Cargando…

Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art

Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorelli, Andrea, Sgarzani, Rossella, Cammaroto, Giovanni, De Vito, Andrea, Gessaroli, Manlio, Manuelli, Marianna, Ciorba, Andrea, Bianchini, Chiara, Pelucchi, Stefano, Meccariello, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10298091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785
_version_ 1785064029912301568
author Migliorelli, Andrea
Sgarzani, Rossella
Cammaroto, Giovanni
De Vito, Andrea
Gessaroli, Manlio
Manuelli, Marianna
Ciorba, Andrea
Bianchini, Chiara
Pelucchi, Stefano
Meccariello, Giuseppe
author_facet Migliorelli, Andrea
Sgarzani, Rossella
Cammaroto, Giovanni
De Vito, Andrea
Gessaroli, Manlio
Manuelli, Marianna
Ciorba, Andrea
Bianchini, Chiara
Pelucchi, Stefano
Meccariello, Giuseppe
author_sort Migliorelli, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)” for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10298091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102980912023-06-28 Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art Migliorelli, Andrea Sgarzani, Rossella Cammaroto, Giovanni De Vito, Andrea Gessaroli, Manlio Manuelli, Marianna Ciorba, Andrea Bianchini, Chiara Pelucchi, Stefano Meccariello, Giuseppe Healthcare (Basel) Review Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual’s recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)” for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient. MDPI 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10298091/ /pubmed/37372903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Migliorelli, Andrea
Sgarzani, Rossella
Cammaroto, Giovanni
De Vito, Andrea
Gessaroli, Manlio
Manuelli, Marianna
Ciorba, Andrea
Bianchini, Chiara
Pelucchi, Stefano
Meccariello, Giuseppe
Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title_full Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title_fullStr Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title_short Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art
title_sort reconstructive options after oncological rhinectomy: state of the art
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10298091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37372903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121785
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorelliandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT sgarzanirossella reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT cammarotogiovanni reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT devitoandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT gessarolimanlio reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT manuellimarianna reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT ciorbaandrea reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT bianchinichiara reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT pelucchistefano reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart
AT meccariellogiuseppe reconstructiveoptionsafteroncologicalrhinectomystateoftheart