Cargando…
Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10298091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785 |
_version_ | 1785064029912301568 |
---|---|
author | Migliorelli, Andrea Sgarzani, Rossella Cammaroto, Giovanni De Vito, Andrea Gessaroli, Manlio Manuelli, Marianna Ciorba, Andrea Bianchini, Chiara Pelucchi, Stefano Meccariello, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Migliorelli, Andrea Sgarzani, Rossella Cammaroto, Giovanni De Vito, Andrea Gessaroli, Manlio Manuelli, Marianna Ciorba, Andrea Bianchini, Chiara Pelucchi, Stefano Meccariello, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Migliorelli, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)” for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10298091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102980912023-06-28 Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art Migliorelli, Andrea Sgarzani, Rossella Cammaroto, Giovanni De Vito, Andrea Gessaroli, Manlio Manuelli, Marianna Ciorba, Andrea Bianchini, Chiara Pelucchi, Stefano Meccariello, Giuseppe Healthcare (Basel) Review Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)” for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient. MDPI 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10298091/ /pubmed/37372903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Migliorelli, Andrea Sgarzani, Rossella Cammaroto, Giovanni De Vito, Andrea Gessaroli, Manlio Manuelli, Marianna Ciorba, Andrea Bianchini, Chiara Pelucchi, Stefano Meccariello, Giuseppe Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title | Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title_full | Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title_fullStr | Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title_short | Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art |
title_sort | reconstructive options after oncological rhinectomy: state of the art |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10298091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT migliorelliandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT sgarzanirossella reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT cammarotogiovanni reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT devitoandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT gessarolimanlio reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT manuellimarianna reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT ciorbaandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT bianchinichiara reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT pelucchistefano reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart AT meccariellogiuseppe reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart |