Cargando…

Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures

Introduction: Due to their favourable hemodynamic performance and the ability to enable minimally invasive access procedures, sutureless aortic valve prostheses have found their place in the armamentarium of cardiothoracic surgeons. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubarevich, Alina, Amanov, Lukman, Arjomandi Rad, Arian, Beltsios, Eleftherios T., Szczechowicz, Marcin, Osswald, Anja, Ruhparwar, Arjang, Weymann, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124163
_version_ 1785064335176892416
author Zubarevich, Alina
Amanov, Lukman
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Beltsios, Eleftherios T.
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Osswald, Anja
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
author_facet Zubarevich, Alina
Amanov, Lukman
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Beltsios, Eleftherios T.
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Osswald, Anja
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
author_sort Zubarevich, Alina
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Due to their favourable hemodynamic performance and the ability to enable minimally invasive access procedures, sutureless aortic valve prostheses have found their place in the armamentarium of cardiothoracic surgeons. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR). Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients who underwent an SU-AVR with a Perceval valve between December 2019 and February 2023. Results: The mean age of patients was 69.3 ± 8.1 years, and patients showed a moderate-risk profile with a mean logistic EuroSCORE-II of 5.2 ± 8.1%. An isolated SU-AVR was performed in 85 (42.5%) patients, concomitant CABG was performed in 75 (37.5%) and 40 patients (20%) underwent a multivalve procedure involving SU-AVR. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp (CC) times were 82.1 ± 35.1 and 55.5 ± 27.8 min, respectively. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates were 4.5%, 6.5%, 7.5% and 8.2%, respectively. The postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradient was 6.3 ± 1.6 mmHg and stayed stable over the follow-up time. We reported no cases of paravalvular leakage, and the incidence of stroke was 0.5%. Conclusions: With their favourable hemodynamic performance and shorter CC and CPB times, sutureless aortic valve prostheses facilitate minimally invasive access surgery, being a safe and durable promising approach for the surgical AVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102993202023-06-28 Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures Zubarevich, Alina Amanov, Lukman Arjomandi Rad, Arian Beltsios, Eleftherios T. Szczechowicz, Marcin Osswald, Anja Ruhparwar, Arjang Weymann, Alexander J Clin Med Article Introduction: Due to their favourable hemodynamic performance and the ability to enable minimally invasive access procedures, sutureless aortic valve prostheses have found their place in the armamentarium of cardiothoracic surgeons. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR). Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients who underwent an SU-AVR with a Perceval valve between December 2019 and February 2023. Results: The mean age of patients was 69.3 ± 8.1 years, and patients showed a moderate-risk profile with a mean logistic EuroSCORE-II of 5.2 ± 8.1%. An isolated SU-AVR was performed in 85 (42.5%) patients, concomitant CABG was performed in 75 (37.5%) and 40 patients (20%) underwent a multivalve procedure involving SU-AVR. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp (CC) times were 82.1 ± 35.1 and 55.5 ± 27.8 min, respectively. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates were 4.5%, 6.5%, 7.5% and 8.2%, respectively. The postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradient was 6.3 ± 1.6 mmHg and stayed stable over the follow-up time. We reported no cases of paravalvular leakage, and the incidence of stroke was 0.5%. Conclusions: With their favourable hemodynamic performance and shorter CC and CPB times, sutureless aortic valve prostheses facilitate minimally invasive access surgery, being a safe and durable promising approach for the surgical AVR. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10299320/ /pubmed/37373856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124163 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zubarevich, Alina
Amanov, Lukman
Arjomandi Rad, Arian
Beltsios, Eleftherios T.
Szczechowicz, Marcin
Osswald, Anja
Ruhparwar, Arjang
Weymann, Alexander
Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title_full Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title_fullStr Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title_short Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures
title_sort single-center real-world experience with sutureless aortic valve prosthesis in isolated and combined procedures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124163
work_keys_str_mv AT zubarevichalina singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT amanovlukman singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT arjomandiradarian singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT beltsioseleftheriost singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT szczechowiczmarcin singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT osswaldanja singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT ruhparwararjang singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures
AT weymannalexander singlecenterrealworldexperiencewithsuturelessaorticvalveprosthesisinisolatedandcombinedprocedures