Cargando…
Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO
Background: For moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung-protective ventilation combined with prolonged and repeated prone position (PP) is recommended. For the most severe patients for whom this strategy failed, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) all...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123918 |
_version_ | 1785064423960870912 |
---|---|
author | Textoris, Laura Gragueb-Chatti, Ines Daviet, Florence Valera, Sabine Sanz, Céline Papazian, Laurent Forel, Jean-Marie Hraiech, Sami Roch, Antoine Guervilly, Christophe |
author_facet | Textoris, Laura Gragueb-Chatti, Ines Daviet, Florence Valera, Sabine Sanz, Céline Papazian, Laurent Forel, Jean-Marie Hraiech, Sami Roch, Antoine Guervilly, Christophe |
author_sort | Textoris, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: For moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung-protective ventilation combined with prolonged and repeated prone position (PP) is recommended. For the most severe patients for whom this strategy failed, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) allows a reduction in ventilation-induced lung injury and improves survival. Some aggregated data have suggested a benefit regarding survival in pursuing PP during vv-ECMO. The combination of PP and vv-ECMO has been also documented in COVID-19 studies, although there is scarce evidence concerning respiratory mechanics and gas exchange response. The main objective was to compare the physiological response of the first PP during vv-ECMO in two cohorts of patients (COVID-19-related ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS) regarding respiratory system compliance (C(RS)) and oxygenation changes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and ambispective cohort study in the ECMO center of Marseille, France. ECMO was indicated according to the EOLIA trial criteria. Results: A total of 85 patients were included, 60 in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 25 in the COVID-19-related ARDS group. Lung injuries of the COVID-19 cohort exhibited significantly higher severity with a lower C(RS) at baseline. Concerning the main objective, the first PP during vv-ECMO was not associated with a change in C(RS) or other variation in respiratory mechanic variables in both cohorts. By contrast, oxygenation was improved only in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group after a return to the supine position. Mean arterial pressure was higher during PP as compared with a return to the supine position in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: We found distinct physiological responses to the first PP in vv-ECMO-supported ARDS patients according to the COVID-19 etiology. This could be due to higher severity at baseline or specificity of the disease. Further investigations are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102996802023-06-28 Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO Textoris, Laura Gragueb-Chatti, Ines Daviet, Florence Valera, Sabine Sanz, Céline Papazian, Laurent Forel, Jean-Marie Hraiech, Sami Roch, Antoine Guervilly, Christophe J Clin Med Article Background: For moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung-protective ventilation combined with prolonged and repeated prone position (PP) is recommended. For the most severe patients for whom this strategy failed, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) allows a reduction in ventilation-induced lung injury and improves survival. Some aggregated data have suggested a benefit regarding survival in pursuing PP during vv-ECMO. The combination of PP and vv-ECMO has been also documented in COVID-19 studies, although there is scarce evidence concerning respiratory mechanics and gas exchange response. The main objective was to compare the physiological response of the first PP during vv-ECMO in two cohorts of patients (COVID-19-related ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS) regarding respiratory system compliance (C(RS)) and oxygenation changes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and ambispective cohort study in the ECMO center of Marseille, France. ECMO was indicated according to the EOLIA trial criteria. Results: A total of 85 patients were included, 60 in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 25 in the COVID-19-related ARDS group. Lung injuries of the COVID-19 cohort exhibited significantly higher severity with a lower C(RS) at baseline. Concerning the main objective, the first PP during vv-ECMO was not associated with a change in C(RS) or other variation in respiratory mechanic variables in both cohorts. By contrast, oxygenation was improved only in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group after a return to the supine position. Mean arterial pressure was higher during PP as compared with a return to the supine position in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: We found distinct physiological responses to the first PP in vv-ECMO-supported ARDS patients according to the COVID-19 etiology. This could be due to higher severity at baseline or specificity of the disease. Further investigations are warranted. MDPI 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10299680/ /pubmed/37373612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123918 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Textoris, Laura Gragueb-Chatti, Ines Daviet, Florence Valera, Sabine Sanz, Céline Papazian, Laurent Forel, Jean-Marie Hraiech, Sami Roch, Antoine Guervilly, Christophe Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title | Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title_full | Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title_fullStr | Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title_short | Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO |
title_sort | response to prone position in covid-19 and non-covid-19 patients with severe ards supported by vvecmo |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT textorislaura responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT graguebchattiines responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT davietflorence responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT valerasabine responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT sanzceline responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT papazianlaurent responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT foreljeanmarie responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT hraiechsami responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT rochantoine responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo AT guervillychristophe responsetopronepositionincovid19andnoncovid19patientswithsevereardssupportedbyvvecmo |