Cargando…
Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002 |
_version_ | 1785064293725634560 |
---|---|
author | Queissert, Fabian Huesch, Tanja Kretschmer, Alexander Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Pottek, Tobias Olianas, Roberto Friedl, Alexander Homberg, Roland Pfitzenmaier, Jesco Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Hofmann, Torben Rose, Achim Weidemann, Christian Wotzka, Carola Hübner, Wilhelm Loertzer, Hagen Abdunnur, Rudi Grabbert, Markus Anding, Ralf Bauer, Ricarda M. Haferkamp, Axel Schrader, Andres J. |
author_facet | Queissert, Fabian Huesch, Tanja Kretschmer, Alexander Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Pottek, Tobias Olianas, Roberto Friedl, Alexander Homberg, Roland Pfitzenmaier, Jesco Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Hofmann, Torben Rose, Achim Weidemann, Christian Wotzka, Carola Hübner, Wilhelm Loertzer, Hagen Abdunnur, Rudi Grabbert, Markus Anding, Ralf Bauer, Ricarda M. Haferkamp, Axel Schrader, Andres J. |
author_sort | Queissert, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%; p = 0.08). Revision was required significantly more often for this group (43.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.05) due to urethral erosion in 18 of 25 cases. A stenosis recurred in five cases; desobstruction was performed in two cases, leading to erosion in both. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of revision when recurrent stenosis necessitated at least two prior desobstructions (HR 2.8; p = 0.003). Conclusions: A devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102991542023-06-28 Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? Queissert, Fabian Huesch, Tanja Kretschmer, Alexander Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Pottek, Tobias Olianas, Roberto Friedl, Alexander Homberg, Roland Pfitzenmaier, Jesco Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Hofmann, Torben Rose, Achim Weidemann, Christian Wotzka, Carola Hübner, Wilhelm Loertzer, Hagen Abdunnur, Rudi Grabbert, Markus Anding, Ralf Bauer, Ricarda M. Haferkamp, Axel Schrader, Andres J. J Clin Med Article Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%; p = 0.08). Revision was required significantly more often for this group (43.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.05) due to urethral erosion in 18 of 25 cases. A stenosis recurred in five cases; desobstruction was performed in two cases, leading to erosion in both. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of revision when recurrent stenosis necessitated at least two prior desobstructions (HR 2.8; p = 0.003). Conclusions: A devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis. MDPI 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10299154/ /pubmed/37373698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Queissert, Fabian Huesch, Tanja Kretschmer, Alexander Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Pottek, Tobias Olianas, Roberto Friedl, Alexander Homberg, Roland Pfitzenmaier, Jesco Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Hofmann, Torben Rose, Achim Weidemann, Christian Wotzka, Carola Hübner, Wilhelm Loertzer, Hagen Abdunnur, Rudi Grabbert, Markus Anding, Ralf Bauer, Ricarda M. Haferkamp, Axel Schrader, Andres J. Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title | Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title_full | Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title_fullStr | Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title_short | Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? |
title_sort | is the standard artificial urinary sphincter ams 800 still a treatment option for the irradiated male patient presenting with a devastated bladder outlet? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT queissertfabian isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT hueschtanja isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT kretschmeralexander isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT kirschnerhermannsruth isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT pottektobias isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT olianasroberto isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT friedlalexander isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT hombergroland isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT pfitzenmaierjesco isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT naumanncarstenm isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT nyarangidixjoanne isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT hofmanntorben isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT roseachim isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT weidemannchristian isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT wotzkacarola isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT hubnerwilhelm isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT loertzerhagen isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT abdunnurrudi isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT grabbertmarkus isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT andingralf isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT bauerricardam isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT haferkampaxel isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet AT schraderandresj isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet |