Cargando…

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices

Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a misoprostol vaginal insert as an induction-of-labor (IOL) agent in women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 2) in achieving vaginal delivery (VD) within 48 h, depending on the gestational week, with partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Socha, Maciej W., Flis, Wojciech, Wartęga, Mateusz, Stankiewicz, Martyna, Kunicka, Aleksandra
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2023
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124106

Ejemplares similares

A Review of the Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applications of Osmotic Dilators for Cervical Ripening in the Induction of Labor and in Gynecology Procedures
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Risk of Cesarean Delivery after Vaginal Inserts with Prostaglandin Analogs and Single-Balloon Catheter Used for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Results of Induction of Labor with Prostaglandins E1 and E2 (The RIPE Study): A Real-World Data Analysis of Obstetrical Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacological Induction of Labor with Vaginal Inserts
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of Oxidative Stress on Molecular Mechanisms of Cervical Ripening in Pregnant Women
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Signaling Pathways Regulating Human Cervical Ripening in Preterm and Term Delivery
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Raspberry Leaves and Extracts-Molecular Mechanism of Action and Its Effectiveness on Human Cervical Ripening and the Induction of Labor
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The 300 versus 300 Study—Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Unexpected Uterine Rupture—A Case Report, Review of the Literature and Clinical Suggestions
por: Flis, Wojciech, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Decrease in Nitric Oxide Production as a Key Mediator in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia and a Potential Therapeutic Target: A Case-Control Study
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of vaginal washing before Misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: A randomized single‐blind clinical trial
por: Kabodmehri, Roya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Labor Induction: A Cost–Consequences Model for 5 European Countries—An Economic Evaluation Supported with Literature Review and Retrospective Data Collection
por: Bierut, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Role of NF-κB in Uterine Spiral Arteries Remodeling, Insight into the Cornerstone of Preeclampsia
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix
por: Kashanian, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Jahromi, Bahia Namavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies
por: Rahimi, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
por: Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_26tkeog1k8pnav9maueevt34da