Cargando…

Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcos-Alonso, Susana, Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole, Monopoli-Roca, Chiara, Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib, Pacheco-López, Sofía, Peña-Navarro, Paula, Serradilla-López, José Manuel, Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia, Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis, Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030
_version_ 1785064420487987200
author Marcos-Alonso, Susana
Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole
Monopoli-Roca, Chiara
Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib
Pacheco-López, Sofía
Peña-Navarro, Paula
Serradilla-López, José Manuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia
Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis
Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel
author_facet Marcos-Alonso, Susana
Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole
Monopoli-Roca, Chiara
Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib
Pacheco-López, Sofía
Peña-Navarro, Paula
Serradilla-López, José Manuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia
Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis
Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel
author_sort Marcos-Alonso, Susana
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102996662023-06-28 Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Marcos-Alonso, Susana Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole Monopoli-Roca, Chiara Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib Pacheco-López, Sofía Peña-Navarro, Paula Serradilla-López, José Manuel Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel J Clin Med Review Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids. MDPI 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10299666/ /pubmed/37373724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Marcos-Alonso, Susana
Almeida-Ayerve, Cristina Nicole
Monopoli-Roca, Chiara
Coronel-Touma, Guillermo Salib
Pacheco-López, Sofía
Peña-Navarro, Paula
Serradilla-López, José Manuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Hortensia
Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis
Batuecas-Caletrío, Ángel
Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort factors impacting the use or rejection of hearing aids—a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124030
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosalonsosusana factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT almeidaayervecristinanicole factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT monopolirocachiara factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coroneltoumaguillermosalib factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pachecolopezsofia factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT penanavarropaula factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT serradillalopezjosemanuel factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sanchezgomezhortensia factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pardalrefoyojoseluis factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT batuecascaletrioangel factorsimpactingtheuseorrejectionofhearingaidsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis