Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379 |
_version_ | 1785064287542181888 |
---|---|
author | Rissel, Florian Cazaubon, Yoann Saffar, Syrine Altwegg, Romain Artasone, Mélanie Lozano, Claire Vincent, Thierry Jentzer, Alexandre |
author_facet | Rissel, Florian Cazaubon, Yoann Saffar, Syrine Altwegg, Romain Artasone, Mélanie Lozano, Claire Vincent, Thierry Jentzer, Alexandre |
author_sort | Rissel, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX) and 49 sera from patients treated with adalimumab (ADAL) were monitored with four immunoassays. We have compared Promonitor, i-Track10(®), and ez-track1 assays to our gold standard Lisa Tracker(®) ELISA using Cohen’s kappa, Passing-Bablok, and Bland–Altman analysis. The qualitative analysis evaluated by Cohen’s kappa values found for IFX measurements an “almost perfect” concordance for Promonitor, “moderate” for i-Track10(®) and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For ADAL, kappa values were “moderate” for all tested methods. For anti-IFX, kappa values were “almost perfect” for Promonitor, “fair” for i-Track10(®), and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For anti-ADAL, kappa values were “almost perfect” for all three assays. For quantitative analysis of drug measurements, Pearson’s r values were all above 0.9 and Lin’s concordance coefficients of all immunoassays were around 0.80. Performances of the four evaluated immunoassays were acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. Nevertheless, concordance between the four methods for IFX measurement was not perfect and we recommend the use of the same assay for the follow-up of a given patient. The performances of the four immunoassays evaluated were similar and are acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102991292023-06-28 Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab Rissel, Florian Cazaubon, Yoann Saffar, Syrine Altwegg, Romain Artasone, Mélanie Lozano, Claire Vincent, Thierry Jentzer, Alexandre Int J Mol Sci Article Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX) and 49 sera from patients treated with adalimumab (ADAL) were monitored with four immunoassays. We have compared Promonitor, i-Track10(®), and ez-track1 assays to our gold standard Lisa Tracker(®) ELISA using Cohen’s kappa, Passing-Bablok, and Bland–Altman analysis. The qualitative analysis evaluated by Cohen’s kappa values found for IFX measurements an “almost perfect” concordance for Promonitor, “moderate” for i-Track10(®) and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For ADAL, kappa values were “moderate” for all tested methods. For anti-IFX, kappa values were “almost perfect” for Promonitor, “fair” for i-Track10(®), and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For anti-ADAL, kappa values were “almost perfect” for all three assays. For quantitative analysis of drug measurements, Pearson’s r values were all above 0.9 and Lin’s concordance coefficients of all immunoassays were around 0.80. Performances of the four evaluated immunoassays were acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. Nevertheless, concordance between the four methods for IFX measurement was not perfect and we recommend the use of the same assay for the follow-up of a given patient. The performances of the four immunoassays evaluated were similar and are acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10299129/ /pubmed/37373525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rissel, Florian Cazaubon, Yoann Saffar, Syrine Altwegg, Romain Artasone, Mélanie Lozano, Claire Vincent, Thierry Jentzer, Alexandre Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of four commercially available immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT risselflorian comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT cazaubonyoann comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT saffarsyrine comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT altweggromain comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT artasonemelanie comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT lozanoclaire comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT vincentthierry comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab AT jentzeralexandre comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab |