Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rissel, Florian, Cazaubon, Yoann, Saffar, Syrine, Altwegg, Romain, Artasone, Mélanie, Lozano, Claire, Vincent, Thierry, Jentzer, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379
_version_ 1785064287542181888
author Rissel, Florian
Cazaubon, Yoann
Saffar, Syrine
Altwegg, Romain
Artasone, Mélanie
Lozano, Claire
Vincent, Thierry
Jentzer, Alexandre
author_facet Rissel, Florian
Cazaubon, Yoann
Saffar, Syrine
Altwegg, Romain
Artasone, Mélanie
Lozano, Claire
Vincent, Thierry
Jentzer, Alexandre
author_sort Rissel, Florian
collection PubMed
description Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX) and 49 sera from patients treated with adalimumab (ADAL) were monitored with four immunoassays. We have compared Promonitor, i-Track10(®), and ez-track1 assays to our gold standard Lisa Tracker(®) ELISA using Cohen’s kappa, Passing-Bablok, and Bland–Altman analysis. The qualitative analysis evaluated by Cohen’s kappa values found for IFX measurements an “almost perfect” concordance for Promonitor, “moderate” for i-Track10(®) and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For ADAL, kappa values were “moderate” for all tested methods. For anti-IFX, kappa values were “almost perfect” for Promonitor, “fair” for i-Track10(®), and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For anti-ADAL, kappa values were “almost perfect” for all three assays. For quantitative analysis of drug measurements, Pearson’s r values were all above 0.9 and Lin’s concordance coefficients of all immunoassays were around 0.80. Performances of the four evaluated immunoassays were acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. Nevertheless, concordance between the four methods for IFX measurement was not perfect and we recommend the use of the same assay for the follow-up of a given patient. The performances of the four immunoassays evaluated were similar and are acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102991292023-06-28 Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab Rissel, Florian Cazaubon, Yoann Saffar, Syrine Altwegg, Romain Artasone, Mélanie Lozano, Claire Vincent, Thierry Jentzer, Alexandre Int J Mol Sci Article Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-TNF-α is an important tool in clinical practice for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of several assays for drug and antidrug antibodies (ADA) measurement in the serum. 50 sera from patients treated with infliximab (IFX) and 49 sera from patients treated with adalimumab (ADAL) were monitored with four immunoassays. We have compared Promonitor, i-Track10(®), and ez-track1 assays to our gold standard Lisa Tracker(®) ELISA using Cohen’s kappa, Passing-Bablok, and Bland–Altman analysis. The qualitative analysis evaluated by Cohen’s kappa values found for IFX measurements an “almost perfect” concordance for Promonitor, “moderate” for i-Track10(®) and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For ADAL, kappa values were “moderate” for all tested methods. For anti-IFX, kappa values were “almost perfect” for Promonitor, “fair” for i-Track10(®), and “substantial” for ez-Track1. For anti-ADAL, kappa values were “almost perfect” for all three assays. For quantitative analysis of drug measurements, Pearson’s r values were all above 0.9 and Lin’s concordance coefficients of all immunoassays were around 0.80. Performances of the four evaluated immunoassays were acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. Nevertheless, concordance between the four methods for IFX measurement was not perfect and we recommend the use of the same assay for the follow-up of a given patient. The performances of the four immunoassays evaluated were similar and are acceptable for TDM based on our laboratory experience. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10299129/ /pubmed/37373525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rissel, Florian
Cazaubon, Yoann
Saffar, Syrine
Altwegg, Romain
Artasone, Mélanie
Lozano, Claire
Vincent, Thierry
Jentzer, Alexandre
Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Immunoassays for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab and Adalimumab
title_sort comparative evaluation of four commercially available immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210379
work_keys_str_mv AT risselflorian comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT cazaubonyoann comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT saffarsyrine comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT altweggromain comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT artasonemelanie comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT lozanoclaire comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT vincentthierry comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab
AT jentzeralexandre comparativeevaluationoffourcommerciallyavailableimmunoassaysfortherapeuticdrugmonitoringofinfliximabandadalimumab