Cargando…
Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem
In 2006, the U.S. federal government launched a project to create a cheap, easily produced, and easy to use ventilator that could be stored for long periods of time for pandemic response. Despite successful funding and contracts with two separate medical device companies, not a single ventilator had...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100069 |
_version_ | 1785063964503179264 |
---|---|
author | Tiffney, Theora W. Cook-Deegan, Robert Ross, Heather M. |
author_facet | Tiffney, Theora W. Cook-Deegan, Robert Ross, Heather M. |
author_sort | Tiffney, Theora W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2006, the U.S. federal government launched a project to create a cheap, easily produced, and easy to use ventilator that could be stored for long periods of time for pandemic response. Despite successful funding and contracts with two separate medical device companies, not a single ventilator had been added to the stockpile by 2020. The company currently under federal contract for these ventilators is selling its product to private parties, rather than supplying it to the federal government. In the current crisis, government has instead turned to the Defense Production Act to supply ventilators. Inaccessibility of medical equipment is a detriment to Americans’ health, particularly during a public health emergency like COVID-19. This persists despite the central role of the federal government in the funding of healthcare innovation. We place the shortage of ventilators in context of the ongoing debate about the federal government’s intellectual property powers, as well as the legal recourses available, then discuss why this situation is a strong argument for expanding compulsory licensing powers as a component of federal policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10297820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102978202023-06-28 Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem Tiffney, Theora W. Cook-Deegan, Robert Ross, Heather M. Health Policy Open Original Article In 2006, the U.S. federal government launched a project to create a cheap, easily produced, and easy to use ventilator that could be stored for long periods of time for pandemic response. Despite successful funding and contracts with two separate medical device companies, not a single ventilator had been added to the stockpile by 2020. The company currently under federal contract for these ventilators is selling its product to private parties, rather than supplying it to the federal government. In the current crisis, government has instead turned to the Defense Production Act to supply ventilators. Inaccessibility of medical equipment is a detriment to Americans’ health, particularly during a public health emergency like COVID-19. This persists despite the central role of the federal government in the funding of healthcare innovation. We place the shortage of ventilators in context of the ongoing debate about the federal government’s intellectual property powers, as well as the legal recourses available, then discuss why this situation is a strong argument for expanding compulsory licensing powers as a component of federal policy. Elsevier 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10297820/ /pubmed/37383575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100069 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tiffney, Theora W. Cook-Deegan, Robert Ross, Heather M. Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title | Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title_full | Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title_fullStr | Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title_full_unstemmed | Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title_short | Breathing fresh air into the debate: Ventilators and the United States' intellectual property problem |
title_sort | breathing fresh air into the debate: ventilators and the united states' intellectual property problem |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiffneytheoraw breathingfreshairintothedebateventilatorsandtheunitedstatesintellectualpropertyproblem AT cookdeeganrobert breathingfreshairintothedebateventilatorsandtheunitedstatesintellectualpropertyproblem AT rossheatherm breathingfreshairintothedebateventilatorsandtheunitedstatesintellectualpropertyproblem |