Cargando…

Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls

The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liqui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozimic, Sanja, Ban-Frangez, Helena, Stimpfel, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300
_version_ 1785063738847526912
author Ozimic, Sanja
Ban-Frangez, Helena
Stimpfel, Martin
author_facet Ozimic, Sanja
Ban-Frangez, Helena
Stimpfel, Martin
author_sort Ozimic, Sanja
collection PubMed
description The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liquid nitrogen vapors, while the use of vitrification is still not accepted as clinically relevant. Although there have been many improvements, the ideal technique for achieving better post-thaw sperm quality continues to be a mystery. A major obstacle during cryopreservation is the formation of intracellular ice crystals. Cryodamage generated by cryopreservation causes structural and molecular alterations in spermatozoa. Injuries can happen because of oxidative stress, temperature stress, and osmotic stress, which then result in changes in the plasma membrane fluidity, motility, viability, and DNA integrity of the spermatozoa. To prevent cryodamage as much as possible, cryoprotectants are added, and in some clinical trial cases, even antioxidants that may improve post-thaw sperm quality are added. This review discusses cryopreservation techniques, cryodamage on molecular and structural levels, and cryoprotectants. It provides a comparison of cryopreservation techniques and describes recent advances in those techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10296824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102968242023-06-28 Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls Ozimic, Sanja Ban-Frangez, Helena Stimpfel, Martin Curr Issues Mol Biol Review The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liquid nitrogen vapors, while the use of vitrification is still not accepted as clinically relevant. Although there have been many improvements, the ideal technique for achieving better post-thaw sperm quality continues to be a mystery. A major obstacle during cryopreservation is the formation of intracellular ice crystals. Cryodamage generated by cryopreservation causes structural and molecular alterations in spermatozoa. Injuries can happen because of oxidative stress, temperature stress, and osmotic stress, which then result in changes in the plasma membrane fluidity, motility, viability, and DNA integrity of the spermatozoa. To prevent cryodamage as much as possible, cryoprotectants are added, and in some clinical trial cases, even antioxidants that may improve post-thaw sperm quality are added. This review discusses cryopreservation techniques, cryodamage on molecular and structural levels, and cryoprotectants. It provides a comparison of cryopreservation techniques and describes recent advances in those techniques. MDPI 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10296824/ /pubmed/37367049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ozimic, Sanja
Ban-Frangez, Helena
Stimpfel, Martin
Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title_full Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title_fullStr Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title_short Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
title_sort sperm cryopreservation today: approaches, efficiency, and pitfalls
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367049
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300
work_keys_str_mv AT ozimicsanja spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls
AT banfrangezhelena spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls
AT stimpfelmartin spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls