Cargando…

Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach

Intradialytic hypotension is a common complication during hemodialysis sessions. The analysis of successive RR interval variability using nonlinear methods represents a promising tool for evaluating the cardiovascular response to acute volemic changes. Thus, the present study aims to compare the var...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Natália de Jesus, Oliveira, Alinne Alves, Costa, Silvania Moraes, Pirôpo, Uanderson Silva, Teles, Mauro Fernandes, de Freitas, Verônica Porto, de Souza, Dieslley Amorim, Pereira, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25060883
_version_ 1785063756825362432
author Oliveira, Natália de Jesus
Oliveira, Alinne Alves
Costa, Silvania Moraes
Pirôpo, Uanderson Silva
Teles, Mauro Fernandes
de Freitas, Verônica Porto
de Souza, Dieslley Amorim
Pereira, Rafael
author_facet Oliveira, Natália de Jesus
Oliveira, Alinne Alves
Costa, Silvania Moraes
Pirôpo, Uanderson Silva
Teles, Mauro Fernandes
de Freitas, Verônica Porto
de Souza, Dieslley Amorim
Pereira, Rafael
author_sort Oliveira, Natália de Jesus
collection PubMed
description Intradialytic hypotension is a common complication during hemodialysis sessions. The analysis of successive RR interval variability using nonlinear methods represents a promising tool for evaluating the cardiovascular response to acute volemic changes. Thus, the present study aims to compare the variability of successive RR intervals between hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable (HU) patients during a hemodialysis session, through linear and nonlinear methods. Forty-six chronic kidney disease patients volunteered in this study. Successive RR intervals and blood pressures were recorded throughout the hemodialysis session. Hemodynamic stability was defined based on the delta of systolic blood pressure (higher SBP-lower SBP). The cutoff for hemodynamic stability was defined as 30 mm Hg, and patients were stratified as: HS ([n = 21]: ≤29.9 mm Hg) or HU ([n = 25]: ≥30 mm Hg). Linear methods (low-frequency [LFnu] and high-frequency [HFnu] spectra) and nonlinear methods (multiscale entropy [MSE] for Scales 1–20, and fuzzy entropy) were applied. The area under the MSE curve at Scales 1–5 (MSE(1–5)), 6–20 (MSE(6–20)), and 1–20 (MSE(1–20)) were also used as nonlinear parameters. Frequentist and Bayesian inferences were applied to compare HS and HU patients. The HS patients exhibited a significantly higher LFnu and lower HFnu. For MSE parameters, Scales 3–20 were significantly higher, as well as MSE(1–5), MSE(6–20), and MSE(1–20) in HS, when compared to HU patients (p < 0.05). Regarding Bayesian inference, the spectral parameters demonstrated an anecdotal (65.9%) posterior probability favoring the alternative hypothesis, while MSE exhibited moderate to very strong probability (79.4 to 96.3%) at Scales 3–20, and MSE(1–5), MSE(6–20), and MSE(1–20). HS patients exhibited a higher heart-rate complexity than HU patients. In addition, the MSE demonstrated a greater potential than spectral methods to differentiate variability patterns in successive RR intervals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10296899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102968992023-06-28 Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach Oliveira, Natália de Jesus Oliveira, Alinne Alves Costa, Silvania Moraes Pirôpo, Uanderson Silva Teles, Mauro Fernandes de Freitas, Verônica Porto de Souza, Dieslley Amorim Pereira, Rafael Entropy (Basel) Article Intradialytic hypotension is a common complication during hemodialysis sessions. The analysis of successive RR interval variability using nonlinear methods represents a promising tool for evaluating the cardiovascular response to acute volemic changes. Thus, the present study aims to compare the variability of successive RR intervals between hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable (HU) patients during a hemodialysis session, through linear and nonlinear methods. Forty-six chronic kidney disease patients volunteered in this study. Successive RR intervals and blood pressures were recorded throughout the hemodialysis session. Hemodynamic stability was defined based on the delta of systolic blood pressure (higher SBP-lower SBP). The cutoff for hemodynamic stability was defined as 30 mm Hg, and patients were stratified as: HS ([n = 21]: ≤29.9 mm Hg) or HU ([n = 25]: ≥30 mm Hg). Linear methods (low-frequency [LFnu] and high-frequency [HFnu] spectra) and nonlinear methods (multiscale entropy [MSE] for Scales 1–20, and fuzzy entropy) were applied. The area under the MSE curve at Scales 1–5 (MSE(1–5)), 6–20 (MSE(6–20)), and 1–20 (MSE(1–20)) were also used as nonlinear parameters. Frequentist and Bayesian inferences were applied to compare HS and HU patients. The HS patients exhibited a significantly higher LFnu and lower HFnu. For MSE parameters, Scales 3–20 were significantly higher, as well as MSE(1–5), MSE(6–20), and MSE(1–20) in HS, when compared to HU patients (p < 0.05). Regarding Bayesian inference, the spectral parameters demonstrated an anecdotal (65.9%) posterior probability favoring the alternative hypothesis, while MSE exhibited moderate to very strong probability (79.4 to 96.3%) at Scales 3–20, and MSE(1–5), MSE(6–20), and MSE(1–20). HS patients exhibited a higher heart-rate complexity than HU patients. In addition, the MSE demonstrated a greater potential than spectral methods to differentiate variability patterns in successive RR intervals. MDPI 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10296899/ /pubmed/37372226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25060883 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oliveira, Natália de Jesus
Oliveira, Alinne Alves
Costa, Silvania Moraes
Pirôpo, Uanderson Silva
Teles, Mauro Fernandes
de Freitas, Verônica Porto
de Souza, Dieslley Amorim
Pereira, Rafael
Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title_full Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title_fullStr Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title_short Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach
title_sort comparison of heart autonomic control between hemodynamically stable and unstable patients during hemodialysis sessions: a bayesian approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25060883
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiranataliadejesus comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT oliveiraalinnealves comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT costasilvaniamoraes comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT piropouandersonsilva comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT telesmaurofernandes comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT defreitasveronicaporto comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT desouzadieslleyamorim comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach
AT pereirarafael comparisonofheartautonomiccontrolbetweenhemodynamicallystableandunstablepatientsduringhemodialysissessionsabayesianapproach