Cargando…

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach

Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parente, Giovanni, Ruspi, Francesca, Thomas, Eduje, Di Mitri, Marco, Cravano, Sara Maria, D’Antonio, Simone, Gargano, Tommaso, Lima, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063
_version_ 1785063940997251072
author Parente, Giovanni
Ruspi, Francesca
Thomas, Eduje
Di Mitri, Marco
Cravano, Sara Maria
D’Antonio, Simone
Gargano, Tommaso
Lima, Mario
author_facet Parente, Giovanni
Ruspi, Francesca
Thomas, Eduje
Di Mitri, Marco
Cravano, Sara Maria
D’Antonio, Simone
Gargano, Tommaso
Lima, Mario
author_sort Parente, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is to verify the superior outcomes of EPSiT, especially in comparison with the traditional open approach, and discuss the operators’ learning curve. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted identifying all the patients who underwent surgical treatment for PNS with EPSiT technique between 2019 and 2022 and with open technique between 2002 and 2022. We divided patients in two groups: open procedure (group 1) and EPSiT (group 2). We considered a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time was 58.6 ± 23.7 min for group 1 and 42.8 ± 17.4 min for group 2 (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was 2.6 ± 1.7 days for group 1 patients and of 0.8 ± 0.4 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Complete healing was obtained in 18.7 ± 5.6 days for group 1 and 38.3 ± 23.5 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Recurrences were of 23.4% for group 1 and 5.4% for group 2 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: EPSiT is a minimally invasive and effective approach for the treatment of pilonidal cyst that can be safely performed in pediatric patients with promising results concerning aesthetic outcome and pain control, and with a rapid and less complicated recovery compared to traditional open procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10297686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102976862023-06-28 Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach Parente, Giovanni Ruspi, Francesca Thomas, Eduje Di Mitri, Marco Cravano, Sara Maria D’Antonio, Simone Gargano, Tommaso Lima, Mario Children (Basel) Article Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is to verify the superior outcomes of EPSiT, especially in comparison with the traditional open approach, and discuss the operators’ learning curve. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted identifying all the patients who underwent surgical treatment for PNS with EPSiT technique between 2019 and 2022 and with open technique between 2002 and 2022. We divided patients in two groups: open procedure (group 1) and EPSiT (group 2). We considered a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time was 58.6 ± 23.7 min for group 1 and 42.8 ± 17.4 min for group 2 (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was 2.6 ± 1.7 days for group 1 patients and of 0.8 ± 0.4 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Complete healing was obtained in 18.7 ± 5.6 days for group 1 and 38.3 ± 23.5 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Recurrences were of 23.4% for group 1 and 5.4% for group 2 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: EPSiT is a minimally invasive and effective approach for the treatment of pilonidal cyst that can be safely performed in pediatric patients with promising results concerning aesthetic outcome and pain control, and with a rapid and less complicated recovery compared to traditional open procedures. MDPI 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10297686/ /pubmed/37371294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Parente, Giovanni
Ruspi, Francesca
Thomas, Eduje
Di Mitri, Marco
Cravano, Sara Maria
D’Antonio, Simone
Gargano, Tommaso
Lima, Mario
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title_full Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title_fullStr Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title_short Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
title_sort endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: preliminary results, learning curve and comparison with standard open approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063
work_keys_str_mv AT parentegiovanni endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT ruspifrancesca endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT thomaseduje endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT dimitrimarco endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT cravanosaramaria endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT dantoniosimone endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT garganotommaso endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach
AT limamario endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach