Cargando…
Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls
The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liqui...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300 |
_version_ | 1785063738847526912 |
---|---|
author | Ozimic, Sanja Ban-Frangez, Helena Stimpfel, Martin |
author_facet | Ozimic, Sanja Ban-Frangez, Helena Stimpfel, Martin |
author_sort | Ozimic, Sanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liquid nitrogen vapors, while the use of vitrification is still not accepted as clinically relevant. Although there have been many improvements, the ideal technique for achieving better post-thaw sperm quality continues to be a mystery. A major obstacle during cryopreservation is the formation of intracellular ice crystals. Cryodamage generated by cryopreservation causes structural and molecular alterations in spermatozoa. Injuries can happen because of oxidative stress, temperature stress, and osmotic stress, which then result in changes in the plasma membrane fluidity, motility, viability, and DNA integrity of the spermatozoa. To prevent cryodamage as much as possible, cryoprotectants are added, and in some clinical trial cases, even antioxidants that may improve post-thaw sperm quality are added. This review discusses cryopreservation techniques, cryodamage on molecular and structural levels, and cryoprotectants. It provides a comparison of cryopreservation techniques and describes recent advances in those techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10296824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102968242023-06-28 Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls Ozimic, Sanja Ban-Frangez, Helena Stimpfel, Martin Curr Issues Mol Biol Review The cryopreservation of human spermatozoa has been an option for patients undergoing chemo or radiotherapies since the late 1950s. Presently, there are different techniques for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa. The most commonly used techniques are programmable slow freezing and freezing on liquid nitrogen vapors, while the use of vitrification is still not accepted as clinically relevant. Although there have been many improvements, the ideal technique for achieving better post-thaw sperm quality continues to be a mystery. A major obstacle during cryopreservation is the formation of intracellular ice crystals. Cryodamage generated by cryopreservation causes structural and molecular alterations in spermatozoa. Injuries can happen because of oxidative stress, temperature stress, and osmotic stress, which then result in changes in the plasma membrane fluidity, motility, viability, and DNA integrity of the spermatozoa. To prevent cryodamage as much as possible, cryoprotectants are added, and in some clinical trial cases, even antioxidants that may improve post-thaw sperm quality are added. This review discusses cryopreservation techniques, cryodamage on molecular and structural levels, and cryoprotectants. It provides a comparison of cryopreservation techniques and describes recent advances in those techniques. MDPI 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10296824/ /pubmed/37367049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ozimic, Sanja Ban-Frangez, Helena Stimpfel, Martin Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title | Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title_full | Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title_fullStr | Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed | Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title_short | Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls |
title_sort | sperm cryopreservation today: approaches, efficiency, and pitfalls |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367049 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozimicsanja spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls AT banfrangezhelena spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls AT stimpfelmartin spermcryopreservationtodayapproachesefficiencyandpitfalls |