Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Whole-Body Patlak [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Indeterminate Lung Lesions and Lymph Nodes
Background: Static [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT is the imaging method of choice for the evaluation of indeterminate lung lesions and NSCLC staging; however, histological confirmation of PET-positive lesions is needed in most cases due to its limited specificity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123942 |
Sumario: | Background: Static [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT is the imaging method of choice for the evaluation of indeterminate lung lesions and NSCLC staging; however, histological confirmation of PET-positive lesions is needed in most cases due to its limited specificity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of additional dynamic whole-body PET. Methods: A total of 34 consecutive patients with indeterminate pulmonary lesions were enrolled in this prospective trial. All patients underwent static (60 min p.i.) and dynamic (0–60 min p.i.) whole-body [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT (300 MBq) using the multi-bed-multi-timepoint technique (Siemens mCT FlowMotion). Histology and follow-up served as ground truth. Kinetic modeling factors were calculated using a two-compartment linear Patlak model (FDG influx rate constant = Ki, metabolic rate = MR-FDG, distribution volume = DV-FDG) and compared to SUV using ROC analysis. Results: MR-FDG(mean) provided the best discriminatory power between benign and malignant lung lesions with an AUC of 0.887. The AUC of DV-FDG(mean) (0.818) and SUV(mean) (0.827) was non-significantly lower. For LNM, the AUCs for MR-FDG(mean) (0.987) and SUV(mean) (0.993) were comparable. Moreover, the DV-FDG(mean) in liver metastases was three times higher than in bone or lung metastases. Conclusions: Metabolic rate quantification was shown to be a reliable method to detect malignant lung tumors, LNM, and distant metastases at least as accurately as the established SUV or dual-time-point PET scans. |
---|