Cargando…

The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Body mass index (BMI) has commonly been used to evaluate the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but BMI does not always represent body fat mass distribution. Body fat index (BFI), which includes the measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (V...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benchahong, Sawanya, Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert, Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388597
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39615
_version_ 1785064468266352640
author Benchahong, Sawanya
Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert
Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
author_facet Benchahong, Sawanya
Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert
Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
author_sort Benchahong, Sawanya
collection PubMed
description Background: Body mass index (BMI) has commonly been used to evaluate the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but BMI does not always represent body fat mass distribution. Body fat index (BFI), which includes the measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), has been suggested to be a better predictor for GDM than BMI. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the risk of GDM among pregnant females with BFI of >0.5 and ≤0.5. Methods: Maternal abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) thickness were measured by ultrasonography before 14 weeks of gestation, and BFI was calculated (VAT×SAT/height). The study group was 160 females with BFI of >0.5, and the comparison group was 80 females with BFI of ≤0.5. All females received GDM screening during the first antenatal visit and at 24-28 weeks of gestation. The rate of GDM was compared between the two groups. The correlation between BFI and BMI and their diagnostic ability for GDM were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent associated factors for GDM. Results: Females with BFI of >0.5 were significantly older (p=0.033) and had higher body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001) and were more likely to be overweight or obese (p<0.001). BFI correlated well with BMI (correlation coefficient of 0.736, p<0.001). GDM was significantly more common in females with BFI of >0.5 (24.4% versus 11.3%, p=0.017). The diagnostic ability for GDM between BFI and BMI was similar (areas under receiver operating characteristic {ROC} curves of 0.641 and 0.646, respectively). Significant independent risk factors for GDM were a BFI of >0.5 and a BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) (adjusted odds ratio {OR}, 3.8; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.5-9.2), age of ≥30 years (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.4), and family history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (adjusted OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9-8.3). Conclusion: Females with BFI of >0.5 were significantly more likely to have GDM. The diagnostic ability of BFI and BMI for GDM was comparable. Females with BFI of >0.5 and BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) have an increased risk for GDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10299897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102998972023-06-29 The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study Benchahong, Sawanya Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Background: Body mass index (BMI) has commonly been used to evaluate the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but BMI does not always represent body fat mass distribution. Body fat index (BFI), which includes the measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), has been suggested to be a better predictor for GDM than BMI. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the risk of GDM among pregnant females with BFI of >0.5 and ≤0.5. Methods: Maternal abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) thickness were measured by ultrasonography before 14 weeks of gestation, and BFI was calculated (VAT×SAT/height). The study group was 160 females with BFI of >0.5, and the comparison group was 80 females with BFI of ≤0.5. All females received GDM screening during the first antenatal visit and at 24-28 weeks of gestation. The rate of GDM was compared between the two groups. The correlation between BFI and BMI and their diagnostic ability for GDM were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent associated factors for GDM. Results: Females with BFI of >0.5 were significantly older (p=0.033) and had higher body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001) and were more likely to be overweight or obese (p<0.001). BFI correlated well with BMI (correlation coefficient of 0.736, p<0.001). GDM was significantly more common in females with BFI of >0.5 (24.4% versus 11.3%, p=0.017). The diagnostic ability for GDM between BFI and BMI was similar (areas under receiver operating characteristic {ROC} curves of 0.641 and 0.646, respectively). Significant independent risk factors for GDM were a BFI of >0.5 and a BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) (adjusted odds ratio {OR}, 3.8; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.5-9.2), age of ≥30 years (adjusted OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.4), and family history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (adjusted OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9-8.3). Conclusion: Females with BFI of >0.5 were significantly more likely to have GDM. The diagnostic ability of BFI and BMI for GDM was comparable. Females with BFI of >0.5 and BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) have an increased risk for GDM. Cureus 2023-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10299897/ /pubmed/37388597 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39615 Text en Copyright © 2023, Benchahong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Benchahong, Sawanya
Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert
Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short The Association Between Body Fat Index and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort association between body fat index and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388597
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39615
work_keys_str_mv AT benchahongsawanya theassociationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sunsaneevithayakulprasert theassociationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT boriboonhirunsarndittakarn theassociationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT benchahongsawanya associationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sunsaneevithayakulprasert associationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT boriboonhirunsarndittakarn associationbetweenbodyfatindexandgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy