Cargando…

Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?

Background: Older patients with malignancies are more comorbid than younger ones and are usually undertreated only because of their age. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of open anatomical lung resections for lung cancer in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagopoulos, Nikolaos, Grapatsas, Konstantinos, Leivaditis, Vasileios, Galanis, Michail, Dougenis, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30060414
_version_ 1785063895504781312
author Panagopoulos, Nikolaos
Grapatsas, Konstantinos
Leivaditis, Vasileios
Galanis, Michail
Dougenis, Dimitrios
author_facet Panagopoulos, Nikolaos
Grapatsas, Konstantinos
Leivaditis, Vasileios
Galanis, Michail
Dougenis, Dimitrios
author_sort Panagopoulos, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description Background: Older patients with malignancies are more comorbid than younger ones and are usually undertreated only because of their age. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of open anatomical lung resections for lung cancer in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer in our institution and categorized them into two groups: the elderly group (≥70 years old) and the control (<70). Results: In total, 135 patients were included in the elderly group and 375 in the control. Elderly patients were more frequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (59.3% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.037), higher differentiated tumors (12.6% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.014), and at an earlier stage (stage I: 55.6% for elderly vs. 36.6%, p = 0.002). Elderly patients were more vulnerable to postoperative pneumonia (3.7% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.034), lung atelectasis (7.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.040), and pleural empyema (3.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.042), however, with no increased 30-day-mortality (5.2% for elderly vs. 2.7%, p = 0.168). Survival was comparable in both groups (43.4 vs. 45.3 months, p = 0.579). Conclusions: Elderly patients should not be excluded from open major lung resections as the survival benefit is not reduced in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10297488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102974882023-06-28 Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified? Panagopoulos, Nikolaos Grapatsas, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Vasileios Galanis, Michail Dougenis, Dimitrios Curr Oncol Article Background: Older patients with malignancies are more comorbid than younger ones and are usually undertreated only because of their age. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of open anatomical lung resections for lung cancer in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer in our institution and categorized them into two groups: the elderly group (≥70 years old) and the control (<70). Results: In total, 135 patients were included in the elderly group and 375 in the control. Elderly patients were more frequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (59.3% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.037), higher differentiated tumors (12.6% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.014), and at an earlier stage (stage I: 55.6% for elderly vs. 36.6%, p = 0.002). Elderly patients were more vulnerable to postoperative pneumonia (3.7% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.034), lung atelectasis (7.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.040), and pleural empyema (3.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.042), however, with no increased 30-day-mortality (5.2% for elderly vs. 2.7%, p = 0.168). Survival was comparable in both groups (43.4 vs. 45.3 months, p = 0.579). Conclusions: Elderly patients should not be excluded from open major lung resections as the survival benefit is not reduced in selected patients. MDPI 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10297488/ /pubmed/37366897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30060414 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panagopoulos, Nikolaos
Grapatsas, Konstantinos
Leivaditis, Vasileios
Galanis, Michail
Dougenis, Dimitrios
Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title_full Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title_fullStr Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title_full_unstemmed Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title_short Are Extensive Open Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer Justified?
title_sort are extensive open lung resections for elderly patients with lung cancer justified?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30060414
work_keys_str_mv AT panagopoulosnikolaos areextensiveopenlungresectionsforelderlypatientswithlungcancerjustified
AT grapatsaskonstantinos areextensiveopenlungresectionsforelderlypatientswithlungcancerjustified
AT leivaditisvasileios areextensiveopenlungresectionsforelderlypatientswithlungcancerjustified
AT galanismichail areextensiveopenlungresectionsforelderlypatientswithlungcancerjustified
AT dougenisdimitrios areextensiveopenlungresectionsforelderlypatientswithlungcancerjustified