Cargando…

Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT

Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grazzini, Giulia, Danti, Ginevra, Chiti, Giuditta, Giannessi, Caterina, Pradella, Silvia, Miele, Vittorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122104
_version_ 1785063737634324480
author Grazzini, Giulia
Danti, Ginevra
Chiti, Giuditta
Giannessi, Caterina
Pradella, Silvia
Miele, Vittorio
author_facet Grazzini, Giulia
Danti, Ginevra
Chiti, Giuditta
Giannessi, Caterina
Pradella, Silvia
Miele, Vittorio
author_sort Grazzini, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or the mesorectal plane of surgical resection. In addition, the pattern of LR in rectal cancer has a prognostic significance and an important role in the choice of operative approach and. Therefore, an optimal follow up based on imaging is critical in rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to analyse the risk and the pattern of local recurrences in rectal cancer and to provide an overview of the role of imaging in early detection of LRs. We performed a literature review of studies published on Web of Science and MEDLINE up to January 2023. We also reviewed the current guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Although the timing and the modality of follow-up is not yet established, the guidelines usually recommend a time frame of 5 years post surgical resection of the rectum. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the main imaging techniques recommended in the follow-up of these patients. PET-CT is not recommended by guidelines during post-operative surveillance and it is generally used for problem solving.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10296819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102968192023-06-28 Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT Grazzini, Giulia Danti, Ginevra Chiti, Giuditta Giannessi, Caterina Pradella, Silvia Miele, Vittorio Diagnostics (Basel) Review Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or the mesorectal plane of surgical resection. In addition, the pattern of LR in rectal cancer has a prognostic significance and an important role in the choice of operative approach and. Therefore, an optimal follow up based on imaging is critical in rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to analyse the risk and the pattern of local recurrences in rectal cancer and to provide an overview of the role of imaging in early detection of LRs. We performed a literature review of studies published on Web of Science and MEDLINE up to January 2023. We also reviewed the current guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Although the timing and the modality of follow-up is not yet established, the guidelines usually recommend a time frame of 5 years post surgical resection of the rectum. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the main imaging techniques recommended in the follow-up of these patients. PET-CT is not recommended by guidelines during post-operative surveillance and it is generally used for problem solving. MDPI 2023-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10296819/ /pubmed/37370997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122104 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Grazzini, Giulia
Danti, Ginevra
Chiti, Giuditta
Giannessi, Caterina
Pradella, Silvia
Miele, Vittorio
Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title_full Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title_fullStr Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title_full_unstemmed Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title_short Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT
title_sort local recurrences in rectal cancer: mri vs. ct
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37370997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122104
work_keys_str_mv AT grazzinigiulia localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct
AT dantiginevra localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct
AT chitigiuditta localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct
AT giannessicaterina localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct
AT pradellasilvia localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct
AT mielevittorio localrecurrencesinrectalcancermrivsct