Cargando…

Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients

Hypertension in Mexico has a prevalence of 32% and is the second most widespread cause of consultation in primary care. Only 40% of patients in treatment have a blood pressure (BP) below 140/90 mmHg. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badillo-Alonso, Humberto, Martínez-Alanis, Marisol, Sánchez-Huesca, Ramiro, Lerma, Abel, Lerma, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060243
_version_ 1785064407050485760
author Badillo-Alonso, Humberto
Martínez-Alanis, Marisol
Sánchez-Huesca, Ramiro
Lerma, Abel
Lerma, Claudia
author_facet Badillo-Alonso, Humberto
Martínez-Alanis, Marisol
Sánchez-Huesca, Ramiro
Lerma, Abel
Lerma, Claudia
author_sort Badillo-Alonso, Humberto
collection PubMed
description Hypertension in Mexico has a prevalence of 32% and is the second most widespread cause of consultation in primary care. Only 40% of patients in treatment have a blood pressure (BP) below 140/90 mmHg. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipine versus the empirical treatment for hypertension in patients with uncontrolled BP in a primary care center in Mexico City. Participants were randomized to treatment with enalapril and nifedipine (combination group) or to continue with the empirical treatment. Outcome variables were BP control, therapeutic adherence, and adverse effects at 6 months of follow-up. At the end of the follow-up period, BP control (64% versus 77%) and therapeutic adherence (53% versus 93%) showed an improvement from the baseline values in the group that received the combination treatment. BP control (51% versus 47%) and therapeutic adherence (64% versus 59%) in the group who received the empirical treatment did not show improvement from the baseline to follow-up. Combined treatment was 31% more efficacious than conventional empirical treatment (odds ratio = 3.9), which yielded an incremental clinical utility of 18% with high tolerability extent among patients in primary care in Mexico City. These results contribute to the control of arterial hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102996102023-06-28 Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients Badillo-Alonso, Humberto Martínez-Alanis, Marisol Sánchez-Huesca, Ramiro Lerma, Abel Lerma, Claudia J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article Hypertension in Mexico has a prevalence of 32% and is the second most widespread cause of consultation in primary care. Only 40% of patients in treatment have a blood pressure (BP) below 140/90 mmHg. This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipine versus the empirical treatment for hypertension in patients with uncontrolled BP in a primary care center in Mexico City. Participants were randomized to treatment with enalapril and nifedipine (combination group) or to continue with the empirical treatment. Outcome variables were BP control, therapeutic adherence, and adverse effects at 6 months of follow-up. At the end of the follow-up period, BP control (64% versus 77%) and therapeutic adherence (53% versus 93%) showed an improvement from the baseline values in the group that received the combination treatment. BP control (51% versus 47%) and therapeutic adherence (64% versus 59%) in the group who received the empirical treatment did not show improvement from the baseline to follow-up. Combined treatment was 31% more efficacious than conventional empirical treatment (odds ratio = 3.9), which yielded an incremental clinical utility of 18% with high tolerability extent among patients in primary care in Mexico City. These results contribute to the control of arterial hypertension. MDPI 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10299610/ /pubmed/37367408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060243 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Badillo-Alonso, Humberto
Martínez-Alanis, Marisol
Sánchez-Huesca, Ramiro
Lerma, Abel
Lerma, Claudia
Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title_full Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title_short Effectiveness of the Combination of Enalapril and Nifedipine for the Treatment of Hypertension versus Empirical Treatment in Primary Care Patients
title_sort effectiveness of the combination of enalapril and nifedipine for the treatment of hypertension versus empirical treatment in primary care patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060243
work_keys_str_mv AT badilloalonsohumberto effectivenessofthecombinationofenalaprilandnifedipineforthetreatmentofhypertensionversusempiricaltreatmentinprimarycarepatients
AT martinezalanismarisol effectivenessofthecombinationofenalaprilandnifedipineforthetreatmentofhypertensionversusempiricaltreatmentinprimarycarepatients
AT sanchezhuescaramiro effectivenessofthecombinationofenalaprilandnifedipineforthetreatmentofhypertensionversusempiricaltreatmentinprimarycarepatients
AT lermaabel effectivenessofthecombinationofenalaprilandnifedipineforthetreatmentofhypertensionversusempiricaltreatmentinprimarycarepatients
AT lermaclaudia effectivenessofthecombinationofenalaprilandnifedipineforthetreatmentofhypertensionversusempiricaltreatmentinprimarycarepatients