Cargando…
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach
Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063 |
_version_ | 1785063940997251072 |
---|---|
author | Parente, Giovanni Ruspi, Francesca Thomas, Eduje Di Mitri, Marco Cravano, Sara Maria D’Antonio, Simone Gargano, Tommaso Lima, Mario |
author_facet | Parente, Giovanni Ruspi, Francesca Thomas, Eduje Di Mitri, Marco Cravano, Sara Maria D’Antonio, Simone Gargano, Tommaso Lima, Mario |
author_sort | Parente, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is to verify the superior outcomes of EPSiT, especially in comparison with the traditional open approach, and discuss the operators’ learning curve. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted identifying all the patients who underwent surgical treatment for PNS with EPSiT technique between 2019 and 2022 and with open technique between 2002 and 2022. We divided patients in two groups: open procedure (group 1) and EPSiT (group 2). We considered a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time was 58.6 ± 23.7 min for group 1 and 42.8 ± 17.4 min for group 2 (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was 2.6 ± 1.7 days for group 1 patients and of 0.8 ± 0.4 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Complete healing was obtained in 18.7 ± 5.6 days for group 1 and 38.3 ± 23.5 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Recurrences were of 23.4% for group 1 and 5.4% for group 2 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: EPSiT is a minimally invasive and effective approach for the treatment of pilonidal cyst that can be safely performed in pediatric patients with promising results concerning aesthetic outcome and pain control, and with a rapid and less complicated recovery compared to traditional open procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10297686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102976862023-06-28 Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach Parente, Giovanni Ruspi, Francesca Thomas, Eduje Di Mitri, Marco Cravano, Sara Maria D’Antonio, Simone Gargano, Tommaso Lima, Mario Children (Basel) Article Background: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common disease which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Different surgical approaches have been suggested, based on primary or secondary wound closure intention healing or endoscopic treatment (EPSiT). The aim of this study is to verify the superior outcomes of EPSiT, especially in comparison with the traditional open approach, and discuss the operators’ learning curve. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted identifying all the patients who underwent surgical treatment for PNS with EPSiT technique between 2019 and 2022 and with open technique between 2002 and 2022. We divided patients in two groups: open procedure (group 1) and EPSiT (group 2). We considered a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time was 58.6 ± 23.7 min for group 1 and 42.8 ± 17.4 min for group 2 (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was 2.6 ± 1.7 days for group 1 patients and of 0.8 ± 0.4 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Complete healing was obtained in 18.7 ± 5.6 days for group 1 and 38.3 ± 23.5 days for group 2 (p < 0.01). Recurrences were of 23.4% for group 1 and 5.4% for group 2 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: EPSiT is a minimally invasive and effective approach for the treatment of pilonidal cyst that can be safely performed in pediatric patients with promising results concerning aesthetic outcome and pain control, and with a rapid and less complicated recovery compared to traditional open procedures. MDPI 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10297686/ /pubmed/37371294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Parente, Giovanni Ruspi, Francesca Thomas, Eduje Di Mitri, Marco Cravano, Sara Maria D’Antonio, Simone Gargano, Tommaso Lima, Mario Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title | Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title_full | Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title_short | Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach |
title_sort | endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: preliminary results, learning curve and comparison with standard open approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37371294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10061063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parentegiovanni endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT ruspifrancesca endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT thomaseduje endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT dimitrimarco endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT cravanosaramaria endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT dantoniosimone endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT garganotommaso endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach AT limamario endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentpreliminaryresultslearningcurveandcomparisonwithstandardopenapproach |