Cargando…
Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842 |
_version_ | 1785063672138170368 |
---|---|
author | Figueredo, Luisa F. Martínez, Andrea L. Suarez-Meade, Paola Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina Salazar, Andrés Felipe Pabon, Daniela Guzmán, Juan Murguiondo-Perez, Renata Hallak, Hana Godo, Alex Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G. Donaldson, Angela Chaichana, Kaisorn L. Peris-Celda, María Bendok, Bernard R. Samson, Susan L. Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Almeida, Joao Paulo |
author_facet | Figueredo, Luisa F. Martínez, Andrea L. Suarez-Meade, Paola Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina Salazar, Andrés Felipe Pabon, Daniela Guzmán, Juan Murguiondo-Perez, Renata Hallak, Hana Godo, Alex Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G. Donaldson, Angela Chaichana, Kaisorn L. Peris-Celda, María Bendok, Bernard R. Samson, Susan L. Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Almeida, Joao Paulo |
author_sort | Figueredo, Luisa F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X(2) and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm(3), -TCA 13.23 cm(3)). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10296530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102965302023-06-28 Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach Figueredo, Luisa F. Martínez, Andrea L. Suarez-Meade, Paola Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina Salazar, Andrés Felipe Pabon, Daniela Guzmán, Juan Murguiondo-Perez, Renata Hallak, Hana Godo, Alex Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G. Donaldson, Angela Chaichana, Kaisorn L. Peris-Celda, María Bendok, Bernard R. Samson, Susan L. Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Almeida, Joao Paulo Brain Sci Systematic Review In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X(2) and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm(3), -TCA 13.23 cm(3)). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery. MDPI 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10296530/ /pubmed/37371322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Figueredo, Luisa F. Martínez, Andrea L. Suarez-Meade, Paola Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina Salazar, Andrés Felipe Pabon, Daniela Guzmán, Juan Murguiondo-Perez, Renata Hallak, Hana Godo, Alex Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G. Donaldson, Angela Chaichana, Kaisorn L. Peris-Celda, María Bendok, Bernard R. Samson, Susan L. Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Almeida, Joao Paulo Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title | Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title_full | Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title_fullStr | Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title_short | Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach |
title_sort | current role of endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis comparison with the open transcranial approach |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT figueredoluisaf currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT martinezandreal currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT suarezmeadepaola currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT marencohillembrandlina currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT salazarandresfelipe currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT pabondaniela currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT guzmanjuan currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT murguiondoperezrenata currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT hallakhana currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT godoalex currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT sandovalgarciacarolina currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT ordonezrubianoedgarg currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT donaldsonangela currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT chaichanakaisornl currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT perisceldamaria currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT bendokbernardr currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT samsonsusanl currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT quinoneshinojosaalfredo currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach AT almeidajoaopaulo currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach |