Cargando…
Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022
BACKGROUND: Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2 |
_version_ | 1785064486527303680 |
---|---|
author | Chander, Subhash Luhana, Sindhu Sadarat, Fnu Leys, Lorenzo Parkash, Om Kumari, Roopa |
author_facet | Chander, Subhash Luhana, Sindhu Sadarat, Fnu Leys, Lorenzo Parkash, Om Kumari, Roopa |
author_sort | Chander, Subhash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organizational cultures. METHODS: A retrospective bibliometric study design was used to investigate the representation of gender and racial/ethnic groups in the authorship of critical care randomized controlled trials in 12 high-impact journals from 2000 to 2022. RESULTS: In the 1398 randomized controlled trials included in this study, only 24.61% of the first authors and 16.6% of the senior authors were female. Although female authorship increased during the study period, authorship was significantly higher for males throughout (Chi-square for trend, p < 0.0001). The educational attainment [χ(2)(4) = 99.2, p < 0.0001] and the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ(2)(42) = 70.3, p = 0.0029] were significantly associated with gender. Male authorship was significantly more prevalent in 10 out of 12 journals analyzed in this study [χ(2)(11) = 110.1, p < 0.0001]. The most common race/ethnic group in our study population was White (85.1% women, 85.4% males), followed by Asians (14.3% females, 14.3% males). Although there was a significant increase in the number of non-White authors between 2000 and 2022 [χ(2)(22) = 77.3, p < 0.0001], the trend was driven by an increase in non-White male and not non-White female authors. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with the country of the author’s affiliated institution [χ(2)(41) = 1107, p < 0.0001] but not with gender or educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent gender and racial disparities in high-impact medical and critical care journals underscore the need to revise policies and strategies to encourage greater diversity in critical care research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10299980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102999802023-06-29 Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 Chander, Subhash Luhana, Sindhu Sadarat, Fnu Leys, Lorenzo Parkash, Om Kumari, Roopa Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organizational cultures. METHODS: A retrospective bibliometric study design was used to investigate the representation of gender and racial/ethnic groups in the authorship of critical care randomized controlled trials in 12 high-impact journals from 2000 to 2022. RESULTS: In the 1398 randomized controlled trials included in this study, only 24.61% of the first authors and 16.6% of the senior authors were female. Although female authorship increased during the study period, authorship was significantly higher for males throughout (Chi-square for trend, p < 0.0001). The educational attainment [χ(2)(4) = 99.2, p < 0.0001] and the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ(2)(42) = 70.3, p = 0.0029] were significantly associated with gender. Male authorship was significantly more prevalent in 10 out of 12 journals analyzed in this study [χ(2)(11) = 110.1, p < 0.0001]. The most common race/ethnic group in our study population was White (85.1% women, 85.4% males), followed by Asians (14.3% females, 14.3% males). Although there was a significant increase in the number of non-White authors between 2000 and 2022 [χ(2)(22) = 77.3, p < 0.0001], the trend was driven by an increase in non-White male and not non-White female authors. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with the country of the author’s affiliated institution [χ(2)(41) = 1107, p < 0.0001] but not with gender or educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent gender and racial disparities in high-impact medical and critical care journals underscore the need to revise policies and strategies to encourage greater diversity in critical care research. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10299980/ /pubmed/37368060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Chander, Subhash Luhana, Sindhu Sadarat, Fnu Leys, Lorenzo Parkash, Om Kumari, Roopa Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title | Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title_full | Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title_fullStr | Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title_short | Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
title_sort | gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandersubhash genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 AT luhanasindhu genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 AT sadaratfnu genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 AT leyslorenzo genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 AT parkashom genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 AT kumariroopa genderandracialdifferencesinfirstandseniorauthorshipofhighimpactcriticalcarerandomizedcontrolledtrialstudiesfrom2000to2022 |