Cargando…

Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach

In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueredo, Luisa F., Martínez, Andrea L., Suarez-Meade, Paola, Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina, Salazar, Andrés Felipe, Pabon, Daniela, Guzmán, Juan, Murguiondo-Perez, Renata, Hallak, Hana, Godo, Alex, Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina, Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G., Donaldson, Angela, Chaichana, Kaisorn L., Peris-Celda, María, Bendok, Bernard R., Samson, Susan L., Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo, Almeida, Joao Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842
_version_ 1785063672138170368
author Figueredo, Luisa F.
Martínez, Andrea L.
Suarez-Meade, Paola
Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina
Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Pabon, Daniela
Guzmán, Juan
Murguiondo-Perez, Renata
Hallak, Hana
Godo, Alex
Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina
Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G.
Donaldson, Angela
Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
Peris-Celda, María
Bendok, Bernard R.
Samson, Susan L.
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
Almeida, Joao Paulo
author_facet Figueredo, Luisa F.
Martínez, Andrea L.
Suarez-Meade, Paola
Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina
Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Pabon, Daniela
Guzmán, Juan
Murguiondo-Perez, Renata
Hallak, Hana
Godo, Alex
Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina
Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G.
Donaldson, Angela
Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
Peris-Celda, María
Bendok, Bernard R.
Samson, Susan L.
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
Almeida, Joao Paulo
author_sort Figueredo, Luisa F.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X(2) and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm(3), -TCA 13.23 cm(3)). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10296530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102965302023-06-28 Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach Figueredo, Luisa F. Martínez, Andrea L. Suarez-Meade, Paola Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina Salazar, Andrés Felipe Pabon, Daniela Guzmán, Juan Murguiondo-Perez, Renata Hallak, Hana Godo, Alex Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G. Donaldson, Angela Chaichana, Kaisorn L. Peris-Celda, María Bendok, Bernard R. Samson, Susan L. Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo Almeida, Joao Paulo Brain Sci Systematic Review In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X(2) and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm(3), -TCA 13.23 cm(3)). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery. MDPI 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10296530/ /pubmed/37371322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Figueredo, Luisa F.
Martínez, Andrea L.
Suarez-Meade, Paola
Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina
Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Pabon, Daniela
Guzmán, Juan
Murguiondo-Perez, Renata
Hallak, Hana
Godo, Alex
Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina
Ordoñez-Rubiano, Edgar G.
Donaldson, Angela
Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
Peris-Celda, María
Bendok, Bernard R.
Samson, Susan L.
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
Almeida, Joao Paulo
Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title_full Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title_fullStr Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title_full_unstemmed Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title_short Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach
title_sort current role of endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis comparison with the open transcranial approach
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060842
work_keys_str_mv AT figueredoluisaf currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT martinezandreal currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT suarezmeadepaola currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT marencohillembrandlina currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT salazarandresfelipe currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT pabondaniela currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT guzmanjuan currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT murguiondoperezrenata currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT hallakhana currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT godoalex currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT sandovalgarciacarolina currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT ordonezrubianoedgarg currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT donaldsonangela currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT chaichanakaisornl currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT perisceldamaria currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT bendokbernardr currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT samsonsusanl currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT quinoneshinojosaalfredo currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach
AT almeidajoaopaulo currentroleofendoscopicendonasalapproachforcraniopharyngiomasa10yearsystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparisonwiththeopentranscranialapproach