Cargando…
Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Em...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030 |
_version_ | 1785064420487987200 |
---|---|
author | Marcos-Alonso, Susana Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole Monopoli-Roca, Chiara Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib Pacheco-López, Sofía Peña-Navarro, Paula Serradilla-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel |
author_facet | Marcos-Alonso, Susana Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole Monopoli-Roca, Chiara Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib Pacheco-López, Sofía Peña-Navarro, Paula Serradilla-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel |
author_sort | Marcos-Alonso, Susana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102996662023-06-28 Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Marcos-Alonso, Susana Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole Monopoli-Roca, Chiara Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib Pacheco-López, Sofía Peña-Navarro, Paula Serradilla-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel J Clin Med Review Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids. MDPI 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10299666/ /pubmed/37373724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Marcos-Alonso, Susana Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole Monopoli-Roca, Chiara Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib Pacheco-López, Sofía Peña-Navarro, Paula Serradilla-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | factors impacting the use or rejection of hearing aids—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcosalonsosusana factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT almeidaayervecristinanicole factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT monopolirocachiara factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT coroneltoumaguillermosalib factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pachecolopezsofia factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT penanavarropaula factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT serradillalopezjosemanuel factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sanchezgomezhortensia factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pardalrefoyojoseluis factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT batuecascaletrioangel factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |