Cargando…
Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119 |
_version_ | 1785063733861548032 |
---|---|
author | Goller, Sophia S. Rischewski, Jon F. Liebig, Thomas Ricke, Jens Siller, Sebastian Schmidt, Vanessa F. Stahl, Robert Kulozik, Julian Baum, Thomas Kirschke, Jan S. Foreman, Sarah C. Gersing, Alexandra S. |
author_facet | Goller, Sophia S. Rischewski, Jon F. Liebig, Thomas Ricke, Jens Siller, Sebastian Schmidt, Vanessa F. Stahl, Robert Kulozik, Julian Baum, Thomas Kirschke, Jan S. Foreman, Sarah C. Gersing, Alexandra S. |
author_sort | Goller, Sophia S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, the performance compared to the established manual opportunistic vBMD measures remains unclear. Hence, we investigated patients with a routine MDCT of the spine who had developed a new osteoporotic incidental VF and frequency matched to patients without incidental VFs as assessed on follow-up MDCT images after 1.5 years. Automated vBMD was generated using CNN-generated segmentation masks and asynchronous calibration. Additionally, manual vBMD was sampled by two radiologists. Automated vBMD measurements in patients with incidental VFs at 1.5-years follow-up (n = 53) were significantly lower compared to patients without incidental VFs (n = 104) (83.6 ± 29.4 mg/cm(3) vs. 102.1 ± 27.7 mg/cm(3), p < 0.001). This comparison was not significant for manually assessed vBMD (99.2 ± 37.6 mg/cm(3) vs. 107.9 ± 33.9 mg/cm(3), p = 0.30). When adjusting for age and sex, both automated and manual vBMD measurements were significantly associated with incidental VFs at 1.5-year follow-up, however, the associations were stronger for automated measurements (β = −0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): −20.10, 4.35; p < 0.001) compared to manual measurements (β = −0.15; 95% CI: −11.16, 5.16; p < 0.03). In conclusion, automated opportunistic measurements are feasible and can be useful for bone mineral density assessment in clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10296803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102968032023-06-28 Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT Goller, Sophia S. Rischewski, Jon F. Liebig, Thomas Ricke, Jens Siller, Sebastian Schmidt, Vanessa F. Stahl, Robert Kulozik, Julian Baum, Thomas Kirschke, Jan S. Foreman, Sarah C. Gersing, Alexandra S. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, the performance compared to the established manual opportunistic vBMD measures remains unclear. Hence, we investigated patients with a routine MDCT of the spine who had developed a new osteoporotic incidental VF and frequency matched to patients without incidental VFs as assessed on follow-up MDCT images after 1.5 years. Automated vBMD was generated using CNN-generated segmentation masks and asynchronous calibration. Additionally, manual vBMD was sampled by two radiologists. Automated vBMD measurements in patients with incidental VFs at 1.5-years follow-up (n = 53) were significantly lower compared to patients without incidental VFs (n = 104) (83.6 ± 29.4 mg/cm(3) vs. 102.1 ± 27.7 mg/cm(3), p < 0.001). This comparison was not significant for manually assessed vBMD (99.2 ± 37.6 mg/cm(3) vs. 107.9 ± 33.9 mg/cm(3), p = 0.30). When adjusting for age and sex, both automated and manual vBMD measurements were significantly associated with incidental VFs at 1.5-year follow-up, however, the associations were stronger for automated measurements (β = −0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): −20.10, 4.35; p < 0.001) compared to manual measurements (β = −0.15; 95% CI: −11.16, 5.16; p < 0.03). In conclusion, automated opportunistic measurements are feasible and can be useful for bone mineral density assessment in clinical routine. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10296803/ /pubmed/37371014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Goller, Sophia S. Rischewski, Jon F. Liebig, Thomas Ricke, Jens Siller, Sebastian Schmidt, Vanessa F. Stahl, Robert Kulozik, Julian Baum, Thomas Kirschke, Jan S. Foreman, Sarah C. Gersing, Alexandra S. Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title | Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title_full | Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title_fullStr | Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title_short | Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT |
title_sort | automated opportunistic trabecular volumetric bone mineral density extraction outperforms manual measurements for the prediction of vertebral fractures in routine ct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gollersophias automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT rischewskijonf automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT liebigthomas automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT rickejens automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT sillersebastian automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT schmidtvanessaf automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT stahlrobert automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT kulozikjulian automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT baumthomas automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT kirschkejans automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT foremansarahc automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect AT gersingalexandras automatedopportunistictrabecularvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionoutperformsmanualmeasurementsforthepredictionofvertebralfracturesinroutinect |