Cargando…

Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goller, Sophia S., Rischewski, Jon F., Liebig, Thomas, Ricke, Jens, Siller, Sebastian, Schmidt, Vanessa F., Stahl, Robert, Kulozik, Julian, Baum, Thomas, Kirschke, Jan S., Foreman, Sarah C., Gersing, Alexandra S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119
_version_ 1785063733861548032
author Goller, Sophia S.
Rischewski, Jon F.
Liebig, Thomas
Ricke, Jens
Siller, Sebastian
Schmidt, Vanessa F.
Stahl, Robert
Kulozik, Julian
Baum, Thomas
Kirschke, Jan S.
Foreman, Sarah C.
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_facet Goller, Sophia S.
Rischewski, Jon F.
Liebig, Thomas
Ricke, Jens
Siller, Sebastian
Schmidt, Vanessa F.
Stahl, Robert
Kulozik, Julian
Baum, Thomas
Kirschke, Jan S.
Foreman, Sarah C.
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_sort Goller, Sophia S.
collection PubMed
description Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, the performance compared to the established manual opportunistic vBMD measures remains unclear. Hence, we investigated patients with a routine MDCT of the spine who had developed a new osteoporotic incidental VF and frequency matched to patients without incidental VFs as assessed on follow-up MDCT images after 1.5 years. Automated vBMD was generated using CNN-generated segmentation masks and asynchronous calibration. Additionally, manual vBMD was sampled by two radiologists. Automated vBMD measurements in patients with incidental VFs at 1.5-years follow-up (n = 53) were significantly lower compared to patients without incidental VFs (n = 104) (83.6 ± 29.4 mg/cm(3) vs. 102.1 ± 27.7 mg/cm(3), p < 0.001). This comparison was not significant for manually assessed vBMD (99.2 ± 37.6 mg/cm(3) vs. 107.9 ± 33.9 mg/cm(3), p = 0.30). When adjusting for age and sex, both automated and manual vBMD measurements were significantly associated with incidental VFs at 1.5-year follow-up, however, the associations were stronger for automated measurements (β = −0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): −20.10, 4.35; p < 0.001) compared to manual measurements (β = −0.15; 95% CI: −11.16, 5.16; p < 0.03). In conclusion, automated opportunistic measurements are feasible and can be useful for bone mineral density assessment in clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10296803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102968032023-06-28 Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT Goller, Sophia S. Rischewski, Jon F. Liebig, Thomas Ricke, Jens Siller, Sebastian Schmidt, Vanessa F. Stahl, Robert Kulozik, Julian Baum, Thomas Kirschke, Jan S. Foreman, Sarah C. Gersing, Alexandra S. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, the performance compared to the established manual opportunistic vBMD measures remains unclear. Hence, we investigated patients with a routine MDCT of the spine who had developed a new osteoporotic incidental VF and frequency matched to patients without incidental VFs as assessed on follow-up MDCT images after 1.5 years. Automated vBMD was generated using CNN-generated segmentation masks and asynchronous calibration. Additionally, manual vBMD was sampled by two radiologists. Automated vBMD measurements in patients with incidental VFs at 1.5-years follow-up (n = 53) were significantly lower compared to patients without incidental VFs (n = 104) (83.6 ± 29.4 mg/cm(3) vs. 102.1 ± 27.7 mg/cm(3), p < 0.001). This comparison was not significant for manually assessed vBMD (99.2 ± 37.6 mg/cm(3) vs. 107.9 ± 33.9 mg/cm(3), p = 0.30). When adjusting for age and sex, both automated and manual vBMD measurements were significantly associated with incidental VFs at 1.5-year follow-up, however, the associations were stronger for automated measurements (β = −0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): −20.10, 4.35; p < 0.001) compared to manual measurements (β = −0.15; 95% CI: −11.16, 5.16; p < 0.03). In conclusion, automated opportunistic measurements are feasible and can be useful for bone mineral density assessment in clinical routine. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10296803/ /pubmed/37371014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goller, Sophia S.
Rischewski, Jon F.
Liebig, Thomas
Ricke, Jens
Siller, Sebastian
Schmidt, Vanessa F.
Stahl, Robert
Kulozik, Julian
Baum, Thomas
Kirschke, Jan S.
Foreman, Sarah C.
Gersing, Alexandra S.
Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title_full Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title_fullStr Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title_full_unstemmed Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title_short Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
title_sort automated opportunistic trabecular volumetric bone mineral density extraction outperforms manual measurements for the prediction of vertebral fractures in routine ct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119
work_keys_str_mv AT gollersophias automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT rischewskijonf automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT liebigthomas automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT rickejens automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT sillersebastian automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT schmidtvanessaf automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT stahlrobert automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT kulozikjulian automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT baumthomas automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT kirschkejans automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT foremansarahc automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect
AT gersingalexandras automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect