Cargando…
Efficacy of Electrochemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients of Different Receptor Status: The INSPECT Experience
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Electrochemotherapy has proven to be an efficient treatment for cutaneous metastases of various cancers including breast cancer (BC). The large number of patients collected within the INSPECT database provides the possibility of a differentiated analysis on BC with different receptor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123116 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Electrochemotherapy has proven to be an efficient treatment for cutaneous metastases of various cancers including breast cancer (BC). The large number of patients collected within the INSPECT database provides the possibility of a differentiated analysis on BC with different receptor statuses (estrogen receptor and HER2 receptor). Patients with BC presenting cutaneous metastases were retrieved from the INSPECT database and divided by their receptor status: HER2+, HR+ (ER/PgR+), and TN (triple negative). ECT treatment is equally effective among groups, despite different conditions, age, time since diagnosis, previous or concomitant treatments, and treatment characteristics. Response and local tumor control seem to be better in multiple small lesions than in big armor-like lesions, suggesting that treating smaller, even multiple, lesions at the time of occurrence is more effective than treating bigger long-lasting armor-like cutaneous lesions. ABSTRACT: Electrochemotherapy has been proven to be an efficient treatment for cutaneous metastases of various cancers. Data on breast cancer (BC) patients with cutaneous metastases were retrieved from the INSPECT database. Patients were divided by their receptor status: HER2+, HR+ (ER/PgR+), and TN (triple negative). Groups were similar for histological subtype and location of the nodules. Most patients were previously treated with surgery/systemic therapy/radiotherapy. We found no differences in the three groups in terms of response ratio (OR per patient 86% HER2+, 80% HR+, 76% TN, p = 0.8664). The only factor positively affecting the complete response rate in all groups was small tumor size (<3 cm, p = 0.0105, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0266, respectively). Local progression-free survival was positively impacted by the achievement of complete response in HER2+ (p = 0.0297) and HR+ (p = 0.0094), while overall survival was affected by time to local progression in all groups (p = 0.0065 in HER2+, p < 0.0001 in HR+, p = 0.0363 in TN). ECT treatment is equally effective among groups, despite different receptor status. Response and local tumor control seem to be better in multiple small lesions than in big armor-like lesions, suggesting that treating smaller, even multiple, lesions at the time of occurrence is more effective than treating bigger long-lasting armor-like cutaneous lesions. |
---|