Cargando…
Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema
(1) Purpose: To determine the “retinal thickness deviation” (RTD) in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes treated with intravitreal therapy and to establish associations between RTD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, including consecutive patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123976 |
_version_ | 1785064280714903552 |
---|---|
author | Marolo, Paola Borrelli, Enrico Gelormini, Francesco Boscia, Giacomo Parisi, Guglielmo Fallico, Matteo Barresi, Costanza Lari, Giorgio Berni, Alessandro Bandello, Francesco Reibaldi, Michele |
author_facet | Marolo, Paola Borrelli, Enrico Gelormini, Francesco Boscia, Giacomo Parisi, Guglielmo Fallico, Matteo Barresi, Costanza Lari, Giorgio Berni, Alessandro Bandello, Francesco Reibaldi, Michele |
author_sort | Marolo, Paola |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Purpose: To determine the “retinal thickness deviation” (RTD) in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes treated with intravitreal therapy and to establish associations between RTD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, including consecutive patients with DME eyes undergoing intravitreal therapy with two years of follow-up. BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) were collected at baseline and at 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. RTD was calculated as the absolute difference between measured and normative CST values at each time point. Linear regression analyses were performed between RTD and BCVA and between CST and BCVA. (3) Results: One hundred and four eyes were included in the analysis. The RTD was 177.0 (117.2) μm at baseline, 97.0 (99.7) μm at 12 months and 89.9 (75.3) μm at 24 months of follow-up (p < 0.001). RTD showed a moderate association with BCVA at baseline (R(2) = 0.134, p < 0.001) and 12 months (R(2) = 0.197, p < 0.001) and a substantial association at 24 months (R(2) = 0.272, p < 0.001). The CST showed a moderate association with BCVA at baseline (R(2) = 0.132, p < 0.001) and 12 months (R(2) = 0.136, p < 0.001), while the association was weak at 24 months (R(2) = 0.065, p = 0.009). (4) Conclusions: RTD showed a good association with visual outcome in patients with DME eyes undergoing intravitreal treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102991002023-06-28 Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema Marolo, Paola Borrelli, Enrico Gelormini, Francesco Boscia, Giacomo Parisi, Guglielmo Fallico, Matteo Barresi, Costanza Lari, Giorgio Berni, Alessandro Bandello, Francesco Reibaldi, Michele J Clin Med Article (1) Purpose: To determine the “retinal thickness deviation” (RTD) in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes treated with intravitreal therapy and to establish associations between RTD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, including consecutive patients with DME eyes undergoing intravitreal therapy with two years of follow-up. BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) were collected at baseline and at 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. RTD was calculated as the absolute difference between measured and normative CST values at each time point. Linear regression analyses were performed between RTD and BCVA and between CST and BCVA. (3) Results: One hundred and four eyes were included in the analysis. The RTD was 177.0 (117.2) μm at baseline, 97.0 (99.7) μm at 12 months and 89.9 (75.3) μm at 24 months of follow-up (p < 0.001). RTD showed a moderate association with BCVA at baseline (R(2) = 0.134, p < 0.001) and 12 months (R(2) = 0.197, p < 0.001) and a substantial association at 24 months (R(2) = 0.272, p < 0.001). The CST showed a moderate association with BCVA at baseline (R(2) = 0.132, p < 0.001) and 12 months (R(2) = 0.136, p < 0.001), while the association was weak at 24 months (R(2) = 0.065, p = 0.009). (4) Conclusions: RTD showed a good association with visual outcome in patients with DME eyes undergoing intravitreal treatment. MDPI 2023-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10299100/ /pubmed/37373669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123976 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marolo, Paola Borrelli, Enrico Gelormini, Francesco Boscia, Giacomo Parisi, Guglielmo Fallico, Matteo Barresi, Costanza Lari, Giorgio Berni, Alessandro Bandello, Francesco Reibaldi, Michele Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title | Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full | Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_fullStr | Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_full_unstemmed | Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_short | Retinal Thickness Deviation: A New OCT Parameter for Assessing Diabetic Macular Edema |
title_sort | retinal thickness deviation: a new oct parameter for assessing diabetic macular edema |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marolopaola retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT borrellienrico retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT gelorminifrancesco retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT bosciagiacomo retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT parisiguglielmo retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT fallicomatteo retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT barresicostanza retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT larigiorgio retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT bernialessandro retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT bandellofrancesco retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema AT reibaldimichele retinalthicknessdeviationanewoctparameterforassessingdiabeticmacularedema |