Cargando…

Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?

Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Queissert, Fabian, Huesch, Tanja, Kretschmer, Alexander, Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth, Pottek, Tobias, Olianas, Roberto, Friedl, Alexander, Homberg, Roland, Pfitzenmaier, Jesco, Naumann, Carsten M., Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne, Hofmann, Torben, Rose, Achim, Weidemann, Christian, Wotzka, Carola, Hübner, Wilhelm, Loertzer, Hagen, Abdunnur, Rudi, Grabbert, Markus, Anding, Ralf, Bauer, Ricarda M., Haferkamp, Axel, Schrader, Andres J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002
_version_ 1785064293725634560
author Queissert, Fabian
Huesch, Tanja
Kretschmer, Alexander
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Pottek, Tobias
Olianas, Roberto
Friedl, Alexander
Homberg, Roland
Pfitzenmaier, Jesco
Naumann, Carsten M.
Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
Hofmann, Torben
Rose, Achim
Weidemann, Christian
Wotzka, Carola
Hübner, Wilhelm
Loertzer, Hagen
Abdunnur, Rudi
Grabbert, Markus
Anding, Ralf
Bauer, Ricarda M.
Haferkamp, Axel
Schrader, Andres J.
author_facet Queissert, Fabian
Huesch, Tanja
Kretschmer, Alexander
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Pottek, Tobias
Olianas, Roberto
Friedl, Alexander
Homberg, Roland
Pfitzenmaier, Jesco
Naumann, Carsten M.
Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
Hofmann, Torben
Rose, Achim
Weidemann, Christian
Wotzka, Carola
Hübner, Wilhelm
Loertzer, Hagen
Abdunnur, Rudi
Grabbert, Markus
Anding, Ralf
Bauer, Ricarda M.
Haferkamp, Axel
Schrader, Andres J.
author_sort Queissert, Fabian
collection PubMed
description Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%; p = 0.08). Revision was required significantly more often for this group (43.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.05) due to urethral erosion in 18 of 25 cases. A stenosis recurred in five cases; desobstruction was performed in two cases, leading to erosion in both. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of revision when recurrent stenosis necessitated at least two prior desobstructions (HR 2.8; p = 0.003). Conclusions: A devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102991542023-06-28 Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet? Queissert, Fabian Huesch, Tanja Kretschmer, Alexander Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Pottek, Tobias Olianas, Roberto Friedl, Alexander Homberg, Roland Pfitzenmaier, Jesco Naumann, Carsten M. Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Hofmann, Torben Rose, Achim Weidemann, Christian Wotzka, Carola Hübner, Wilhelm Loertzer, Hagen Abdunnur, Rudi Grabbert, Markus Anding, Ralf Bauer, Ricarda M. Haferkamp, Axel Schrader, Andres J. J Clin Med Article Background: Circular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%; p = 0.08). Revision was required significantly more often for this group (43.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.05) due to urethral erosion in 18 of 25 cases. A stenosis recurred in five cases; desobstruction was performed in two cases, leading to erosion in both. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of revision when recurrent stenosis necessitated at least two prior desobstructions (HR 2.8; p = 0.003). Conclusions: A devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis. MDPI 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10299154/ /pubmed/37373698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Queissert, Fabian
Huesch, Tanja
Kretschmer, Alexander
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Pottek, Tobias
Olianas, Roberto
Friedl, Alexander
Homberg, Roland
Pfitzenmaier, Jesco
Naumann, Carsten M.
Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
Hofmann, Torben
Rose, Achim
Weidemann, Christian
Wotzka, Carola
Hübner, Wilhelm
Loertzer, Hagen
Abdunnur, Rudi
Grabbert, Markus
Anding, Ralf
Bauer, Ricarda M.
Haferkamp, Axel
Schrader, Andres J.
Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title_full Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title_fullStr Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title_short Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?
title_sort is the standard artificial urinary sphincter ams 800 still a treatment option for the irradiated male patient presenting with a devastated bladder outlet?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124002
work_keys_str_mv AT queissertfabian isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT hueschtanja isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT kretschmeralexander isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT kirschnerhermannsruth isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT pottektobias isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT olianasroberto isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT friedlalexander isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT hombergroland isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT pfitzenmaierjesco isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT naumanncarstenm isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT nyarangidixjoanne isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT hofmanntorben isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT roseachim isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT weidemannchristian isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT wotzkacarola isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT hubnerwilhelm isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT loertzerhagen isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT abdunnurrudi isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT grabbertmarkus isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT andingralf isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT bauerricardam isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT haferkampaxel isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet
AT schraderandresj isthestandardartificialurinarysphincterams800stillatreatmentoptionfortheirradiatedmalepatientpresentingwithadevastatedbladderoutlet