahu, Prince
Singh, Mahendra
Pandey, Rakesh
Mishra, Mukesh Kumar
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Singh, Bhupendra Kumar
Singh, Surendra Kumar
Rai, Ashutosh
Chugh, Vishal
Shukla, Gaurav
Singh, Saurabh
Singh, Kartikey
Kumar, Mukul
Singh, Chandra Mohan
author_facet Sahu, Prince
Singh, Mahendra
Pandey, Rakesh
Mishra, Mukesh Kumar
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Singh, Bhupendra Kumar
Singh, Surendra Kumar
Rai, Ashutosh
Chugh, Vishal
Shukla, Gaurav
Singh, Saurabh
Singh, Kartikey
Kumar, Mukul
Singh, Chandra Mohan
author_sort Sahu, Prince
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The most harmful storage pest of pulses is known to be the bruchid or pulse beetle, especially in the tropics and subtropics. Chemical insecticides work well to reduce bruchid infestation; however, they have negative effects on the health of food consumers. One of the best mitigating methods among efficient, safe and sustainable strategies to lessen crop losses during storage is the development of pulse-beetle-resistant cultivars. Unfortunately, the majority of pulses lack resistance to the pulse beetle. Consequently, it is necessary to look for pulse beetle resistance in wild and exotic germplasms. Identifying potential donors for pulse beetle resistance and examining their characters in bruchid-susceptible and -resistant genotypes were the goals of the present investigation. Among the tested genotypes, two genotypes, i.e., PRR 2008-2 and PRR 2008-2-sel, were found to be highly resistant, and one accession, TCR-93, was found to be resistant to the pulse beetle. The biochemical basis of resistance modulated by the basal expression of antioxidants in highly resistant genotypes has also been studied. Currently, a quicker option for generating substantial genetic gain for desired trait improvement is molecular breeding. In the present investigation, start codon targets (SCoT) markers were used to analyse the genetic differences. ABSTRACT: Pulses are a key source of dietary proteins in human nutrition. Despite several efforts to increase the production, various constraints, such as biotic and abiotic factors, threaten pulse production by various means. Bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.) are the serious issue of concern, particularly in storage conditions. Understanding host–plant resistance at morphological, biochemical and molecular levels is the best way to minimize yield losses. The 117 mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes, including endemic wild relatives, were screened for resistance against Callosobruchus chinensis; among them, two genotypes, PRR 2008-2 and PRR 2008-2-sel, which belong to V. umbellata (Thumb.), were identified as highly resistant. The expression of antioxidants in susceptible and resistant genotypes revealed that the activity of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) was upregulated in the highly resistant wild Vigna species and lower in the cultivated susceptible genotypes, along with other biomarkers. Further, the SCoT-based genotyping revealed SCoT-30 (200 bp), SCoT-31 (1200 bp) and SCoT-32 (300 bp) as unique amplicons, which might be useful for developing the novel ricebean-based SCAR markers to accelerate the molecular breeding programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10295720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102957202023-06-28 Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. Sahu, Prince Singh, Mahendra Pandey, Rakesh Mishra, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Bhupendra Kumar Singh, Surendra Kumar Rai, Ashutosh Chugh, Vishal Shukla, Gaurav Singh, Saurabh Singh, Kartikey Kumar, Mukul Singh, Chandra Mohan Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The most harmful storage pest of pulses is known to be the bruchid or pulse beetle, especially in the tropics and subtropics. Chemical insecticides work well to reduce bruchid infestation; however, they have negative effects on the health of food consumers. One of the best mitigating methods among efficient, safe and sustainable strategies to lessen crop losses during storage is the development of pulse-beetle-resistant cultivars. Unfortunately, the majority of pulses lack resistance to the pulse beetle. Consequently, it is necessary to look for pulse beetle resistance in wild and exotic germplasms. Identifying potential donors for pulse beetle resistance and examining their characters in bruchid-susceptible and -resistant genotypes were the goals of the present investigation. Among the tested genotypes, two genotypes, i.e., PRR 2008-2 and PRR 2008-2-sel, were found to be highly resistant, and one accession, TCR-93, was found to be resistant to the pulse beetle. The biochemical basis of resistance modulated by the basal expression of antioxidants in highly resistant genotypes has also been studied. Currently, a quicker option for generating substantial genetic gain for desired trait improvement is molecular breeding. In the present investigation, start codon targets (SCoT) markers were used to analyse the genetic differences. ABSTRACT: Pulses are a key source of dietary proteins in human nutrition. Despite several efforts to increase the production, various constraints, such as biotic and abiotic factors, threaten pulse production by various means. Bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.) are the serious issue of concern, particularly in storage conditions. Understanding host–plant resistance at morphological, biochemical and molecular levels is the best way to minimize yield losses. The 117 mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes, including endemic wild relatives, were screened for resistance against Callosobruchus chinensis; among them, two genotypes, PRR 2008-2 and PRR 2008-2-sel, which belong to V. umbellata (Thumb.), were identified as highly resistant. The expression of antioxidants in susceptible and resistant genotypes revealed that the activity of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) was upregulated in the highly resistant wild Vigna species and lower in the cultivated susceptible genotypes, along with other biomarkers. Further, the SCoT-based genotyping revealed SCoT-30 (200 bp), SCoT-31 (1200 bp) and SCoT-32 (300 bp) as unique amplicons, which might be useful for developing the novel ricebean-based SCAR markers to accelerate the molecular breeding programme. MDPI 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10295720/ /pubmed/37372066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12060781 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sahu, Prince
Singh, Mahendra
Pandey, Rakesh
Mishra, Mukesh Kumar
Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
Singh, Bhupendra Kumar
Singh, Surendra Kumar
Rai, Ashutosh
Chugh, Vishal
Shukla, Gaurav
Singh, Saurabh
Singh, Kartikey
Kumar, Mukul
Singh, Chandra Mohan
Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title_full Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title_fullStr Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title_full_unstemmed Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title_short Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
title_sort screening of comprehensive panel of cultivated and wild vigna species for resistance to pulse beetle, callosobruchus chinensis l.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12060781
work_keys_str_mv AT sahuprince screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhmahendra screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT pandeyrakesh screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT mishramukeshkumar screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhakhileshkumar screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhbhupendrakumar screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhsurendrakumar screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT raiashutosh screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT chughvishal screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT shuklagaurav screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhsaurabh screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhkartikey screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT kumarmukul screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl
AT singhchandramohan screeningofcomprehensivepanelofcultivatedandwildvignaspeciesforresistancetopulsebeetlecallosobruchuschinensisl