Cargando…

Impact of a Comprehensive Intervention Bundle Including the Drug Burden Index on Deprescribing Anticholinergic and Sedative Drugs in Older Acute Inpatients: A Non-randomised Controlled Before-and-After Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of the Drug Burden Index (DBI) as a risk assessment tool in clinical practice may facilitate deprescribing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a comprehensive intervention bundle using the DBI impacts (i) the proportion of older inpatients with at le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Kenji, Hooper, Patrick, Masnoon, Nashwa, Lo, Sarita, Gnjidic, Danijela, Etherton-Beer, Christopher, Reeve, Emily, Magin, Parker, Bell, J. Simon, Rockwood, Kenneth, O’Donnell, Lisa Kouladjian, Sawan, Mouna, Baysari, Melissa, Hilmer, Sarah N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01032-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Implementation of the Drug Burden Index (DBI) as a risk assessment tool in clinical practice may facilitate deprescribing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a comprehensive intervention bundle using the DBI impacts (i) the proportion of older inpatients with at least one DBI-contributing medication stopped or dose reduced on discharge, compared with admission; and (ii) the changes in deprescribing of different DBI-contributing medication classes during hospitalisation. METHODS: This before-and-after study was conducted in an Australian metropolitan tertiary referral hospital. Patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the acute aged care service for ≥ 48 h from December 2020 to October 2021 and prescribed DBI-contributing medication were included. During the control period, usual care was provided. During the intervention, access to the intervention bundle was added, including a clinician interface displaying DBI score in the electronic medical record. In a subsequent ‘stewardship’ period, a stewardship pharmacist used the bundle to provide clinicians with patient-specific recommendations on deprescribing of DBI-contributing medications. RESULTS: Overall, 457 hospitalisations were included. The proportion of patients with at least one DBI-contributing medication stopped/reduced on discharge increased from 29.9% (control period) to 37.5% [intervention; adjusted risk difference (aRD) 6.5%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) −3.2 to 17.5%] and 43.1% (stewardship; aRD 12.1%, 95% CI 1.0–24.0%). The proportion of opioid prescriptions stopped/reduced rose from 17.9% during control to 45.7% during stewardship (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Integrating a comprehensive intervention bundle and accompanying stewardship program is a promising strategy to facilitate deprescribing of sedative and anticholinergic medications in older inpatients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40266-023-01032-6.