Cargando…
Cetuximab for Immunotherapy-Refractory/Ineligible Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cetuximab remains a viable treatment for patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who fail or are ineligible for immunotherapy. When used immediately following the progression of anti-PD1 therapy, cetuximab demonstrated particularly rapid and durable responses in our...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10295991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123180 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cetuximab remains a viable treatment for patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who fail or are ineligible for immunotherapy. When used immediately following the progression of anti-PD1 therapy, cetuximab demonstrated particularly rapid and durable responses in our single institution retrospective experience. These findings should be validated in larger, prospective studies. However, if results are confirmed, cetuximab should be considered the preferred second-line agent after the failure of ICI. Future research should explore how ICI impacts subsequent anti-EGFR therapy, determine the ideal sequencing strategy when these agents are used and define if combination therapy using ICI with cetuximab is better than using either agent alone. ABSTRACT: Anti-PD1 therapy demonstrated impressive, prolonged responses in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Therapy for ICI-refractory/ineligible disease remains unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis in locally-advanced/metastatic CSCC using cetuximab across three cohorts: immediately after ICI failure (A), not immediately following ICI failure (B), or without prior ICI (C). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease-control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time-to-response (TTR) and toxicity. Twenty-three patients were included. In cohort A (n = 11), the ORR was 64% and DCR was 91%, with six ongoing responses at data cutoff. In cohort B (n = 2), all patients had progression as the best response. At a median follow-up of 21 months for A and B, TTR and PFS were 2.0 and 17.3 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached. In cohort C (n = 10), the ORR and DCR were 80%, including five ongoing responses at the data cutoff. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the TTR, PFS and OS were 2.5, 7.3 and 23.1 months, respectively. Cetuximab was well tolerated in all cohorts. In summary, cetuximab is effective in patients with failure/contraindications to ICI. Cetuximab immediately after ICI failure yielded particularly fast, durable responses. If confirmed, this could be the preferred therapy following ICI failure. |
---|